BACKGROUND: Torsional joint stiffness is thought to play a role in the observed sex bias in noncontact anterior cruciate ligament injury rates. HYPOTHESIS: Women will exhibit lower torsional stiffness values of the knee in response to varus/valgus and internal/external rotations than will men. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Knee kinematics of 20 university students (10 men, 27.3 +/- 3.4 years, 177.3 +/- 6.8 cm, 81.1 +/- 7.0 kg; 10 women, 22.9 +/- 1.5 years, 169.0 +/- 7.1 cm, 66.1 +/- 11.4 kg) were measured while 0 to 10 N . m of varus and valgus torques were applied with the subject nonweightbearing and while 0 to 5 N . m of internal and external torques were applied with the subject nonweightbearing and weightbearing with the use of a custom joint testing device. Joint stiffness values were calculated at 1-N . m increments. RESULTS: When low magnitudes of torque were applied to the knee, women had significantly lower stiffness values than did men. With the exception of applied external torque with the joint weightbearing and varus torque with the joint nonweightbearing, women demonstrated an increase in joint stiffness as the magnitude of torque increased from lower to higher magnitudes. In contrast, for the men, joint stiffness values remained unchanged as the magnitude of applied torque increased. CONCLUSION: Women exhibited lower knee stiffness in response to low magnitudes of applied torque compared to men and demonstrated an increase of joint stiffness as the magnitude of applied torque increased. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The decreased stiffness behavior of the knee in response to low torques that was observed for women may have a role in detrimentally affecting knee biomechanics and resulting neuromuscular function, particularly when an individual transitions from nonweightbearing to weightbearing.
BACKGROUND: Torsional joint stiffness is thought to play a role in the observed sex bias in noncontact anterior cruciate ligament injury rates. HYPOTHESIS: Women will exhibit lower torsional stiffness values of the knee in response to varus/valgus and internal/external rotations than will men. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Knee kinematics of 20 university students (10 men, 27.3 +/- 3.4 years, 177.3 +/- 6.8 cm, 81.1 +/- 7.0 kg; 10 women, 22.9 +/- 1.5 years, 169.0 +/- 7.1 cm, 66.1 +/- 11.4 kg) were measured while 0 to 10 N . m of varus and valgus torques were applied with the subject nonweightbearing and while 0 to 5 N . m of internal and external torques were applied with the subject nonweightbearing and weightbearing with the use of a custom joint testing device. Joint stiffness values were calculated at 1-N . m increments. RESULTS: When low magnitudes of torque were applied to the knee, women had significantly lower stiffness values than did men. With the exception of applied external torque with the joint weightbearing and varus torque with the joint nonweightbearing, women demonstrated an increase in joint stiffness as the magnitude of torque increased from lower to higher magnitudes. In contrast, for the men, joint stiffness values remained unchanged as the magnitude of applied torque increased. CONCLUSION:Women exhibited lower knee stiffness in response to low magnitudes of applied torque compared to men and demonstrated an increase of joint stiffness as the magnitude of applied torque increased. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The decreased stiffness behavior of the knee in response to low torques that was observed for women may have a role in detrimentally affecting knee biomechanics and resulting neuromuscular function, particularly when an individual transitions from nonweightbearing to weightbearing.
Authors: Christopher R Carcia; Sandra J Shultz; Kevin P Granata; Bruce M Gansneder; David H Perrin Journal: Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 2.063
Authors: Sandra J Shultz; Yohei Shimokochi; Anh-Dung Nguyen; Randy J Schmitz; Bruce D Beynnon; David H Perrin Journal: J Orthop Res Date: 2007-08 Impact factor: 3.494
Authors: Sandra J. Shultz; David H. Perrin; Milton J. Adams; Brent L. Arnold; Bruce M. Gansneder; Kevin P. Granata Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2001-03 Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Sandra J Shultz; Randy J Schmitz; Anh-Dung Nguyen; Ajit M Chaudhari; Darin A Padua; Scott G McLean; Susan M Sigward Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2010 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Gregory D Myer; Kevin R Ford; Stephanie L Di Stasi; Kim D Barber Foss; Lyle J Micheli; Timothy E Hewett Journal: Br J Sports Med Date: 2014-03-31 Impact factor: 13.800