BACKGROUND: Confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE) is a rapidly emerging method for in vivo imaging of the GI tract. OBJECTIVE: To determine the preliminary evaluation accuracy and interobserver agreement of probe-based CLE (pCLE) in Barrett's esophagus (BE). DESIGN: Prospective, double-blind review of pCLE images of 40 sites of BE tissue by using matching biopsies as the reference standard. A training set of 20 images with known histology was first reviewed to standardize image interpretation, followed by blinded review of 20 unknown images. SETTING: Eleven experts in BE imaging from 4 different endoscopy centers from the United States and Europe evaluated the images. PATIENTS: This study involved nonconsecutive patients undergoing BE surveillance or evaluation of high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia or early adenocarcinoma. INTERVENTION: Intravenous fluorescein pCLE imaging of each site within the BE segment, followed by matching biopsy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Sensitivity, specificity, and agreement for the pCLE diagnosis of high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia or carcinoma. RESULTS: In the validation set (n = 20), 11 cases had high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia or invasive carcinoma. The sensitivity for the diagnosis of neoplasia for the 11 endoscopists was 88% (range 6 of 11 to 11 of 11), and the specificity was 96% (range 7 of 9 to 9 of 9). There was substantial agreement on the pCLE diagnosis (86%, kappa 0.72; 95% confidence interval, 0.58-0.86). Endomicroscopists with prior pCLE experience had an overall sensitivity of 91% (all 10 of 11), specificity of 100% (all 9 of 9), and almost perfect agreement (92%, kappa 0.83; 95% confidence interval, 0.64-1.0). LIMITATIONS: Small sample size and use of offline video sequences. CONCLUSION: Results suggest that pCLE for the diagnosis of neoplasia in BE has very high accuracy and reliability. Copyright 2010 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
BACKGROUND: Confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE) is a rapidly emerging method for in vivo imaging of the GI tract. OBJECTIVE: To determine the preliminary evaluation accuracy and interobserver agreement of probe-based CLE (pCLE) in Barrett's esophagus (BE). DESIGN: Prospective, double-blind review of pCLE images of 40 sites of BE tissue by using matching biopsies as the reference standard. A training set of 20 images with known histology was first reviewed to standardize image interpretation, followed by blinded review of 20 unknown images. SETTING: Eleven experts in BE imaging from 4 different endoscopy centers from the United States and Europe evaluated the images. PATIENTS: This study involved nonconsecutive patients undergoing BE surveillance or evaluation of high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia or early adenocarcinoma. INTERVENTION: Intravenous fluoresceinpCLE imaging of each site within the BE segment, followed by matching biopsy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Sensitivity, specificity, and agreement for the pCLE diagnosis of high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia or carcinoma. RESULTS: In the validation set (n = 20), 11 cases had high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia or invasive carcinoma. The sensitivity for the diagnosis of neoplasia for the 11 endoscopists was 88% (range 6 of 11 to 11 of 11), and the specificity was 96% (range 7 of 9 to 9 of 9). There was substantial agreement on the pCLE diagnosis (86%, kappa 0.72; 95% confidence interval, 0.58-0.86). Endomicroscopists with prior pCLE experience had an overall sensitivity of 91% (all 10 of 11), specificity of 100% (all 9 of 9), and almost perfect agreement (92%, kappa 0.83; 95% confidence interval, 0.64-1.0). LIMITATIONS: Small sample size and use of offline video sequences. CONCLUSION: Results suggest that pCLE for the diagnosis of neoplasia in BE has very high accuracy and reliability. Copyright 2010 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
Authors: Herbert C Wolfsen; Julia E Crook; Murli Krishna; Sami R Achem; Kenneth R Devault; Ernest P Bouras; David S Loeb; Mark E Stark; Timothy A Woodward; Lois L Hemminger; Frances K Cayer; Michael B Wallace Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2008-03-21 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: M B Wallace; R H Hawes; V Durkalski; A Chak; S Mallery; M F Catalano; M J Wiersema; M S Bhutani; D Ciaccia; M L Kochman; F G Gress; A Van Velse; B J Hoffman Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2001-03 Impact factor: 9.427
Authors: M A Kara; F P Peters; W D Rosmolen; K K Krishnadath; F J ten Kate; P Fockens; J J G H Bergman Journal: Endoscopy Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 10.093
Authors: R J Schlemper; R H Riddell; Y Kato; F Borchard; H S Cooper; S M Dawsey; M F Dixon; C M Fenoglio-Preiser; J F Fléjou; K Geboes; T Hattori; T Hirota; M Itabashi; M Iwafuchi; A Iwashita; Y I Kim; T Kirchner; M Klimpfinger; M Koike; G Y Lauwers; K J Lewin; G Oberhuber; F Offner; A B Price; C A Rubio; M Shimizu; T Shimoda; P Sipponen; E Solcia; M Stolte; H Watanabe; H Yamabe Journal: Gut Date: 2000-08 Impact factor: 23.059
Authors: Mohammed A Kara; Femke P Peters; Paul Fockens; Fiebo J W ten Kate; Jacques J G H M Bergman Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2006-08 Impact factor: 9.427
Authors: Mohammed A Kara; Mohamed Ennahachi; Paul Fockens; Fiebo J W ten Kate; Jacques J G H M Bergman Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2006-08 Impact factor: 9.427
Authors: Valentin Becker; Stefan von Delius; Monther Bajbouj; Artemisia Karagianni; Roland M Schmid; Alexander Meining Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2008-04-24 Impact factor: 9.427
Authors: K K Wang; J M Tian; E Gorospe; J Penfield; G Prasad; T Goddard; M Wongkeesong; N S Buttar; L Lutzke; S Krishnadath Journal: Dis Esophagus Date: 2012-03-12 Impact factor: 3.429
Authors: Katherine Wu; Jen-Jane Liu; Winifred Adams; Geoffrey A Sonn; Kathleen E Mach; Ying Pan; Andrew H Beck; Kristin C Jensen; Joseph C Liao Journal: Urology Date: 2011-05-23 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: Neel Sharma; Supriya Srivastava; Florian Kern; Wa Xian; Teh Ming; Frank McKeon; Khek Yu Ho Journal: United European Gastroenterol J Date: 2015-12-15 Impact factor: 4.623
Authors: E Haraldsson; L Lundell; F Swahn; L Enochsson; J M Löhr; U Arnelo Journal: United European Gastroenterol J Date: 2016-10-17 Impact factor: 4.623
Authors: Jordan A Sweer; Mason T Chen; Kevan J Salimian; Richard J Battafarano; Nicholas J Durr Journal: J Biophotonics Date: 2019-06-14 Impact factor: 3.207
Authors: P M Vila; M J Kingsley; A D Polydorides; M-A Protano; M C Pierce; J Sauk; M K Kim; K Patel; J H Godbold; J D Waye; R Richards-Kortum; S Anandasabapathy Journal: Dis Esophagus Date: 2013-02-26 Impact factor: 3.429
Authors: Timothy C Chang; Jen-Jane Liu; Shelly T Hsiao; Ying Pan; Kathleen E Mach; John T Leppert; Jesse K McKenney; Robert V Rouse; Joseph C Liao Journal: J Endourol Date: 2013-02-14 Impact factor: 2.942
Authors: Dongsuk Shin; Michelle H Lee; Alexandros D Polydorides; Mark C Pierce; Peter M Vila; Neil D Parikh; Daniel G Rosen; Sharmila Anandasabapathy; Rebecca R Richards-Kortum Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2015-08-05 Impact factor: 9.427