A range of varying chromophore nitroxide free radicals and their nonradical methoxyamine analogues were synthesized and their linear photophysical properties examined. The presence of the proximate free radical masks the chromophore's usual fluorescence emission, and these species are described as profluorescent. Two nitroxides incorporating anthracene and fluorescein chromophores (compounds 7 and 19, respectively) exhibited two-photon absorption (2PA) cross sections of approximately 400 G.M. when excited at wavelengths greater than 800 nm. Both of these profluorescent nitroxides demonstrated low cytotoxicity toward Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells. Imaging colocalization experiments with the commercially available CellROX Deep Red oxidative stress monitor demonstrated good cellular uptake of the nitroxide probes. Sensitivity of the nitroxide probes to H(2)O(2)-induced damage was also demonstrated by both one- and two-photon fluorescence microscopy. These profluorescent nitroxide probes are potentially powerful tools for imaging oxidative stress in biological systems, and they essentially "light up" in the presence of certain species generated from oxidative stress. The high ratio of the fluorescence quantum yield between the profluorescent nitroxide species and their nonradical adducts provides the sensitivity required for measuring a range of cellular redox environments. Furthermore, their reasonable 2PA cross sections provide for the option of using two-photon fluorescence microscopy, which circumvents commonly encountered disadvantages associated with one-photon imaging such as photobleaching and poor tissue penetration.
A range of varying chromophore nitroxidefree radicals and their nonradical methoxyamine analogues were synthesized and their linear photophysical properties examined. The presence of the proximate free radical masks the chromophore's usual fluorescence emission, and these species are described as profluorescent. Two nitroxides incorporating anthracene and fluorescein chromophores (compounds 7 and 19, respectively) exhibited two-photon absorption (2PA) cross sections of approximately 400 G.M. when excited at wavelengths greater than 800 nm. Both of these profluorescent nitroxides demonstrated low cytotoxicity toward Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells. Imaging colocalization experiments with the commercially available CellROX Deep Red oxidative stress monitor demonstrated good cellular uptake of the nitroxide probes. Sensitivity of the nitroxide probes to H(2)O(2)-induced damage was also demonstrated by both one- and two-photon fluorescence microscopy. These profluorescent nitroxide probes are potentially powerful tools for imaging oxidative stress in biological systems, and they essentially "light up" in the presence of certain species generated from oxidative stress. The high ratio of the fluorescence quantum yield between the profluorescent nitroxide species and their nonradical adducts provides the sensitivity required for measuring a range of cellular redox environments. Furthermore, their reasonable 2PA cross sections provide for the option of using two-photon fluorescence microscopy, which circumvents commonly encountered disadvantages associated with one-photon imaging such as photobleaching and poor tissue penetration.
Since the 1960s, the chemistry of nitroxides
has been widely investigated
due to their unique physical and chemical properties.[1,2] Nitroxide radicals have been commonly utilized for spin trapping
and spin labeling applications in electron paramagnetic resonance
(EPR) spectroscopy[3] and for monitoring
cellular redox processes.[4] Nitroxides are
also effective antioxidants in biological systems due to their ability
to react with superoxide radicals.[5] Superoxide,
one of the main reactive oxygen species produced in the cell, is a
significant contributor to cellular levels of oxidative stress, a term which describes an imbalance in the concentrations of pro-
and antioxidants. Oxidative stress results in cellular damage due
to the generation of peroxides and free radicals and has been implicated
in cardiovascular aging,[6] Parkinson’s
disease,[7] and Alzheimer’s disease.[8] Nitroxides have shown significant potential as
small molecule antioxidants in mammalian cells due to their broad
distribution and ability to react with and detoxify harmful radical
species.[9−11]As a result of their reactivity toward biologically
relevant radicals,
nitroxides have also found utility as sensitive probes for reactive
oxygen species. Profluorescent nitroxides,[12] which contain a fluorophore closely linked to a nitroxide moiety,
display significantly reduced fluorescence due to efficient quenching
of the excited electronic state of the fluorophore by the nitroxide
radical. Upon reduction, oxidation, or radical trapping, however,
normal fluorophore emission is enabled, making these compounds very
sensitive probes for the detection of free radical species. Profluorescent
nitroxides have been utilized as probes for the detection of the biologically
relevant reductant ascorbic acid[13−17] and the biologically important radical superoxide.[18] Glutathionyl radicals have also been detected by an associated
fluorescence increase of acridine nitroxide profluorescent probes
in cells.[19,20] More recently, a fluorescein-based nitroxide
probe was combined with flow cytometry to highlight the difference
between healthy cells and those undergoing oxidative stress.[21] Depending on the chromophore moiety present
within the profluorescent nitroxide species, the absorption and emission
wavelengths of these probes can be tuned to match specific applications,
such as cellular imaging. Thus, profluorescent nitroxides are extremely
useful tools for monitoring and imaging changes in the redox status
of the cellular environment; however, their use as probes for two-photon
fluorescence microscopy imaging has previously not been investigated.Two-photon fluorescence microscopy is a three-dimensional imaging
technique involving the nonlinear excitation of fluorophores.[22] The application of two-photon excitation to
fluorescence microscopy offers several advantages over conventional
imaging techniques.[23,24] It facilitates deep tissue penetration
with unparalleled spatial resolution and also dramatically reduces
fluorophore photobleaching, which is a common drawback of fluorescence
microscopy.Chang and Cho et al.[25] have demonstrated
the power of employing two-photon imaging of reactive oxygen species
by developing the first two-photon probe for H2O2. Using a carbamate detection mechanism, H2O2 was imaged in live cells and in living tissue at depths ranging
from 90 to 180 μm. The use of two-photon imaging enabled detection
of the probe with single cell resolution at a depth of 120 μm.Considering the inherent advantages associated with two-photon
imaging as showcased by Chang and Cho et al.[25] and the demonstrated ability of nitroxides to detect reactive oxygen
species, we report here the first examples of two-photon profluorescent
nitroxides for the detection and imaging of reactive oxygen species.
The paramagnetic nitroxide present in these probes behaves as a two-photon
fluorescence off–on switch for detection of ROS. Herein, we
report a range of novel profluorescent nitroxides along with their
photophysical properties and examine their applicability as powerful
tools to probe the cellular redox environment using two-photon fluorescence
microscopy (2PFM) imaging. The two-photon measurements reported here
demonstrate the potential use of these probes for imaging the redox
environment in living tissues and provide insights into the role of
oxidative stress in a range of complex disease states such as cancer,
inflammation, and neurodegenerative disorders.
Experimental Section
Synthesis
The synthesis of compounds 1–8 has been previously reported.[26] The dansyl-linked nitroxides 9, 11, 13, and 15 were prepared from dansyl
chloride and the corresponding amino- or hydroxy-substituted nitroxide
using standard coupling techniques, and the corresponding methoxyamines 10, 12, 14, and 16 were
prepared by reaction of the appropriate nitroxide with methyl radicals
formed using Fenton chemistry.[27] The perylene
diimide-linked dinitroxide 17 was prepared from 3,4,9,10-perylenetetracarboxylic
dianhydride and 5-amino-1,1,3,3-tetramethylisoindolin-2-yloxyl, and
the methoxyamine derivative 18 was prepared using Fenton
chemistry from nitroxide 17 using established procedures.[28,29] The novel tetraethyl fluorescein nitroxide 19 was synthesized
using a method similar to that reported for the synthesis of its tetramethyl
analogue.[21] The synthesis and corresponding
characterization data are reported in the Supporting
Information for each new compound (9–20).
Linear Optical Properties
Linear absorption was measured
with an Agilent 8453 UV–vis spectrophotometer. Fluorescence
emission and excitation spectra were measured using a PTI Quantamaster
spectrofluorimeter equipped with a Hamamatsu R928 photomultiplier
tube (PMT). Emission spectra were measured in cyclohexane, CH2Cl2, or water, depending on the solubility of the
compound. Excitation anisotropy spectra were measured with two Glan-Thomson
polarizers in an L-format method in high viscosity solvent (glycerol,
Acros) to avoid reorientation, and in low concentration solutions
(C ∼ 10–6 M) to avoid reabsorption.[30] Fluorescence quantum yields for compounds 1–8 were obtained from measurements at
five different concentrations in cyclohexane using the following equation:where Abs and F denote the absorbance and fluorescence intensity, respectively,
and ∑F denotes the peak area of the fluorescence
spectra, calculated by summation of the fluorescence intensity. Anthracene
(ΦF = 0.36) was used as a standard, and excitation
was performed at 340 nm. Extinction coefficients were calculated from
the obtained absorbance spectra. Fluorescence quantum yields for the
other compounds were similarly determined.Lifetime measurements
were performed using a tunable Ti:sapphire laser system (Coherent
Verdi-V10 and MIRA 900, pulse duration ∼200 fs/pulse (fwhm),
and repetition rate 76 MHz) coupled with a second harmonic generator.
The polarization of the excitation beam was linear and oriented by
the magic angle to avoid molecular reorientation effects. A broad
band-pass filter (400 to 600 nm, or 500 to 700 nm, depending on the
emission range of a compound) was placed in front of an avalanche
photodiode detector (APD, PicoQuant GmbH, LSM_SPAD). Data was acquired
with a PicoQuant time-correlated single photon counting system, PicoHarp300
(see the Supporting Information). The optical
density of all the solutions did not exceed 0.12 at the excitation
wavelength to avoid reabsorption. Measurements were conducted in 10
mm path length quartz cuvettes at room temperature.
Nonlinear Optical Properties
Two-photon absorption
(2PA) measurements were performed using a Coherent Legend Elite system
(amplified Ti:sapphire system) and an optical parametric generator/amplifier
(Coherent OPerA Solo), providing laser pulses of 100 fs (fwhm) duration
with 1 kHz repetition rate (see the Supporting
Information). The system was coupled with a PTI Quantamaster
spectrofluorimeter and R928 PMT. The 2PA spectrum was determined over
a broad spectral region from 580 to 1020 nm by the two-photon induced
fluorescence method using 10–5 M ≤ C ≤ 10–3 M concentration. Solutions
were in a 10 mm quartz cuvette at room temperature relative to rhodamine
B.[31] All linear and nonlinear measurements
were carried out in spectroscopic grade solvents.
Cell Assays
Micelle Encapsulation
A concentrated micelle stock
solution was prepared using 1 mg/mL of the dye by using a small amount
of CH2Cl2 to dissolve the dye. Water was added
with 2 wt % of surfactant (Pluronic F 127 Prill, BASF Corporation)
and stirred overnight. The crude solution was filtered before using.
The concentration of the micelle-encapsulated probe stock solution
was determined via UV–vis spectrophotometry using the molar
absorptivity.
Cell Lines
Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells were purchased
from America Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA). All cells
were incubated at 37 °C in a 95% humidified atmosphere containing
5% CO2 in cell media (RPMI medium with 10% fetal bovine
serum, 1% Pen Strep (penicillin–streptomycin, Invitrogen, Carlsbad,
CA), and 0.75 g of sodium bicarbonate).
Cytotoxicity Assay
CHO cells were prepared for cell
viability studies in 96-well plates (4 × 103 cells
per well that were incubated in 90 μL). The cells were incubated
for an additional 20 h with dyes encapsulated in micelles (7 and 8) and aqueous solution (17 and 18) in different concentrations. Subsequently, 10 μL
of MTS assay (CellTiter 96 Aqueous One Solution reagent) was added
into each well, followed by further incubation for 4 h at 37 °C.
The relative viability of the cells incubated with dyes to untreated
cells was determined by measuring the MTS-formazan absorbance on a
microplate reader (Spectra Max M5, Molecular Devices) at 538 nm with
subtraction of the absorbance of the cell-free blank volume at 538
nm.[32,33] The results from the three individual experiments
were averaged.
Cell Culture and Fixing
CHO cells were placed onto
poly-d-lysine-coated glass coverslips (12 mm, #1) in 24-well
plates, 3 × 104 cells per well (0.5 mL), and the cells
were incubated for 48 h before further use. Diluted hydrogen peroxide
(0.1 mL, 6% solution, Fisher Scientific, diluted with PBS buffer)
was added to induce oxidative stress (to generate free radical species),
and the cells were incubated for 1 h and then washed twice with PBS.
The filtered stock solution of the probe was then diluted with growth
medium, RPMI-1640 with 1% Pen Strep and 0.75 g of sodium bicarbonate
(0.5 mL), and then incubated for 1.5 h. The cells were incubated for
additional 30 min for staining with commercial dyes individually.
The stains used were 5 μg/mL of Hoechst 33285 (see Supporting Information) and 5 μM CellROX
Deep Red reagent. After incubation, the cells were washed with phosphate-buffered
solution (PBS) five times and fixed using 3.7% formaldehyde solution
for 15 min at 37 °C. Then freshly prepared NaBH4 (1
mg/mL) solution in PBS (PBS pH = 7.4, with a couple of drops of 0.1
M NaOH = pH 8) was added to each well (0.5 mL/well) for 15 min and
washed with PBS (×3), and this procedure was repeated once more.
The plates were then washed with PBS (×2) and water (×1).
NaBH4 was added to reduce autofluorescence (a general protocol)
of the fixing medium. No fluorescence was observed in controls in
which no H2O2 was added, only incubation with
the nitroxide probe, see, e.g., Figures 6a and 7a. Results using RPMI or RPMI with serum media were
essentially the same. Finally, the glass coverslips were mounted using
Prolong Gold mounting media (Invitrogen) for microscopy.
One- and Two-Photon Fluorescence Microscopy (1PFM and 2PFM)
Imaging
A Leica TCS SP5MP confocal microscope system coupled
to Coherent Chameleon Vision S Ti:sapphire laser (∼70 fs (fwhm),
90 MHz repetition rate) was used for one-photon fluorescence microscopy
(1PFM) and 2PFM imaging with a 63× water immersion objective
(Leica 506279). Visible lasers in the TCS SP5 system were employed
for 1PFM while the Coherent Chameleon system was used for 2PFM imaging.
Leica LAS AF software was used for capturing and processing images.
The excitation wavelength for nitroxides 7 and 17 was 458 nm using an argon laser, while emission was collected
from 500 to 600 nm. A HeNe laser (633 nm) was used for exciting the
commercial CellROX Deep Red probe while collecting the emission between
650 and 750 nm. Each image was obtained frame by frame at different
wavelengths.
Results and Discussion
Synthesis and Physical Properties of Nitroxides
The
nitroxide probes were prepared by the reaction of dansyl chloride
with the appropriate amino nitroxide in DCM in the presence of base
to give the desired dansyl-linked nitroxides 9, 11, 13, and 15 in good yield (65–85%).
The methyl ether analogues 10, 12, 14, and 16 were obtained using Fenton chemistry
by the reaction of the nitroxides 9, 11, 13, and 15 with methyl radicals generated from
dimethyl sulfoxide and hydrogen peroxide. The absorbance spectra and
extinction coefficients of the prepared compounds were characteristic
of the dansyl fluorophore (Table 1). A comparison
of the fluorescence of the nitroxides and their corresponding methoxyamine
analogues revealed a substantial fluorescence suppression (10–23
fold) arising from the presence of the nitroxide radical. This effect
was confirmed by the measured quantum yields shown in Table 1.
Table 1
Linear Photophysical Properties of
the Nitroxide Radicals and Their Methoxyamine Derivativesa
λAbsmax and λAbsmax refer to absorption and
emission maximum, respectively, Δλ denotes the Stokes
shift, φFL denotes fluorescence quantum yield, τFL (ns) is fluorescence lifetime, χ2 refers
to correlation coefficient φFL, (NOMe/NO·) is
the fluorescence quantum yield ratio of the methoxy (NOMe) to nitroxide
(NO·), and R is fluorescence excitation anisotropy.
Linear Photophysical Properties
A relatively comprehensive
investigation of the linear photophysical properties (Table 1) of 10 pairs of nitroxide radicals and their corresponding
methoxyamine analogues (Figure 1) was conducted.
Most compounds were soluble in cyclohexane (CHX) and dichloromethane
(CH2Cl2). Perylene derivatives 17 and 18 were insoluble in CHX. Hence, spectroscopic
studies for these compounds were conducted in CH2Cl2. Finally, because of their water solubility, measurements
of the fluorescein derivatives 19 and 20 were carried out in water. The photophysical properties for diphenylanthracene
derivatives (1–4) and bis(phenylethynyl)
derivatives (5–8) have been previously
reported.[26] Herein, further investigation
was performed to determine their feasibility as probes for bioimaging.
Diphenylanthracene derivatives 1–4 exhibited absorption maximum at ca. 375 nm in both CHX and CH2Cl2. The emission maxima were ca. 410 and 430 nm
in CHX and CH2Cl2, respectively (see Supporting Information for absorption and emission
spectra). As expected, there was a large Stokes shift (up to 55 nm)
in the more polar solvent. Bis(phenylethynyl) derivatives 5–8 had absorption maxima of 452 and 465 nm in
CHX and CH2Cl2, respectively. Emission maxima
were 475 and 480 nm in CHX and CH2Cl2, respectively.
Two types of dansyl derivatives were prepared; dansyl sulfonamides 9–12 and dansyl sulfonates 13–16. The main absorption and emission maxima
for both types were ca. 340 and 470 nm, respectively, in CHX, and
350 and 510 nm, respectively, in CH2Cl2. The
absorption and emission maxima of the perylene derivatives 17 and 18 were 526 and 534 nm in CH2Cl2, respectively, while those for the fluorescein derivatives 19 and 20 were at 490 and ca. 520 nm, respectively.
Figure 1
Molecular
structures of nitroxide and methoxyamine derivatives.
The fluorescence quantum yields (φFL) of nitroxides
(Table 1) were low, starting from as little
as 0.009 (17) and reaching 0.126 (13), while
the φFL of the nonradical methoxyamine (NOMe) derivatives
were higher starting from 0.25 (18) and reaching 1.0
(2). The ratio of φFL for the nitroxides
and their corresponding nonradical methoxyamines was relatively large
for the diphenylanthracene derivatives (1–4) and for the bis(phenylethynyl) derivatives (5–8) displaying >50-fold increase in brightness
(i.e., 7 and 8, φFL = 0.011
and 0.75, respectively, giving a 68 fold increase, and for 3 and 4, the ratio was 57). The φFL ratio
of the nitroxide compared to the nonradical methoxyamine derivative
models the relative fluorescence increase that would occur when a
nitroxide reacts with reactive oxygen species generated in the cell.
Dansyl sulfonamides 9–12 and dansyl
sulfonates 13–16 exhibited up to
∼25-fold increase (i.e., 11 and 12, φFL = 0.022 and 0.58, respectively, φFL(NOMe/NO·) = 26). Because the fluorescence lifetime
(τ) is proportional to φFL, the nitroxides
display a significantly shorter τ than the NOMe derivatives
(e.g., τ for 1 and 2 in dichloromethane
= 0.05 and 5.44 ns, respectively). As a result, the trends for the
pairs of nitroxide radical and methoxyamine derivatives were as follows:
(1) the fluorescence quantum yield of the methoxyamines were up to
almost 70-fold higher than the corresponding nitroxide (see, e.g., 7 vs 8 and 5 vs 6),
and (2) the measured fluorescence lifetimes correlated well with the
calculated fluorescence quantum yields. Notably, the lifetimes of
the methoxyamines were up to 2 orders of magnitude greater than the
corresponding nitroxide, (e.g., 1 and 2).
Paramagnetic species are recognized as fluorescence quenchers with
the decrease in fluorescence arising from rapid excited-state intersystem
conversion allowed by changes in the spin multiplicity of the electronic
states followed by nonradiative energy loss.[34] However, once this paramagnetic character is removed, i.e., through
conversion to the methoxyamine derivative, high fluorescence efficiency
is restored as demonstrated by the large fluorescence quantum yields
for the nonradical alkylated analogues.The diphenylanthracene 1–4 and
dansyl derivatives 9–16 possess not
only short wavelength absorption bands, but also exhibit low two-photon
absorptivity.[35] Perylene derivatives 17 and 18 possess a longer wavelength absorption
maximum, and the φFL(NOMe/NO·) ratio is relatively
high. However, the fluorescence quantum yield of the corresponding
methoxyamine derivative 18 was lower than that observed
for other methoxyamines. Of the bis(phenylethynyl) derivatives, compounds 5 and 7 are promising candidates for two-photon
excitation imaging probes. Nitroxide 7 was selected because
the monofunctionality simplifies analyses relative to dinitroxide 5, and its φFL(8 NOMe/7 NO·) ratio was high (∼70 fold). Though the φFL(20 NOMe/19 NO·) ratio for
fluorescein derivatives 19 and 20 was only
6.6, their absorption and emission were at relatively long wavelengths,
and they were also water-soluble, making them reasonable candidates
for bioimaging. Therefore, due to their high fluorescence quantum
yields along with 2PA spectra and cross sections, bis(phenylethynyl)
derivative 7 and the fluorescein derivative 19 were examined as potential probes for two-photon fluorescence bioimaging.Molecular
structures of nitroxide and methoxyamine derivatives.λAbsmax and λAbsmax refer to absorption and
emission maximum, respectively, Δλ denotes the Stokes
shift, φFL denotes fluorescence quantum yield, τFL (ns) is fluorescence lifetime, χ2 refers
to correlation coefficient φFL, (NOMe/NO·) is
the fluorescence quantum yield ratio of the methoxy (NOMe) to nitroxide
(NO·), and R is fluorescence excitation anisotropy.When exposed to free radical
species, such as the products of oxidative damage in cells, nitroxides
may trap other free radicals, typically forming alkoxyamine (NOR)
species. They may also be metabolized to nonradical hydroxylamines
(i.e., R = H) at rates reflecting the oxidative status
of the cell.[21] Figure 2 shows the potential transformations of nitroxides in biological
systems.[10,36]Fluorophore nitroxide compounds typically
possess very low fluorescence quantum yields. On the other hand, their
related diamagnetic adducts (R2NOR) fluoresce normally.
Thus, the presence of the nitroxide can serve as a ‘switch’
for the fluorophore, turning off the fluorescence. Switching on the
fluorescence would occur following the reaction of the nitroxide with
another radical species or alternatively through redox chemistry (oxidation/reduction)
to give diamagnetic, nonquenching species. Therefore, although the
profluorescent nitroxide is incubated with cells, the methoxyamine
derivative is also very useful, as it serves as a model of the fluorescent
reaction products that are detected. Consequently, it is important
to examine the two-photon absorption spectra of the methoxyamine derivatives,
as this provides insight into the behavior of switched-on probe molecules.
Figure 2
Possible
reactions of nitroxides in biological systems.[36]
Possible
reactions of nitroxides in biological systems.[36]Figure 3 displays four different
spectra:
absorption (black line, normalized spectra), emission (blue, normalized
spectra), anisotropy (green), and two-photon absorption (2PA) cross
section (half-filled red circle). The 2PA cross section unit of measure
is a value referred to as a GM unit (1 GM (Göppert Meyer) =
10–50 cm4 s/photon–1). The 2PA spectra were recorded in 20 nm increments from 590 to
1030 nm corresponding to the top X-axis and right Y-axis.
Figure 3
(a) Linear and nonlinear optical spectra of compound 8 and (b) linear and nonlinear optical spectra of compound 20. In each graph, the linear absorption spectrum is a black
line,
the emission spectrum is a blue line, fluorescence anisotropy is green,
and two-photon absorption (2PA) cross sections are shown as half-filled
red circles, respectively.
The 2PA cross sections of methoxyamine derivatives 8 and 20 were measured using a Coherent Legend
Elite
system (an amplified Ti:sapphire laser system) coupled with an OPerA
Solo optical parametric amplifier (∼100 fs (fwhm), 1 kHz repetition
rate). The equation used for calculation of the 2PA cross section
calculation iswhere the subscripts r and s refer to the reference and
sample, respectively, Φ is the fluorescence quantum yield, C is the concentration, F is the integrated
area of the main fluorescent band, n is the refractive
index of the solvent, and P is the incident power
of the laser. The experimental fluorescence excitation and detection
were measured under conditions with negligible reabsorption (close
to the cuvette wall).[30] Excitation anisotropy
is correlated with the spectral position of various electronic transitions,
and can be a very useful tool to estimate the position of 2PA allowed
transitions.[37,38] The one-photon allowed S0–S1 electronic transition (the maximum of
the linear of absorption spectrum) is formally two-photon forbidden
according to quantum mechanical selection rules and vice versa. In
the case of the bis(phenylethynyl) derivative 8, the
anisotropy spectrum is well correlated with the 2PA cross section
data as shown in Figure 3a. The two maxima
in the anisotropy spectrum ca. 320 and 440 nm in Figure 3a indicate two possible electronic transitions. The lower
energy two-photon transition is formally forbidden (see discussion
below), with 2PA less than that of the higher energy
two-photon allowed transition (∼500 GM at 670 nm in CHX). Formally,
one-photon allowed transitions are two-photon forbidden according
to quantum mechanical selction rules. However, this is predicated
on a centrosymmetric system. Large organic molecules seldom possess
such high symmetry. Thus, for large organic molecules, two-photon
absorption into the one-photon allowed transition that is formally
two-photon forbidden often occurs due to the relaxed symmetry of the
molecule. Such is the case for 8 and 20 due
to their low molecular symmetry. The highest 2PA cross section for
20 was ∼400 GM at 970 nm in water (pH 8, adjusted
with NaOH). Even though the 2PA cross section value of 20 is lower than that of compound 8, it is still significant
due to the desirably long wavelength that can afford deep tissue penetration
for ex vivo and in vivo imaging. Hence, 19 is a potentially useful
two-photon NIR probe.(a) Linear and nonlinear optical spectra of compound 8 and (b) linear and nonlinear optical spectra of compound 20. In each graph, the linear absorption spectrum is a black
line,
the emission spectrum is a blue line, fluorescence anisotropy is green,
and two-photon absorption (2PA) cross sections are shown as half-filled
red circles, respectively.
Cytotoxicity
A Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell line
was used for cell viability estimation based on measuring the MTS-formazan
absorbance on a plate reader.[32,33] The MTS-formazan absorbance
wavelength was observed at 538 nm (not the typical 490 nm) due to
overlap with the absorbance of the sample. Hydrogen peroxide was used
to induce oxidative stress.[36] Since the
concentration of hydrogen peroxide is critical in cell viability,
the cytotoxicity of hydrogen peroxide was measured, as shown in Figure 4. Cell viability was reasonable until 100 μM
H2O2, and the damage increased rapidly, consistent
with a previous report.[36] When the concentration
of H2O2 reached 500 μM, the cell viability
was less than 10%.
Figure 4
Cell viability evaluation as a function of H2O2 concentration after 1 h incubation.
Cell viability evaluation as a function of H2O2 concentration after 1 h incubation.Compounds 7 and 8 were
used to prepare
micelle mixtures using 2 wt % of surfactant (Pluronic F 127 Prill)
for solubility and biocompatibility. The samples were filtered before
use. Cell viability in the presence of H2O2 using
micelle mixtures of 7 and 8 can be seen
in Figure 5a and was above 90% at concentrations
up to 50 μM. At concentrations of 5, 10, and 20 μM, nitroxide 7 induces modest enhancement of cell viability, reflecting
a potential beneficial antioxidant action at these lower doses.
Figure 5
Comparative
cell viability of (a) nitroxide 7, 7 + 100
μM H2O2, and methoxyamine
analogue 8, and (b) nitroxide 19, 19 + 100 μM H2O2, and methoxyamine
analogue 20.
The use of the nitroxide compounds 7 and 19 as oxidative stress probes was then investigated.[39] Hydrogen peroxide was added just prior to incubation with
the nitroxide probe to generate free radical species. Thus, the probe
reacts with reactive oxygen species (free radicals) generated by the
hydrogen peroxide incubation. The interaction of a nitroxide with
hydrogen peroxide does not affect the spin, and so the fluorescence
is not switched on by exposure to H2O2, as demonstrated
by control reactions for nitroxides 7 and 19 in the presence of 200 μM H2O2 with
no change observed in the UV–vis absorption spectrum after
4 h. So fluorescence generation from the probes in the cells treated
by hydrogen peroxide reflects impacts on the cellular redox status
by the peroxide and ROS generated from the cells by the peroxide.After oxidative stress was generated by incubation of the cells
with 100 μM H2O2 for 1 h, washing twice
with PBS, and the incubation with nitroxide 7 dissolved
in RPMI-1640 for 1.5 h, cell viability was determined. The procedure
is detailed in the Experimental Section. At
the highest dose (50 μM), cell viability decreased by 25% compared
to cells which were not treated with compound 7. However,
at doses below 50 μM, at least 80% of the cells remained viable,
and at doses of 20 μM or less, cell viability was unchanged
or even enhanced. Consequently, at lower doses cell viability does
not appear to be an issue for compound 7, although the
optimal concentration for this probe was not determined.Compounds 19 and 20 were used after dissolving
in ultrapure water followed by filtration. Figure 5b illustrates the cell viability using these two probes. Nitroxide 19 exhibited a trend similar to that for 7, in
which the cell viability remained high and even boosted the cell growth
at low concentrations of nitroxide. The therapeutic limit for 19 and 20 appeared to be reached with the use
of 100 μM H2O2 to generate oxidative stress.
Above the threshold, the two compounds exhibited a synergistic effect
to destroy cells such that the apparent toxicity increased up to 50%.
From these experiments, it was determined that 20 μM 19 and 100 μM H2O2 can be used for cell
culture (to maintain ∼80% cell viability within experimental
error range). Compound 20, the methoxyamine analogue
of 19, was relatively toxic to the CHO cells. Hence,
only 5 μM dye was utilized to decrease any possible toxicity
from the fluorescent radical adducts arising from 19.Comparative
cell viability of (a) nitroxide 7, 7 + 100
μM H2O2, and methoxyamine
analogue 8, and (b) nitroxide 19, 19 + 100 μM H2O2, and methoxyamine
analogue 20.
1PFM and 2PFM Images
On the basis of the cell viability
results described above along with luminescence quantum yields and
2PA cross sections, 5 μM and 10 μM concentrations of both
nitroxides 7 and 19 were selected for investigation
as potential two-photon fluorescent oxidative stress indicators. Nitroxides 7 and 19 were incubated in CHO cells for 2 h.
Figure 6 shows the one-photon
fluorescence microscopy (1PFM) images of CHO cells incubated with
nitroxide 7. The first row is the comparison of (a) the
control (0 μM 7) vs (b) 5 μM 7, none of which had any H2O2 added, and increasing
concentrations of oxidative stress inducer ((c) 100 μM H2O2 and (d) 200 μM H2O2). The second row shows the structure of the compound, (e) a combination
of increased probe concentration and (f and g) increasing concentrations
of oxidative stress inducer (H2O2). As anticipated,
increases in fluorescence were observed for increases either in the
concentration of the probe and H2O2. In Figure 6, panels b–d, a 5 μM concentration
of the probe was used while for panels e–g, the probe concentration
was 10 μM. The fluoresecence increased with increasing probe
concentration (compare (b) 5 μM and (e) 10 μM). Also,
when the concentration of the H2O2 was increased
from (c) 100 μM to (d) 200 μM, while maintaining constant
probe concentration, an increase in fluorescence was observed. This
indicates that the nitroxide probe exhibits brighter fluorescence
as a function of concentration (i.e., it is sensitive for the quantity
of the probe), and brighter fluorescence is observed at higher oxidative
stress levels (i.e., it exhibits sensitivity for oxidative stress).
These results support the reaction of species, generated by the action
of H2O2 on cells, with profluorescent nitroxide
probe 7, and thereby generating fluorescent NOR analogues
(similar to 8) that may be visualized by 1PFM. Therefore,
the result shows that nitroxides 7 and 19 are good oxidative stress indicators.1PFM image using nitroxide 7 and CHO cells: (a) 0
μM 7 + 0 μM H2O2 (control),
(b) 5 μM 7 + 0 μM H2O2, (c) 5 μM 7 + 100 μM H2O2, (d) 5 μM 7 + 200 μM H2O2, (e) 10 μM 7 + 0 μM H2O2, (f) 10 μM 7 + 100 μM
H2O2, and (g) 10 μM 7 + 200
μM H2O2.The response observed for nitroxide 7 was also seen
with nitroxide 19, as shown in Figure 7. The fluorescence intensity increased
at higher probe concentration and higher levels of oxidative stress
induced through the addition of H2O2. Notably
previous studies[21] with profluorescent
nitroxides have shown that there is no direct interaction between
H2O2 and the nitroxide at these concentrations,
implicating a cellular response mediating this fluorescence increase.
Even though the fluorescence quantum yield of nitroxide 19 is significantly higher than nitroxide 7, the difference
in the fluorescence quantum yields of nitroxide 19 and
the corresponding NOMe analogue 20 is sufficient and
clearly evident in Figure 7 (compare panel b with
panels c and d, or panel e with panels f and g) and is related to
the H2O2 stress-inducer concentration.1PFM imaging
with nitroxide 19 and CHO cells: (a)
0 μM 19 + 0 μM H2O2 (control), (b) 5 μM 19 + 0 μM H2O2, (c) 5 μM 19 + 100 μM H2O2, (d) 5 μM 19 + 200 μM
H2O2, (e) 10 μM 19 + 0 μM
H2O2, (f) 10 μM 19 + 100
μM H2O2, and (g) 10 μM 19 + 200 μM H2O2.To further support the oxidative stress detection
ability of nitroxide 7, a colocalization study was conducted
with commercially
available oxidative stress probe CellROX Deep Red reagent.[40] 1PFM images of CHO cells costained with CellROX
Deep Red and nitroxide 7 (Figure 8) demonstrated good spatial overlap of the fluorescence from the
nonradical NOR derivatives of 7 and CellROX Deep Red
(see Figure 8d). The excitation wavelength
for imaging of the NOR analogues of 7 was 458 nm while
emission was collected from 500–600 nm. For CellROX Deep Red,
the excitation wavelength was 561 nm and emission was collected from
580 to 650 nm.
Figure 8
Colocalization study in CHO cells using probe 7 with
commercial oxidative stress probe CellROX Deep Red (NOR analogues
of 7: Ex 458 nm/Em 500–600 nm, CellROX Deep Red:
Ex 561/Em 580–650 nm): (a) differential interference contrast
(DIC) image, (b) cells incubated with 10 μM 7,
(c) cells then incubated with 5 μM CellROX Deep Red, and (d)
overlaid images of panels a, b, and c.
Colocalization study in CHO cells using probe 7 with
commercial oxidative stress probe CellROX Deep Red (NOR analogues
of 7: Ex 458 nm/Em 500–600 nm, CellROX Deep Red:
Ex 561/Em 580–650 nm): (a) differential interference contrast
(DIC) image, (b) cells incubated with 10 μM 7,
(c) cells then incubated with 5 μM CellROX Deep Red, and (d)
overlaid images of panels a, b, and c.A similar colocalization study was performed for
nitroxide 19 and CellROX Deep Red, as shown in Figure 9. These results indicate good colocalization, supporting
the
utility of nitroxide 19 as an oxidative stress probe.
For a more quantitative comparison, the colocalization coefficient
was calculated with ImageJ software (Mander’s overlap coefficient).
The presumed NOR derivatives of 7 and 19 each had colocalization coefficients of 96%.
Figure 9
Colocalization study
of nitroxide 19 in CHO cells
with commercial oxidative stress probe CellROX Deep Red (sample: Ex
458 nm/Em 500–600 nm, CellROX Deep Red: Ex 561/Em 580–650
nm): (a) DIC, (b) incubated with 20 μM 19, (c)
then incubated with 5 μM CellROX Deep Red, and (d) overlaid
image of panels a, b, and c.
Colocalization study
of nitroxide 19 in CHO cells
with commercial oxidative stress probe CellROX Deep Red (sample: Ex
458 nm/Em 500–600 nm, CellROX Deep Red: Ex 561/Em 580–650
nm): (a) DIC, (b) incubated with 20 μM 19, (c)
then incubated with 5 μM CellROX Deep Red, and (d) overlaid
image of panels a, b, and c.The NOMe analogues of 7 and 19 (8 and 20, respectively) had
reasonable 2PA cross
sections at 900 nm, a good wavelength for 2PFM due to the generally
high transparency of biological materials in this region. 2PFM in
vitro cell imaging was performed by incubating CHO cells with nitroxide probe 7 or 19 after inducing oxidative stress with H2O2 to demonstrate the potential utility of these new probes
for 2PFM oxidative stress imaging, as shown in Figure 10.
Figure 10
2PFM images from femtosecond excitation at 900 nm of CHO cells
incubated with 10 μM 7 and 200 μM H2O2 of (a) DIC, (b) one 2PFM XY optical slice, (c) 2PFM
3D reconstructed image, and incubated with 20 μM 19 and 200 μM H2O2: (d) DIC, (e) one 2PFM
XY optical slice, (f and g) 2PFM 3D reconstructed image.
2PFM images from femtosecond excitation at 900 nm of CHO cells
incubated with 10 μM 7 and 200 μM H2O2 of (a) DIC, (b) one 2PFM XY optical slice, (c) 2PFM
3D reconstructed image, and incubated with 20 μM 19 and 200 μM H2O2: (d) DIC, (e) one 2PFM
XY optical slice, (f and g) 2PFM 3D reconstructed image.
Conclusion
Ten pairs of nitroxides and their nonradical-containing
methoxyamine
derivatives were examined for their linear and nonlinear photophysical
properties. The nitroxides exhibited profluorescent behavior, i.e.,
their fluorescence quantum yield was significantly higher for the
NOMe analogues, while several displayed reasonably high 2PA cross
section values above 800 nm, making them good candidates as two-photon
fluorescent oxidative stress indicators. Because of their linear absorption,
nonlinear absorption, and fluorescence properties, nitroxides 7 and 19 were selected for further in vitro cell
studies using CHO cells. Cytotoxicity assays indicated that the probes
were benign at concentrations suitable for fluorescence microscopy
imaging. Colocalization experiments in CHO cells after induction of
oxidative stress with H2O2 using a commercial
indicator of cellular oxidative stress, CellROX Deep Red, demonstrated
high colocalization coincidence (96%), supporting the role of the
nitroxide probe as a suitable indicator of oxidative stress (and concomitant
damage) in vitro. 2PFM imaging was conducted for the first time with
a nitroxide oxidative stress probe using probes 7 and 19. The results from this study provide impetus for the further
development of this important class of materials as 2PFM oxidative
stress probes and may lead to a new NIR 2PA probe for investigating
oxidative stress.
Authors: Ayelet M Samuni; William DeGraff; John A Cook; Murali C Krishna; Angelo Russo; James B Mitchell Journal: Free Radic Biol Med Date: 2004-11-15 Impact factor: 7.376
Authors: Lloyd C Murfin; Maria Weber; Sang Jun Park; Won Tae Kim; Carlos M Lopez-Alled; Claire L McMullin; Fabienne Pradaux-Caggiano; Catherine L Lyall; Gabriele Kociok-Köhn; Jannis Wenk; Steven D Bull; Juyoung Yoon; Hwan Myung Kim; Tony D James; Simon E Lewis Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2019-11-27 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Molly A Sowers; Jessica R McCombs; Ying Wang; Joseph T Paletta; Stephen W Morton; Erik C Dreaden; Michael D Boska; M Francesca Ottaviani; Paula T Hammond; Andrzej Rajca; Jeremiah A Johnson Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2014-11-18 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Gang Cheng; Monika Zielonka; Brian Dranka; Suresh N Kumar; Charles R Myers; Brian Bennett; Alexander M Garces; Luiz Gabriel Dias Duarte Machado; David Thiebaut; Olivier Ouari; Micael Hardy; Jacek Zielonka; Balaraman Kalyanaraman Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2018-05-08 Impact factor: 5.157