Literature DB >> 23143218

Phase I and clinical pharmacology study of bevacizumab, sorafenib, and low-dose cyclophosphamide in children and young adults with refractory/recurrent solid tumors.

Fariba Navid1, Sharyn D Baker, M Beth McCarville, Clinton F Stewart, Catherine A Billups, Jianrong Wu, Andrew M Davidoff, Sheri L Spunt, Wayne L Furman, Lisa M McGregor, Shuiying Hu, John C Panetta, David Turner, Demba Fofana, Wilburn E Reddick, Wing Leung, Victor M Santana.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicities (DLT), pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of sorafenib, bevacizumab, and low-dose oral cyclophosphamide in children and young adults with recurrent/refractory solid tumors. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: Sorafenib dose was escalated from 90 to 110 mg/m(2) twice daily with fixed doses of bevacizumab at 5 mg/kg every 3 weeks and cyclophosphamide at 50 mg/m(2) daily. Once sorafenib's MTD was established, bevacizumab dose was escalated. Each course was of 21 days. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics studies were conducted during the first course.
RESULTS: Nineteen patients (11 males; median age, 9.2 years) received a median of four courses (range, 1-23). DLTs during course 1 included grade 3 rash (two), increased lipase (one), anorexia (one), and thrombus (one). With an additional 71 courses of therapy, the most common toxicities ≥ grade 3 included neutropenia (nine), lymphopenia (nine), and rashes (four). Five of 17 evaluable patients had partial tumor responses, and five had disease stabilization (>2 courses). Median day 1 cyclophosphamide apparent oral clearance was 3.13 L/h/m(2). Median day 1 sorafenib apparent oral clearance was 44 and 39 mL/min/m(2) at the 2 dose levels evaluated, and steady-state concentrations ranged from 1.64 to 4.8 mg/L. Inhibition of serum VEGF receptor 2 (VEGFR2) was inversely correlated with sorafenib steady-state concentrations (P = 0.019).
CONCLUSION: The recommended phase II doses are sorafenib, 90 mg/m(2) twice daily; bevacizumab, 15 mg/kg q3 weeks; and cyclophosphamide, 50 mg/m(2) once daily. This regimen is feasible with promising evidence of antitumor activity that warrants further investigation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23143218      PMCID: PMC3537913          DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-1897

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  45 in total

1.  New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada.

Authors:  P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-02-02       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Cyclophosphamide pharmacokinetics and dose requirements in patients with renal insufficiency.

Authors:  Marion Haubitz; Frank Bohnenstengel; Reinhard Brunkhorst; Matthias Schwab; Ute Hofmann; Dagmar Busse
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 10.612

3.  Decreased half life of cyclophosphamide in patients under continual treatment.

Authors:  M D'Incalci; G Bolis; T Facchinetti; C Mangioni; L Morasca; P Morazzoni; M Salmona
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 9.162

4.  Pharmacokinetics of cyclophosphamide after prolonged low dose treatment in ovarian cancer patients.

Authors:  M D'Incalci; T Facchinetti; G Bolis; C Mangioni; L Morasca
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 2.441

5.  Combined epidermal growth factor receptor targeting with the tyrosine kinase inhibitor gefitinib (ZD1839) and the monoclonal antibody cetuximab (IMC-C225): superiority over single-agent receptor targeting.

Authors:  Pablo Matar; Federico Rojo; Raúl Cassia; Gema Moreno-Bueno; Serena Di Cosimo; José Tabernero; Marta Guzmán; Sonia Rodriguez; Joaquín Arribas; José Palacios; José Baselga
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2004-10-01       Impact factor: 12.531

6.  Cyclophosphamide metabolism in children with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Authors:  S Murray Yule; Lisa Price; Alex D McMahon; Andrew D J Pearson; Alan V Boddy
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 12.531

7.  Vinorelbine and low-dose cyclophosphamide in the treatment of pediatric sarcomas: pilot study for the upcoming European Rhabdomyosarcoma Protocol.

Authors:  Michela Casanova; Andrea Ferrari; Gianni Bisogno; Johannes H M Merks; Gian Luca De Salvo; Cristina Meazza; Katia Tettoni; Massimo Provenzi; Ida Mazzarino; Modesto Carli
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2004-10-01       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Dual-agent molecular targeting of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR): combining anti-EGFR antibody with tyrosine kinase inhibitor.

Authors:  Shyhmin Huang; Eric A Armstrong; Sergio Benavente; Prakash Chinnaiyan; Paul M Harari
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2004-08-01       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  Direct evidence that the VEGF-specific antibody bevacizumab has antivascular effects in human rectal cancer.

Authors:  Christopher G Willett; Yves Boucher; Emmanuelle di Tomaso; Dan G Duda; Lance L Munn; Ricky T Tong; Daniel C Chung; Dushyant V Sahani; Sanjeeva P Kalva; Sergey V Kozin; Mari Mino; Kenneth S Cohen; David T Scadden; Alan C Hartford; Alan J Fischman; Jeffrey W Clark; David P Ryan; Andrew X Zhu; Lawrence S Blaszkowsky; Helen X Chen; Paul C Shellito; Gregory Y Lauwers; Rakesh K Jain
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2004-01-25       Impact factor: 53.440

10.  Metronomic therapy with cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone for prostate carcinoma.

Authors:  L Michael Glode; Albaha Barqawi; Frances Crighton; E David Crawford; Robert Kerbel
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2003-10-15       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  36 in total

1.  Safety of bevacizumab in patients younger than 4 years of age.

Authors:  N C Millan; M J Poveda; O Cruz; J Mora
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2015-08-29       Impact factor: 3.405

2.  Phase I expansion cohort to evaluate the combination of bevacizumab, sorafenib and low-dose cyclophosphamide in children and young adults with refractory or recurrent solid tumours.

Authors:  Sara M Federico; Kenneth J Caldwell; Mary B McCarville; Vinay M Daryani; Clinton F Stewart; Shenghua Mao; Jianrong Wu; Andrew M Davidoff; Victor M Santana; Wayne L Furman; Alberto S Pappo; Fariba Navid
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 9.162

3.  Safety of ultrasound contrast agents in the pediatric oncologic population: a single-institution experience.

Authors:  Jamie L Coleman; Fariba Navid; Wayne L Furman; M Beth McCarville
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 4.  Immunotherapy in pediatric malignancies: current status and future perspectives.

Authors:  Christian M Capitini; Mario Otto; Kenneth B DeSantes; Paul M Sondel
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.404

Review 5.  Future directions in the treatment of osteosarcoma.

Authors:  Michael W Bishop; Katherine A Janeway; Richard Gorlick
Journal:  Curr Opin Pediatr       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.856

6.  Sorafenib Population Pharmacokinetics and Skin Toxicities in Children and Adolescents with Refractory/Relapsed Leukemia or Solid Tumor Malignancies.

Authors:  Hiroto Inaba; John C Panetta; Stanley B Pounds; Lei Wang; Lie Li; Fariba Navid; Sara M Federico; Eric D Eisenmann; Aksana Vasilyeva; Yong-Dong Wang; Sheila Shurtleff; Ching-Hon Pui; Tanja A Gruber; Raul C Ribeiro; Jeffrey E Rubnitz; Sharyn D Baker
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 12.531

7.  Randomized Phase II Trial of Bevacizumab or Temsirolimus in Combination With Chemotherapy for First Relapse Rhabdomyosarcoma: A Report From the Children's Oncology Group.

Authors:  Leo Mascarenhas; Yueh-Yun Chi; Pooja Hingorani; James R Anderson; Elizabeth R Lyden; David A Rodeberg; Daniel J Indelicato; Simon C Kao; Roshni Dasgupta; Sheri L Spunt; William H Meyer; Douglas S Hawkins
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-09-12       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 8.  Angiogenesis inhibitors in cancer therapy: mechanistic perspective on classification and treatment rationales.

Authors:  Asmaa E El-Kenawi; Azza B El-Remessy
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 8.739

9.  Use of Quantitative Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound to Assess Response to Antiangiogenic Therapy in Children and Adolescents With Solid Malignancies: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  M Beth McCarville; Jamie L Coleman; Junyu Guo; Yimei Li; Xingyu Li; Patricia J Honnoll; Andrew M Davidoff; Fariba Navid
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 10.  Discovery of Cell-Surface Vimentin (CSV) as a Sarcoma Target and Development of CSV-Targeted IL12 Immune Therapy.

Authors:  Izhar S Batth; Shulin Li
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 2.622

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.