PURPOSE: To determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicities (DLT), pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of sorafenib, bevacizumab, and low-dose oral cyclophosphamide in children and young adults with recurrent/refractory solid tumors. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Sorafenib dose was escalated from 90 to 110 mg/m(2) twice daily with fixed doses of bevacizumab at 5 mg/kg every 3 weeks and cyclophosphamide at 50 mg/m(2) daily. Once sorafenib's MTD was established, bevacizumab dose was escalated. Each course was of 21 days. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics studies were conducted during the first course. RESULTS: Nineteen patients (11 males; median age, 9.2 years) received a median of four courses (range, 1-23). DLTs during course 1 included grade 3 rash (two), increased lipase (one), anorexia (one), and thrombus (one). With an additional 71 courses of therapy, the most common toxicities ≥ grade 3 included neutropenia (nine), lymphopenia (nine), and rashes (four). Five of 17 evaluable patients had partial tumor responses, and five had disease stabilization (>2 courses). Median day 1 cyclophosphamide apparent oral clearance was 3.13 L/h/m(2). Median day 1 sorafenib apparent oral clearance was 44 and 39 mL/min/m(2) at the 2 dose levels evaluated, and steady-state concentrations ranged from 1.64 to 4.8 mg/L. Inhibition of serum VEGF receptor 2 (VEGFR2) was inversely correlated with sorafenib steady-state concentrations (P = 0.019). CONCLUSION: The recommended phase II doses are sorafenib, 90 mg/m(2) twice daily; bevacizumab, 15 mg/kg q3 weeks; and cyclophosphamide, 50 mg/m(2) once daily. This regimen is feasible with promising evidence of antitumor activity that warrants further investigation.
PURPOSE: To determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicities (DLT), pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of sorafenib, bevacizumab, and low-dose oral cyclophosphamide in children and young adults with recurrent/refractory solid tumors. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN:Sorafenib dose was escalated from 90 to 110 mg/m(2) twice daily with fixed doses of bevacizumab at 5 mg/kg every 3 weeks and cyclophosphamide at 50 mg/m(2) daily. Once sorafenib's MTD was established, bevacizumab dose was escalated. Each course was of 21 days. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics studies were conducted during the first course. RESULTS: Nineteen patients (11 males; median age, 9.2 years) received a median of four courses (range, 1-23). DLTs during course 1 included grade 3 rash (two), increased lipase (one), anorexia (one), and thrombus (one). With an additional 71 courses of therapy, the most common toxicities ≥ grade 3 included neutropenia (nine), lymphopenia (nine), and rashes (four). Five of 17 evaluable patients had partial tumor responses, and five had disease stabilization (>2 courses). Median day 1 cyclophosphamide apparent oral clearance was 3.13 L/h/m(2). Median day 1 sorafenib apparent oral clearance was 44 and 39 mL/min/m(2) at the 2 dose levels evaluated, and steady-state concentrations ranged from 1.64 to 4.8 mg/L. Inhibition of serum VEGF receptor 2 (VEGFR2) was inversely correlated with sorafenib steady-state concentrations (P = 0.019). CONCLUSION: The recommended phase II doses are sorafenib, 90 mg/m(2) twice daily; bevacizumab, 15 mg/kg q3 weeks; and cyclophosphamide, 50 mg/m(2) once daily. This regimen is feasible with promising evidence of antitumor activity that warrants further investigation.
Authors: P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2000-02-02 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Pablo Matar; Federico Rojo; Raúl Cassia; Gema Moreno-Bueno; Serena Di Cosimo; José Tabernero; Marta Guzmán; Sonia Rodriguez; Joaquín Arribas; José Palacios; José Baselga Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2004-10-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Michela Casanova; Andrea Ferrari; Gianni Bisogno; Johannes H M Merks; Gian Luca De Salvo; Cristina Meazza; Katia Tettoni; Massimo Provenzi; Ida Mazzarino; Modesto Carli Journal: Cancer Date: 2004-10-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Shyhmin Huang; Eric A Armstrong; Sergio Benavente; Prakash Chinnaiyan; Paul M Harari Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2004-08-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Christopher G Willett; Yves Boucher; Emmanuelle di Tomaso; Dan G Duda; Lance L Munn; Ricky T Tong; Daniel C Chung; Dushyant V Sahani; Sanjeeva P Kalva; Sergey V Kozin; Mari Mino; Kenneth S Cohen; David T Scadden; Alan C Hartford; Alan J Fischman; Jeffrey W Clark; David P Ryan; Andrew X Zhu; Lawrence S Blaszkowsky; Helen X Chen; Paul C Shellito; Gregory Y Lauwers; Rakesh K Jain Journal: Nat Med Date: 2004-01-25 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Sara M Federico; Kenneth J Caldwell; Mary B McCarville; Vinay M Daryani; Clinton F Stewart; Shenghua Mao; Jianrong Wu; Andrew M Davidoff; Victor M Santana; Wayne L Furman; Alberto S Pappo; Fariba Navid Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2020-04-20 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Hiroto Inaba; John C Panetta; Stanley B Pounds; Lei Wang; Lie Li; Fariba Navid; Sara M Federico; Eric D Eisenmann; Aksana Vasilyeva; Yong-Dong Wang; Sheila Shurtleff; Ching-Hon Pui; Tanja A Gruber; Raul C Ribeiro; Jeffrey E Rubnitz; Sharyn D Baker Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2019-08-27 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Leo Mascarenhas; Yueh-Yun Chi; Pooja Hingorani; James R Anderson; Elizabeth R Lyden; David A Rodeberg; Daniel J Indelicato; Simon C Kao; Roshni Dasgupta; Sheri L Spunt; William H Meyer; Douglas S Hawkins Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2019-09-12 Impact factor: 44.544