AIMS: Functional tests have demonstrated minimal loss of vaginal closure force with age. So we tested the null hypotheses that age neither affects the maximum cross-sectional area (CSA) nor the volume of the levator muscle. Corresponding hypotheses were also tested in the adjacent obturator internus muscle, which served as a control for the effect of age on appendicular muscle in these women. METHODS: Magnetic resonance images of 15 healthy younger (aged 21-25 years) and 12 healthy older nulliparous women (aged >63 years) were selected to avoid the confounding effect of childbirth. Models were created from tracing outlines of the levator ani muscle in the coronal plane, and obturator internus in the axial plane using 3D Slicer v. 3.4. Muscle volumes were calculated using Slicer, while CSA was measured using Imageware™ at nine locations. The hypotheses were tested using repeated measures analysis of variance with P < 0.05 being considered significant. RESULTS: The effect of age did not reach statistical significance for the decrease in levator ani muscle maximum CSA or the decrease in volume (4.3%, P = 0.62 and 10.9%, 0.12, respectively). However, age did significantly adversely decrease obturator internus muscle maximum CSA and volume (24.5% and 28.2%, P < 0.001, respectively). Significant local age-related changes were observed dorsally in both muscles. CONCLUSIONS: Unlike the adjacent appendicular muscle, obturator internus, the levator ani muscle in healthy nullipara does not show evidence of significant age-related atrophy.
AIMS: Functional tests have demonstrated minimal loss of vaginal closure force with age. So we tested the null hypotheses that age neither affects the maximum cross-sectional area (CSA) nor the volume of the levator muscle. Corresponding hypotheses were also tested in the adjacent obturator internus muscle, which served as a control for the effect of age on appendicular muscle in these women. METHODS: Magnetic resonance images of 15 healthy younger (aged 21-25 years) and 12 healthy older nulliparous women (aged >63 years) were selected to avoid the confounding effect of childbirth. Models were created from tracing outlines of the levator ani muscle in the coronal plane, and obturator internus in the axial plane using 3D Slicer v. 3.4. Muscle volumes were calculated using Slicer, while CSA was measured using Imageware™ at nine locations. The hypotheses were tested using repeated measures analysis of variance with P < 0.05 being considered significant. RESULTS: The effect of age did not reach statistical significance for the decrease in levator ani muscle maximum CSA or the decrease in volume (4.3%, P = 0.62 and 10.9%, 0.12, respectively). However, age did significantly adversely decrease obturator internus muscle maximum CSA and volume (24.5% and 28.2%, P < 0.001, respectively). Significant local age-related changes were observed dorsally in both muscles. CONCLUSIONS: Unlike the adjacent appendicular muscle, obturator internus, the levator ani muscle in healthy nullipara does not show evidence of significant age-related atrophy.
Authors: Daniel M Morgan; Gurpreet Kaur; Yvonne Hsu; Dee E Fenner; Kenneth Guire; Janis Miller; James A Ashton-Miller; John O L Delancey Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2005-05 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Rebecca U Margulies; Yvonne Hsu; Rohna Kearney; Tamara Stein; Wolfgang H Umek; John O L DeLancey Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2006-05 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: John O L DeLancey; Daniel M Morgan; Dee E Fenner; Rohna Kearney; Kenneth Guire; Janis M Miller; Hero Hussain; Wolfgang Umek; Yvonne Hsu; James A Ashton-Miller Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2007-02 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Paige V Tracy; Alan S Wineman; Francisco J Orejuela; Susan M Ramin; John O L DeLancey; James A Ashton-Miller Journal: J Mech Behav Biomed Mater Date: 2017-12-30
Authors: Paige V Tracy; Shreya Wadhwani; Jourdan Triebwasser; Alan S Wineman; Francisco J Orejuela; Susan M Ramin; John O DeLancey; James A Ashton-Miller Journal: J Biomech Date: 2018-04-25 Impact factor: 2.712
Authors: Lieschen H Quiroz; Stephanie D Pickett; Jennifer D Peck; Ghazaleh Rostaminia; Daniel E Stone; S Abbas Shobeiri Journal: Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg Date: 2017 Mar/Apr Impact factor: 2.091
Authors: G Rostaminia; J Manonai; E Leclaire; F Omoumi; M Marchiorlatti; L H Quiroz; S A Shobeiri Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2013-12-13 Impact factor: 2.894
Authors: Anne G Sammarco; David D Sheyn; Tessa E Krantz; Cedric K Olivera; Antonio A Rodrigues; Ms Emily K Kobernik; Mariana Masteling; John O Delancey Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2019-08-08 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Lori J Tuttle; Olivia T Nguyen; Mark S Cook; Marianna Alperin; Sameer B Shah; Samuel R Ward; Richard L Lieber Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2013-08-01 Impact factor: 2.894
Authors: Marianna Alperin; Mark Cook; Lori J Tuttle; Mary C Esparza; Richard L Lieber Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2016-03-05 Impact factor: 8.661