| Literature DB >> 22375797 |
Gracie Vargas1, Igor Patrikeev, Jingna Wei, Brent Bell, Kathleen Vincent, Nigel Bourne, Massoud Motamedi.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The development of safe topical microbicides that can preserve the integrity of cervicovaginal tract epithelial barrier is of great interest as this may minimize the potential for increased susceptibility to STI infections. High resolution imaging to assess epithelial integrity in a noninvasive manner could be a valuable tool for preclinical testing of candidate topical agents.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22375797 PMCID: PMC3315435 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2334-12-48
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Infect Dis ISSN: 1471-2334 Impact factor: 3.090
Figure 1Representative confocal microendoscopy and histology images. For each treatment group, a 3 × 3 layout of 9 confocal images representing positions 1,3,5,11,13,15,21,23,25 of the sampled 5 × 5 image matrix from a single animal is shown (left column), followed by a single larger confocal image (center column), and corresponding H&E section (right column). (a) 5 × 5 matrix representing the positions of the 25 imaged sites per animal. (b-d) representative PBS case; (e-g) representative HEC treated case, (h-j) representative 0.02% BZK treated case; (k-m) representative 0.2% BZK treated case; (n-p) representative N-9 treated case. Confocal images are shown in pseudocolor for ease of visualization with the intensity represented by the shown color (black represents a zero intensity value, progressing to yellow for maximum intensity). Scale bar 100 μm.
Figure 2Number of damaged regions based on mean-to-median ratio. Images with a mean-to-median ratio were enumerated per animal and averaged within treatment groups. No statistical significance occurred between PBS and HEC cases. Statistically significant increase in the number of damaged regions occurred with 0.02% BZK, 0.2% BZK, and N-9. Results in the 0.02% BZK case were similar to N-9, and both were statistically different from those at 0.2% BZK. Statistical analysis for comparison between treatment groups was by single factor ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test for significance. Statistical significance with p < 0.05 is represented with * and p <0.01 with **.
Figure 3Histology Scores and Epithelial thickness per treatment group. (a) Results from visual scoring histological analysis of injury based on an ordinal value scoring system (0,1,2). Statistical analysis of ordinal variable (0,1,2) histology scores was by the mixed model to test the treatment effects and perform multiple comparisons. Tukey adjustment was used for the p-values in the multiple comparisons. (b) Epithelial thickness measured quantitatively on H&E histology single sections. Single factor ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test was applied to test for statistical significance. Statistical significance with p < 0.05 is represented with * and p < 0.01 with **.