Literature DB >> 22381916

Patients' willingness to use a pharmacist-provided medication management service: the influence of outcome expectancies and communication efficacy.

Stephen R Carter1, Rebekah Moles, Lesley White, Timothy F Chen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous research has demonstrated that some patients who are at risk of experiencing medication-related problems express a lack of willingness to use pharmacist-provided medication management services. Little is known about the factors that influence willingness to use these services among patients who have not yet experienced the service.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to test a model of willingness to use the Australian Home Medicines Review (HMR) service. Specifically, this study aimed to determine the influence of positive and negative outcome expectancies and communication efficacy over willingness among patients who were eligible to receive the service but have not yet experienced it.
METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted with patients who were recruited by 264 community pharmacists throughout Australia. Patients were included in the study if they had not yet experienced HMR but were taking more than 5 medicines daily or more than 12 doses daily. Measurement scales were developed using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Structural equation modeling was used to test the model.
RESULTS: Questionnaires received from 286 patients (15.6%) were analyzed. Multi-item measurement scales were observed to have acceptable construct reliabilities (range, 0.69-0.94). Importantly, respondents held overall neutral expectations about the personal benefits of HMR (positive outcome expectancies) but high communication efficacy. Structural equation modeling revealed that positive outcome expectancies (β=0.56, P<.001) and communication efficacy (β=0.25, P<.05) influenced willingness to use, whereas negative outcome expectancies had no significant effect.
CONCLUSIONS: The extent to which patients believe that HMR would provide them with increased medicines knowledge, improve their medicines management capability, and reduce their medicine concerns had a significant influence over willingness to use the service. Because these expectancies are relatively low, there appears to be significant scope for increasing patient demand for these services. Patient-directed material about medication management services should highlight the provision of medication information.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22381916     DOI: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2012.01.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Res Social Adm Pharm        ISSN: 1551-7411


  10 in total

1.  Attitudes of pharmacists to provision of Home Medicines Review for Indigenous Australians.

Authors:  Lindy Swain; Claire Griffits; Lisa Pont; Lesley Barclay
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2014-10-17

2.  General practitioners' perceptions on home medicines reviews: a qualitative analysis.

Authors:  Amrith Kaur Dhillon; Hendrika Laetitia Hattingh; Andrew Stafford; Kreshnik Hoti
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2015-02-07       Impact factor: 2.497

3.  Medicine-related services in community pharmacy: public preferences for pharmacy attributes and promotional methods and comparison with pharmacists' perceptions.

Authors:  Shivaun M Gammie; Ruth M Rodgers; Ruey Leng Loo; Sarah A Corlett; Janet Krska
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2016-11-07       Impact factor: 2.711

4.  Influence of Risk of Drug⁻Drug Interactions and Time Availability on Patient Trust, Satisfaction, and Cooperation with Clinical Pharmacists.

Authors:  Ying-Chyi Chou; Van Thac Dang; Hsin-Yi Yen; Kuan-Ming Lai
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-05-05       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Simplifying Medication Regimens for People Receiving Community-Based Home Care Services: Outcomes of a Non-Randomized Pilot and Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Janet K Sluggett; Choon Ean Ooi; Stephanie Gibson; Manya T Angley; Megan Corlis; Michelle E Hogan; Tessa Caporale; Georgina A Hughes; Jan Van Emden; J Simon Bell
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2020-06-02       Impact factor: 4.458

6.  What do users care about? Research on user behavior of mobile interactive video advertising.

Authors:  Chao Gu; Shuyuan Lin; Jie Sun; Chun Yang; Jiangjie Chen; Qianling Jiang; Wei Miao; Wei Wei
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2022-10-04

7.  The willingness of informal caregivers to assist their care-recipient to use Home Medicines Review.

Authors:  Stephen R Carter; Rebekah Moles; Lesley White; Timothy F Chen
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 3.377

8.  Patient and public perspectives of community pharmacies in the United Kingdom: A systematic review.

Authors:  Ali M K Hindi; Ellen I Schafheutle; Sally Jacobs
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 3.318

Review 9.  A realist synthesis of pharmacist-conducted medication reviews in primary care after leaving hospital: what works for whom and why?

Authors:  Karen Luetsch; Debra Rowett; Michael J Twigg
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 7.035

10.  Comparison of pharmacist and public views and experiences of community pharmacy medicines-related services in England.

Authors:  Ruth M Rodgers; Shivaun M Gammie; Ruey Leng Loo; Sarah A Corlett; Janet Krska
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 2.711

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.