Literature DB >> 15902185

Does vaginal closure force differ in the supine and standing positions?

Daniel M Morgan1, Gurpreet Kaur, Yvonne Hsu, Dee E Fenner, Kenneth Guire, Janis Miller, James A Ashton-Miller, John O L Delancey.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to quantify resting vaginal closure force (VCF(REST)), maximum vaginal closure force (VCF(MAX)), and augmentation of vaginal closure force augmentation (VCF(AUG)) when supine and standing and to determine whether the change in intra-abdominal pressure associated with change in posture accounts for differences in VCF. STUDY
DESIGN: Thirty-nine asymptomatic, continent women were recruited to determine, when supine and standing, the vaginal closure force (eg, the force closing the vagina in the mid-sagittal plane) and bladder pressures at rest and at maximal voluntary contraction. VCF was measured with an instrumented vaginal speculum and bladder pressure was determined with a microtip catheter. VCF(REST) was the resting pelvic floor tone, and VCF(MAX) was the peak pelvic floor force during a maximal voluntary contraction. VCF(AUG) was the difference between VCF(MAX) and VCF(REST). T tests and Pearson correlation coefficients were used for analysis.
RESULTS: VCF(REST) when supine was 3.6 +/- 0.8 N and when standing was 6.9 +/- 1.5 N--a 92% difference (P < .001). The VCF(MAX) when supine was 7.5 +/- 2.9 N and when standing was 10.1 +/- 2.4 N--a 35% difference (P < .001). Bladder pressure when supine (10.5 +/- 4.7 cm H2O) was significantly less (P < .001) than when standing (31.0 +/- 6.4 cm H2O). The differences in bladder pressure when either supine or standing did not correlate with the corresponding differences in VCF at rest or at maximal voluntary contraction. The supine VCF(AUG) of 3.9 +/- 2.7 N, was significantly greater than the standing VCF(AUG) of 3.3+/-1.9 N.
CONCLUSION: With change in posture, vaginal closure force increases because of higher intra-abdominal pressure and greater resistance in the pelvic floor muscles.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15902185     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.11.050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  16 in total

1.  Ultrasound evaluation of dynamic responses of female pelvic floor muscles.

Authors:  Qiyu Peng; Ruth Jones; Keiichi Shishido; Christos E Constantinou
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.998

2.  Test-retest reliability of an instrumented speculum for measuring vaginal closure force.

Authors:  J M Miller; J A Ashton-Miller; D Perruchini; J O L DeLancey
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.696

3.  Vaginal high-pressure zone assessed by dynamic 3-dimensional ultrasound images of the pelvic floor.

Authors:  Sung-Ae Jung; Dolores H Pretorius; Bikram S Padda; Milena M Weinstein; Charles W Nager; Derkina J den Boer; Ravinder K Mittal
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  A comparison of the effect of age on levator ani and obturator internus muscle cross-sectional areas and volumes in nulliparous women.

Authors:  Vikky C Morris; Meghan P Murray; John O L Delancey; James A Ashton-Miller
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 2.696

5.  Interaction among apical support, levator ani impairment, and anterior vaginal wall prolapse.

Authors:  Luyun Chen; James A Ashton-Miller; Yvonne Hsu; John O L DeLancey
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Differences in continence system between community-dwelling black and white women with and without urinary incontinence in the EPI study.

Authors:  John O L DeLancey; Dee E Fenner; Ken Guire; Divya A Patel; Denise Howard; Janis M Miller
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 7.  On the biomechanics of vaginal birth and common sequelae.

Authors:  James A Ashton-Miller; John O L Delancey
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 9.590

8.  Stress urinary incontinence: relative importance of urethral support and urethral closure pressure.

Authors:  John O L DeLancey; Elisa R Trowbridge; Janis M Miller; Daniel M Morgan; Kenneth Guire; Dee E Fenner; William J Weadock; James A Ashton-Miller
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Vaginal birth and de novo stress incontinence: relative contributions of urethral dysfunction and mobility.

Authors:  John O L DeLancey; Janis M Miller; Rohna Kearney; Denise Howard; Pranathi Reddy; Wolfgang Umek; Kenneth E Guire; Rebecca U Margulies; James A Ashton-Miller
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  Validity and reliability of an instrumented speculum designed to minimize the effect of intra-abdominal pressure on the measurement of pelvic floor muscle strength.

Authors:  James A Ashton-Miller; Ruth Zielinski; John O L DeLancey; Janis M Miller
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 2.063

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.