Literature DB >> 19180216

The relationships among sagittal-plane lower extremity moments: implications for landing strategy in anterior cruciate ligament injury prevention.

Yohei Shimokochi1, Sae Yong Lee, Sandra J Shultz, Randy J Schmitz.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Excessive quadriceps contraction with insufficient hamstrings muscle cocontraction has been shown to be a possible contributing factor for noncontact anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries. Assessing the relationships among lower extremity internal moments may provide some insight into avoiding muscle contraction patterns that increase ACL injury risk.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationships of knee-extensor moment with ankle plantar-flexor and hip-extensor moments and to examine the relationship between knee moment and center of pressure as a measure of neuromuscular response to center-of-mass position.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional study.
SETTING: Applied Neuromechanics Research Laboratory. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: Eighteen healthy, recreationally active women (age = 22.3 +/- 2.8 years, height = 162.5 +/- 8.1 cm, mass = 57.8 +/- 9.3 kg). INTERVENTION(S): Participants performed a single-leg landing from a 45-cm box onto a force plate. Kinetic and kinematic data were collected. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Pearson product moment correlation coefficients were calculated among the net peak knee-extensor moment (KEMpk), sagittal-plane ankle (AM) and hip (HM) net internal moments, and anterior-posterior center of pressure relative to foot center of mass at KEMpk (COP).
RESULTS: Lower KEMpk related to both greater AM (r = -0.942, P < .001) and HM (r = -0.657, P = .003). We also found that more anterior displacement of COP was related to greater AM (r = -0.750, P < .001) and lower KEMpk (r = 0.618, P = .006).
CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that participants who lean the whole body forward during landing may produce more plantar-flexor moment and less knee-extensor moment, possibly increasing hip-extensor moment and decreasing knee-extensor moment production. These results suggest that leaning forward may be a technique to decrease quadriceps contraction demand while increasing hamstrings cocontraction demand during a single-leg landing.

Entities:  

Keywords:  hamstrings muscle contraction; quadriceps muscle contraction

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19180216      PMCID: PMC2629037          DOI: 10.4085/1062-6050-44.1.33

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Athl Train        ISSN: 1062-6050            Impact factor:   2.860


  24 in total

1.  The effect of neuromuscular training on the incidence of knee injury in female athletes. A prospective study.

Authors:  T E Hewett; T N Lindenfeld; J V Riccobene; F R Noyes
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1999 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.202

2.  Hamstrings cocontraction reduces internal rotation, anterior translation, and anterior cruciate ligament load in weight-bearing flexion.

Authors:  B A MacWilliams; D R Wilson; J D DesJardins; J Romero; E Y Chao
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.494

3.  Determinants of cruciate-ligament loading during rehabilitation exercise.

Authors:  K.B. Shelburne; M.G. Pandy
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 2.063

4.  Effects of applied quadriceps and hamstrings muscle loads on forces in the anterior and posterior cruciate ligaments.

Authors:  Keith L Markolf; Geoffery O'Neill; Steven R Jackson; David R McAllister
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2004-05-18       Impact factor: 6.202

5.  In-vivo sagittal plane knee kinematics: ACL intact, deficient and reconstructed knees.

Authors:  D L Isaac; D J Beard; A J Price; J Rees; D W Murray; C A F Dodd
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Direct in vitro measurement of forces in the cruciate ligaments. Part I: The effect of multiplane loading in the intact knee.

Authors:  D C Wascher; K L Markolf; M S Shapiro; G A Finerman
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  The biomechanics of anterior cruciate ligament rehabilitation and reconstruction.

Authors:  S W Arms; M H Pope; R J Johnson; R A Fischer; I Arvidsson; E Eriksson
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1984 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.202

8.  Muscular coactivation. The role of the antagonist musculature in maintaining knee stability.

Authors:  R Baratta; M Solomonow; B H Zhou; D Letson; R Chuinard; R D'Ambrosia
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1988 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  Changes in landing biomechanics during a fatiguing landing activity.

Authors:  Michael L Madigan; Peter E Pidcoe
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.368

10.  Aggressive quadriceps loading can induce noncontact anterior cruciate ligament injury.

Authors:  Gene DeMorat; Paul Weinhold; Troy Blackburn; Steven Chudik; William Garrett
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 6.202

View more
  18 in total

1.  ACL Research Retreat VII: An Update on Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury Risk Factor Identification, Screening, and Prevention.

Authors:  Sandra J Shultz; Randy J Schmitz; Anne Benjaminse; Malcolm Collins; Kevin Ford; Anthony S Kulas
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  The effect of landing surface on the plantar kinetics of chinese paratroopers using half-squat landing.

Authors:  Yi Li; Ji Wu; Chao Zheng; Rong Rong Huang; Yuhong Na; Fan Yang; Zengshun Wang; Di Wu
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2013-09-01       Impact factor: 2.988

3.  Changes of gait parameters and lower limb dynamics in recreational runners with achilles tendinopathy.

Authors:  SungJoong Kim; JaeHo Yu
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 2.988

4.  Dynamic sagittal plane trunk control during anterior cruciate ligament injury.

Authors:  Frances T Sheehan; William H Sipprell; Barry P Boden
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 5.  Lower Limb Biomechanics During Single-Leg Landings Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Peta T Johnston; Jodie A McClelland; Kate E Webster
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 11.136

6.  Concurrent musculoskeletal dynamics and finite element analysis predicts altered gait patterns to reduce foot tissue loading.

Authors:  Jason P Halloran; Marko Ackermann; Ahmet Erdemir; Antonie J van den Bogert
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-06-22       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Changing sagittal plane body position during single-leg landings influences the risk of non-contact anterior cruciate ligament injury.

Authors:  Yohei Shimokochi; Jatin P Ambegaonkar; Eric G Meyer; Sae Yong Lee; Sandra J Shultz
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-04-28       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Landing biomechanics in participants with different static lower extremity alignment profiles.

Authors:  Anh-Dung Nguyen; Sandra J Shultz; Randy J Schmitz
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 2.860

9.  Thigh strength and activation as predictors of knee biomechanics during a drop jump task.

Authors:  Sandra J Shultz; Anh-Dung Nguyen; Michael D Leonard; Randy J Schmitz
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 5.411

10.  Is the Landing Error Scoring System Reliable and Valid? A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Ivana Hanzlíková; Kim Hébert-Losier
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 3.843

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.