Literature DB >> 22378485

Percutaneous left ventricular assist device with TandemHeart for high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: the Mayo Clinic experience.

Oluseun O Alli1, Inder M Singh, David R Holmes, Juan N Pulido, Soon J Park, Charanjit S Rihal.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In patients with poor left ventricular function and severe left main or multivessel coronary disease, coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery has been the preferred therapy. However, a number of these patients are either inoperable or poor surgical candidates due to comorbid conditions and previous cardiac surgical procedures. These patients are generally poor candidates for standard percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) techniques. A hybrid PCI approach with hemodynamic support may be a viable strategy for these patients. We report our experience using the TandemHeart percutaneous left ventricular assist device during high-risk PCI.
METHODS: Retrospective cross-sectional analysis of prospectively collected data in 54 patients undergoing high-risk PCI using the TandemHeart device for support. Hemodynamic and clinical data were collected and analyzed.
RESULTS: Baseline clinical characteristics were as follows: mean age 72 ± 1.7 years, males 78%, median ejection fraction 20%, mean serum creatinine 1.6 ± 0.3 2 mg/dL, recent myocardial infarction 52%, COPD 33%, previous CABG 50%, diabetes mellitus 41%, and hypertension 83%. The median SYNTAX score was 33, and the median Jeopardy score was 10. The predicted surgical revascularization mortality was 13% by the Society for Thoracic Surgery risk score and 33% by Euroscore. There was a significant decrease in right and left heart pressures (P < 0.05) with a concomitant increase in the cardiac output from 4.7 to 5.7 L/min (P = 0.03) during TandemHeart support. Left main and multivessel PCI was performed in 62% of patients, and rotablation was used in 48%. Procedural success rate was 97%, whereas 30-day and 6 month survival were 90% and 87%, respectively. Major vascular complications occurred in 13% of cases. None of our patients developed contrast induced nephropathy or needed dialysis.
CONCLUSIONS: High-risk PCI with percutaneous left ventricular support using TandemHeart is a viable therapeutic strategy for a select subset of patients at very high risk with standard percutaneous revascularization techniques.
Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22378485     DOI: 10.1002/ccd.23465

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1522-1946            Impact factor:   2.692


  9 in total

Review 1.  Mechanical Circulatory Support in High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Authors:  Bhuvnesh Aggarwal; Wahaj Aman; Omar Jeroudi; Neal S Kleiman
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2018 Jan-Mar

Review 2.  The Use of Mechanical Circulatory Assist Devices for ACS Patients with Cardiogenic Shock and High-Risk PCI.

Authors:  Nina Manian; Janki Thakker; Ajith Nair
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 3.955

Review 3.  Mechanical Circulatory Support for Acute Heart Failure Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.

Authors:  Min Suk Choi; Hunbo Shim; Yang Hyun Cho
Journal:  Int J Heart Fail       Date:  2020-01-22

4.  Case series of high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention with rotational atherectomy under short-term mechanical circulatory support with TandemHeart in the setting of acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Leonie Großekettler; Bastian Schmack; Hugo A Katus; Raffi Bekeredjian; Philip Raake
Journal:  Eur Heart J Case Rep       Date:  2020-09-16

5.  Combined use of TandemHeart percutaneous ventricular assist device and Stereotaxis magnetic navigation during cardiac ablation procedure.

Authors:  Andrew C Miller; Annicka C Evans; James Revenaugh; J Peter Weiss; Bruce B Reid; Abdallah G Kfoury
Journal:  HeartRhythm Case Rep       Date:  2015-09-30

Review 6.  Utilization of Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices in Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction and High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Interventions.

Authors:  Rabea Asleh; Jon R Resar
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 4.241

7.  Percutaneous mechanical circulatory support devices in high-risk patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: A meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Authors:  Wenhai Shi; Wuwan Wang; Kechun Wang; Wei Huang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 8.  Complications of Temporary Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support for Cardiogenic Shock: An Appraisal of Contemporary Literature.

Authors:  Anna V Subramaniam; Gregory W Barsness; Saarwaani Vallabhajosyula; Saraschandra Vallabhajosyula
Journal:  Cardiol Ther       Date:  2019-10-23

9.  Temporal Trends and Site Variation in High-Risk Coronary Intervention and the Use of Mechanical Circulatory Support: Insights From the Veterans Affairs Clinical Assessment Reporting and Tracking (CART) Program.

Authors:  Rory S Bricker; Thomas J Glorioso; Omar Jawaid; Mary E Plomondon; Javier A Valle; Ehrin J Armstrong; Stephen W Waldo
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2019-12-07       Impact factor: 5.501

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.