AIMS: Cyclophosphamide, the precursor to the active 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide, is used in active glomerulonephritis despite limited pharmacokinetics data. The pharmacokinetics of cyclophosphamide and 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide were evaluated. The influence of laboratory and pharmacogenomic covariates on pharmacokinetics was evaluated as a secondary aim. METHODS: Glomerulonephritis patients (n = 23) participated in a pharmacokinetic evaluation. Blood was serially collected and assayed for cyclophosphamide and 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide by LC/MS methods. Kidney function, serum albumin and polymorphisms in drug metabolism or transport genes were evaluated. Analyses included non-compartmental pharmacokinetics and parametric and non-parametric statistics. RESULTS: The mean area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC(0,∞)) data were 110,100 ± 42,900 ng ml(-1) h and 5388 ± 2841 ng ml(-1) h for cyclophosphamide and 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide, respectively. The mean metabolic ratio was 0.06 ± 0.04. A statistically significant relationship was found between increased serum albumin and increased half-life (0.584, P = 0.007, 95% CI 0.176, 0.820) and a borderline relationship with AUC(0,∞) (0.402, P = 0.079, 95% CI -0.064, 0.724) for 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide. Covariate relationships that trended toward significance for cyclophosphamide included decreased serum albumin and increased elimination rate constant (-0.427, P = 0.061, 95% CI 0.738, 0.034), increased urinary protein excretion and increased AUC(0,∞) (-0.392, P = 0.064, 95% CI -0.699 to 0.037), decreased C(max) (0.367, P = 0.085, 95% CI -0.067, 0.684) and decreased plasma clearance (-0.392, P = 0.064, 95% CI -0.699, 0.037). CYP2B6*9 variants vs. wildtype were found to have decreased elimination rate constant (P = 0.0005, 95% CI 0.033, 0.103), increased V(d) (P = 0.0271, 95% CI -57.5, -4.2) and decreased C(max) (P = 0.0176, 95% CI 0.696, 6179) for cyclophosphamide. ABCB1 C3435T variants had a borderline decrease in cyclophosphamide elimination rate constant (P = 0.0858; 95% CI -0.005, 0.102). CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacokinetics of cyclophosphamide and 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide in patients with lupus nephritis and small vessel vasculitis are similar. Clinical and pharmacogenetic covariates alter disposition of cyclophosphamide and 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide. Clinical findings of worsened glomerulonephritis lead to increased exposure to cyclophosphamide vs. the active 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide, which could have relevance in terms of clinical efficacy. The CYP2B6*9 and ABCB1 C3435T polymorphisms alter the pharmacokinetics of cyclophosphamide and 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide in glomerulonephritis.
AIMS: Cyclophosphamide, the precursor to the active 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide, is used in active glomerulonephritis despite limited pharmacokinetics data. The pharmacokinetics of cyclophosphamide and 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide were evaluated. The influence of laboratory and pharmacogenomic covariates on pharmacokinetics was evaluated as a secondary aim. METHODS:Glomerulonephritispatients (n = 23) participated in a pharmacokinetic evaluation. Blood was serially collected and assayed for cyclophosphamide and 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide by LC/MS methods. Kidney function, serum albumin and polymorphisms in drug metabolism or transport genes were evaluated. Analyses included non-compartmental pharmacokinetics and parametric and non-parametric statistics. RESULTS: The mean area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC(0,∞)) data were 110,100 ± 42,900 ng ml(-1) h and 5388 ± 2841 ng ml(-1) h for cyclophosphamide and 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide, respectively. The mean metabolic ratio was 0.06 ± 0.04. A statistically significant relationship was found between increased serum albumin and increased half-life (0.584, P = 0.007, 95% CI 0.176, 0.820) and a borderline relationship with AUC(0,∞) (0.402, P = 0.079, 95% CI -0.064, 0.724) for 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide. Covariate relationships that trended toward significance for cyclophosphamide included decreased serum albumin and increased elimination rate constant (-0.427, P = 0.061, 95% CI 0.738, 0.034), increased urinary protein excretion and increased AUC(0,∞) (-0.392, P = 0.064, 95% CI -0.699 to 0.037), decreased C(max) (0.367, P = 0.085, 95% CI -0.067, 0.684) and decreased plasma clearance (-0.392, P = 0.064, 95% CI -0.699, 0.037). CYP2B6*9 variants vs. wildtype were found to have decreased elimination rate constant (P = 0.0005, 95% CI 0.033, 0.103), increased V(d) (P = 0.0271, 95% CI -57.5, -4.2) and decreased C(max) (P = 0.0176, 95% CI 0.696, 6179) for cyclophosphamide. ABCB1C3435T variants had a borderline decrease in cyclophosphamide elimination rate constant (P = 0.0858; 95% CI -0.005, 0.102). CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacokinetics of cyclophosphamide and 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide in patients with lupus nephritis and small vessel vasculitis are similar. Clinical and pharmacogenetic covariates alter disposition of cyclophosphamide and 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide. Clinical findings of worsened glomerulonephritis lead to increased exposure to cyclophosphamide vs. the active 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide, which could have relevance in terms of clinical efficacy. The CYP2B6*9 and ABCB1C3435T polymorphisms alter the pharmacokinetics of cyclophosphamide and 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide in glomerulonephritis.
Authors: Nita A Limdi; Donna K Arnett; Joyce A Goldstein; T Mark Beasley; Gerald McGwin; Brian K Adler; Ronald T Acton Journal: Pharmacogenomics Date: 2008-05 Impact factor: 2.533
Authors: Nuala A Helsby; Chung-Yee Hui; Michael A Goldthorpe; Janet K Coller; May Ching Soh; Peter J Gow; Janak Z De Zoysa; Malcolm D Tingle Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2010-12 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: D Busse; F W Busch; F Bohnenstengel; M Eichelbaum; P Fischer; J Opalinska; K Schumacher; E Schweizer; H K Kroemer Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1997-05 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Corine Ekhart; Valerie D Doodeman; Sjoerd Rodenhuis; Paul H M Smits; Jos H Beijnen; Alwin D R Huitema Journal: Pharmacogenet Genomics Date: 2008-06 Impact factor: 2.089
Authors: Gerald B Appel; Gabriel Contreras; Mary Anne Dooley; Ellen M Ginzler; David Isenberg; David Jayne; Lei-Shi Li; Eduardo Mysler; Jorge Sánchez-Guerrero; Neil Solomons; David Wofsy Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2009-04-15 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: O Morgan Hall; Cody J Peer; Courtney D Fitzhugh; William D Figg Journal: J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci Date: 2018-04-10 Impact factor: 3.205
Authors: Fariba Navid; Sharyn D Baker; M Beth McCarville; Clinton F Stewart; Catherine A Billups; Jianrong Wu; Andrew M Davidoff; Sheri L Spunt; Wayne L Furman; Lisa M McGregor; Shuiying Hu; John C Panetta; David Turner; Demba Fofana; Wilburn E Reddick; Wing Leung; Victor M Santana Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2012-11-08 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Daniel Heylmann; Martina Bauer; Huong Becker; Stefaan van Gool; Nicole Bacher; Kerstin Steinbrink; Bernd Kaina Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-12-23 Impact factor: 3.240