Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a major cause of cancer-related deaths in much of the world. Most CRCs arise from pre-malignant (dysplastic) lesions, such as adenomatous polyps, and current endoscopic screening approaches with white light do not detect all dysplastic lesions. Thus, new strategies to identify such lesions, including non-polypoid lesions, are needed. We aim to identify and validate novel peptides that specifically target dysplastic colonic epithelium in vivo. We used phage display to identify a novel peptide that binds to dysplastic colonic mucosa in vivo in a genetically engineered mouse model of colo-rectal tumorigenesis, based on somatic Apc (adenomatous polyposis coli) gene inactivation. Binding was confirmed using confocal microscopy on biopsied adenomas and excised adenomas incubated with peptide ex vivo. Studies of mice where a mutant Kras allele was somatically activated in the colon to generate hyperplastic epithelium were also performed for comparison. Several rounds of in vivo T7 library biopanning isolated a peptide, QPIHPNNM. The fluorescent-labeled peptide bound to dysplastic lesions on endoscopic analysis. Quantitative assessment revealed the fluorescent-labeled peptide (target/background: 2.17±0.61) binds ∼2-fold greater to the colonic adenomas when compared to the control peptide (target/background: 1.14±0.15), p<0.01. The peptide did not bind to the non-dysplastic (hyperplastic) epithelium of the Kras mice. This work is first to image fluorescence-labeled peptide binding in vivo that is specific towards colonic dysplasia on wide-area surveillance. This finding highlights an innovative strategy for targeted detection to localize pre-malignant lesions that can be generalized to the epithelium of hollow organs.
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a major cause of cancer-related deaths in much of the world. Most CRCs arise from pre-malignant (dysplastic) lesions, such as adenomatous polyps, and current endoscopic screening approaches with white light do not detect all dysplastic lesions. Thus, new strategies to identify such lesions, including non-polypoid lesions, are needed. We aim to identify and validate novel peptides that specifically target dysplastic colonic epithelium in vivo. We used phage display to identify a novel peptide that binds to dysplastic colonic mucosa in vivo in a genetically engineered mouse model of colo-rectal tumorigenesis, based on somatic Apc (adenomatous polyposis coli) gene inactivation. Binding was confirmed using confocal microscopy on biopsied adenomas and excised adenomas incubated with peptide ex vivo. Studies of mice where a mutant Kras allele was somatically activated in the colon to generate hyperplastic epithelium were also performed for comparison. Several rounds of in vivo T7 library biopanning isolated a peptide, QPIHPNNM. The fluorescent-labeled peptide bound to dysplastic lesions on endoscopic analysis. Quantitative assessment revealed the fluorescent-labeled peptide (target/background: 2.17±0.61) binds ∼2-fold greater to the colonic adenomas when compared to the control peptide (target/background: 1.14±0.15), p<0.01. The peptide did not bind to the non-dysplastic (hyperplastic) epithelium of the Krasmice. This work is first to image fluorescence-labeled peptide binding in vivo that is specific towards colonic dysplasia on wide-area surveillance. This finding highlights an innovative strategy for targeted detection to localize pre-malignant lesions that can be generalized to the epithelium of hollow organs.
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer death in the U.S. The
average lifetime risk of CRC is 1 in 20 within the industrialized world, with the
highest rate of incidence being within the U.S. (approximately 142,000 new cases
diagnosed in 2010) [1], [2]. Adenomatous polyps, or adenomas, appear to be major
precursors to CRC, though only a fraction of adenomas progress to CRC. The current
screening method for CRC and adenomas uses standard white light endoscopy to detect
morphological changes and lesions in the mucosa. Average polyp miss rates have been
reported as high as 22%, with flat and depressed lesions being the most
difficult to identify with conventional white light colonoscopy [3]–[7]. Furthermore,
the presence of flat dysplastic lesions in the setting of chronic ulcerative colitis
presents a significantly increased risk for the development of frank carcinoma [8]. These statistics
support the fact that the morbidity rate from CRC could be significantly reduced
with new targeted methods of early cancer detection based on protein expression
rather than on anatomical changes.Pre-clinical mouse models of disease provide an important tool for studying
mechanisms of disease development. It has been established that mutations in the
adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) gene are
likely to be critical events in the initiation of the majority of adenomas and CRC
[9]–[11]. Previously reported genetically engineered mouse models
that mimic humanAPC gene mutations mainly develop adenomas in the
small intestine (e.g. Apc model), rather than the
distal colon, making it difficult to image the progression of polyps in
vivo using small animal endoscopy. In the mouse model used in this
study (CPC;Apc model [12]), one Apc
allele is somatically inactivated in the epithelium from the distal ileum to the
rectum. As described previously, the mice develop between 4 to 10 adenomas in the
distal colon and rectum. Of note, the adenomas present within these mice not only
develop from somatic modification of a gene that underlies adenoma and carcinoma
development, but a subset also progresses to carcinoma, akin to the situation in
man.While adenomas have been shown as precursors of CRC, hyperplastic polyps have not.
The progression of an adenoma to CRC can be attributed to accumulated genetic
defects that regulate homeostatic cell behavior. Mutant KRAS
alleles have been shown to promote tumorigenic growth in CRC cells, but do not in
cases of hyperplasia where the malignant potential is negligible [13]. In this
study, we also used another mouse model having an activated
Kras mutant allele that demonstrates
hyperplastic polyp-like features, to investigate fluorescent-labeled peptide binding
to a hyperplastic model that does not progress to carcinoma.Peptides that bind to pre-cancerous colorectal lesions have the potential to guide
tissue biopsy [14], and such peptides can be isolated using combinatorial phage
display screening [14], [15]. Although much effort has concentrated on small-molecule
and antibody ligands, peptides have advantages for in vivo use in
the gastrointestinal tract, because they can be delivered topically to identify
early molecular changes in the epithelium, where adenomas and carcinomas originate.
In addition, peptides have minimal immunogenicity and can exhibit rapid binding
kinetics and diffuse into diseased mucosa. Phage display is a powerful combinatorial
technique for peptide discovery that uses methods of recombinant DNA technology to
generate a complex library of peptides, often expressing up to
107–109 unique sequences, that can bind to cell
surface targets [16], [17]. The DNA of candidate phages can be recovered and
sequenced, elucidating positive binding peptides that can then be synthetically
fabricated in large quantities at relatively low cost. The T7 system has proven
effective for in vivo panning experiments identifying peptides
specific to pancreatic islet vasculature [18], breast vasculature [19], bladder tumor
cells [20], and
hepatocytes [21].
Panning with intact tissue presents additional relevant cell targets while
accounting for subtle features of the tissue microenvironment that may affect
binding [15],
[22]–[24].Our aims here are to select peptides that preferentially bind to adenomas in the
CPC;Apcmouse model using in vivo phage
display and to demonstrate this binding in vivo using a
fluorescence-label on small animal endoscopy. After peptide selection, we aim to
show that the fluorescence-labeled peptide binds preferentially to dysplastic
epithelium in the CPC;Apcmice and not to non-dysplastic epithelium
from control mice or to hyperplastic colonic epithelium seen following somatic
activation of a mutant Kras allele in colonic epithelium.
Results
In vivo phage display panning isolated QPIHPNNM as a binder to colonic
dysplasia
After the first two rounds of in vivo panning, the number of
phages bound to the colonic adenomas was approximately the same as that for the
adjacent normal colon tissue (Fig.
1). However, after clearing against normal colon and other organs,
the third round showed a 9-fold increase in the number of bound phages to the
adenomas over adjacent normal colon tissue. This trend, though not as
pronounced, continued after the fourth round of panning. Fifty phages were
selected from rounds three and four of panning, and the DNA was sequenced. Three
entire sequences were repeated twice (NGTTSSNNQLINENNIQN, EHMYNTPHTYHTTMKNNK, QPIHPNNM) and four partial sequences were repeated twice
(NKLAAALE, KNYKN, TNTHN, KHTNN). The QPIHPNNM peptide was only found in round
3, whereas the two full sequences and the four partial sequences were found in
both rounds 3 and 4. An advantage of the T7 phage library system is that it does
not have phage sequence amplification bias as compared to other phage libraries
[25], thus
any repeated phages were considered promising candidates. One of the three
repeated phages was less than 18 amino acids because of the presence of a stop
codon within the sequence. Using the RELIC software, the INFO value for the
three candidate phages were calculated against a pool of phages from the initial
T7 library [26]. The INFO scores for the NGTTSSNNQLINENNIQN, EHMYNTPHTYHTTMKNNK, and QPIHPNNM were 41.6, 45.2, and 49.1,
respectively. A higher INFO score suggests a greater probability that the phage
clone identified was not by chance. From this data, the QPIHPNNM peptide was the most unique
sequence of the three longer sequences recovered and was synthesized for further
testing.
Figure 1
Titer results showing plaque forming units (pfu) for adenomas
normalized to the number of phages bound to normal colonic
mucosa.
After two rounds of panning, the recovered phage pool was first cleared
against a homogenized mixture of organs (heart, kidney, liver, normal
colon) and subsequently cleared against normal colon tissue only.
Clearing decreased the number of phage that bound to normal colon tissue
9× or 3× in rounds 3 and 4, respectively. The titer was
performed in triplicate.
Titer results showing plaque forming units (pfu) for adenomas
normalized to the number of phages bound to normal colonic
mucosa.
After two rounds of panning, the recovered phage pool was first cleared
against a homogenized mixture of organs (heart, kidney, liver, normal
colon) and subsequently cleared against normal colon tissue only.
Clearing decreased the number of phage that bound to normal colon tissue
9× or 3× in rounds 3 and 4, respectively. The titer was
performed in triplicate.
Endoscopy and confocal microscopy revealed target peptide binding in
vivo
The in vivo endoscopy images revealed that the target peptide
(FITC-Ahx-QPIHPNNM) bound
to the colonic adenomas and provided greater fluorescence signal when compared
to the control peptide (FITC-Ahx-GGGAGGGA), Fig. 2 (Panels A–C). Furthermore, FITC-Ahx-QPIHPNNM showed minimal background
binding to adjacent non-adenomatous colon tissue during endoscopy. Also, the
FITC-Ahx-QPIHPNNM peptide
did not bind to colonic mucosa from control mice lacking the Cre recombinase
transgene (Fig. 2D) or to
hyperplastic colonic epithelial tissue found in mice with conditional activation
of a mutant Kras allele in colonic epithelium (Fig. 2E). Representative
histology for A) normal (scale bar 100 µm), B) hyperplastic (scale bar 50
µm), and C,D) dysplastic (scale bar 200 and 50 µm, respectively)
colonic mucosa are shown in Fig.
3.
Figure 2
Images from wide-field endoscopy videos after application of
fluorescence-labeled peptides.
The left and right columns represent frames from white light and
fluorescence, respectively. The fluorescent labeled target peptide
FITC-Ahx-QPIHPNNM
showed positive binding to (A) multiple adenomas and (B) single adenoma
in a CPC;Apc mouse. (C) The control peptide
FITC-Ahx-GGGAGGGA
showed minimal binding. The target peptide also showed minimal binding
to (D) the lumen of a CPC;Apc bred mouse negative for
Cre recombinase (control litter mate) and (E) the hyperplastic
epithelium in a mutant Kras mouse model. White arrows
identify adenomas.
Figure 3
Representative histology from (A) normal colonic mucosa, (B)
hyperplastic Kras, and (C–D) adenoma in
CPC;Apc mice.
C: An advanced dysplastic adenoma >1 mm in size. D: Higher
magnification (scale bar 50 µm) of dysplasia (boxed region of C)
displaying enlarged nuclei, hyperchromaticity and distorted crypts.
Images from wide-field endoscopy videos after application of
fluorescence-labeled peptides.
The left and right columns represent frames from white light and
fluorescence, respectively. The fluorescent labeled target peptideFITC-Ahx-QPIHPNNM
showed positive binding to (A) multiple adenomas and (B) single adenoma
in a CPC;Apcmouse. (C) The control peptideFITC-Ahx-GGGAGGGA
showed minimal binding. The target peptide also showed minimal binding
to (D) the lumen of a CPC;Apc bred mouse negative for
Cre recombinase (control litter mate) and (E) the hyperplastic
epithelium in a mutant Krasmouse model. White arrows
identify adenomas.
Representative histology from (A) normal colonic mucosa, (B)
hyperplastic Kras, and (C–D) adenoma in
CPC;Apc mice.
C: An advanced dysplastic adenoma >1 mm in size. D: Higher
magnification (scale bar 50 µm) of dysplasia (boxed region of C)
displaying enlarged nuclei, hyperchromaticity and distorted crypts.Adenomas that developed at approximately 4 cm proximal from the anal verge of the
mouse were minimally raised above the mucosal surface, but their morphology, as
observed via endoscopy, was not as polypoid as more distal adenomas. Neither the
target or control peptide bound to the more proximal and minimally raised
lesions. The target peptide may not have bound, because the biopanning
experiments were initially performed using visible, polypoid adenomas (i.e.,
CPC;Apcmice of 8 to 9 months of age). Data points for both
the target and control peptide on these minimally raised lesions at 4 cm were
not used in data analysis, as there were few adenomas of this kind for each
peptide tested that were detected.Quantitative analysis of peptide adsorption to distal colonic adenomas revealed
that the target peptideFITC-Ahx-QPIHPNNM (T/B: 2.17±0.61) binds ∼2-fold greater
to the colonic adenomas when compared to the control peptideFITC-Ahx-GGGAGGGA (T/B:
1.14±0.15) (Fig. 4).
Non-parametric Mann-Whitney statistical analysis indicated that
FITC-Ahx-QPIHPNNM binds
in significantly greater amounts to the adenomas than FITC-Ahx-GGGAGGGA, p<0.01. T/B calculations
for the FITC-Ahx-QPIHPNNM
binding to the control or hyperplastic mice was not possible.
Figure 4
Quantitative analysis of peptide adsorption to distal colonic
adenomas showing target peptide FITC-Ahx-QPIHPNNM (2.17±0.61,
n = 18) binds greater to the adenomas when compared
to the control peptide FITC-Ahx-GGGAGGGA (1.14±0.15,
n = 7).
The mean of each group is represented by a horizontal black line with one
standard deviation from the mean displayed. Non-parametric Mann-Whitney
independent samples analysis demonstrates target peptide binds more
significantly than control, p<0.01.
Quantitative analysis of peptide adsorption to distal colonic
adenomas showing target peptide FITC-Ahx-QPIHPNNM (2.17±0.61,
n = 18) binds greater to the adenomas when compared
to the control peptide FITC-Ahx-GGGAGGGA (1.14±0.15,
n = 7).
The mean of each group is represented by a horizontal black line with one
standard deviation from the mean displayed. Non-parametric Mann-Whitney
independent samples analysis demonstrates target peptide binds more
significantly than control, p<0.01.Confocal microscopy images of biopsied adenomas collected subsequent to peptide
administration showed evidence that the target peptide (Fig. 5A) bound more to adenomas than the
control peptide (Fig.
5B).
Figure 5
Confocal microscopy images showing binding of fluorescence-labeled
peptide to colon adenomas.
Biopsies were taken after in vivo administration via the
endoscope of the FITC-Ahx-QPIHPNNM target peptide (A) or the
FITC-Ahx-GGGAGGGA
control peptide (B) and subsequently imaged. Scale bar, 25 µm.
Confocal microscopy images showing binding of fluorescence-labeled
peptide to colon adenomas.
Biopsies were taken after in vivo administration via the
endoscope of the FITC-Ahx-QPIHPNNM target peptide (A) or the
FITC-Ahx-GGGAGGGA
control peptide (B) and subsequently imaged. Scale bar, 25 µm.
QPIHPNNM displayed
enhanced binding to whole adenomas ex vivo
Two adenomas visualized endoscopically ex vivo under
conventional white light illumination are shown in Fig. 6A. Gross analysis of peptide binding on
fluorescence revealed that the FITC-Ahx-QPIHPNNM peptide bound to the excised adenomas more
robustly than the FITC-Ahx-GGGAGGGA control peptide (Fig. 6B). Comparison between
FITC-Ahx-QPIHPNNM and
FITC-Ahx-GGGAGGGA binding
showed the target peptide bound 2.51±0.59 times greater than the control
peptide for the whole adenoma pairs analyzed.
Figure 6
Wide-field and confocal images of excised adenomas incubated with
peptide ex vivo.
(A) Two polyps visualized endoscopically ex vivo under
conventional white light illumination. (B) Ex vivo
study shows preferential binding of the fluorescent-labeled target
peptide FITC-Ahx-QPIHPNNM compared to the control peptide
FITC-Ahx-GGGAGGGA
on excised colon. Corresponding representative confocal microscopy
images showing increased binding to the adenoma incubated with (C)
target peptide when compared to (D) the control. A target to control
peptide binding ratio was calculated as 2.51±0.59 (s.d.) for the
excised adenoma pairs. Scale bar, 25 µm.
Wide-field and confocal images of excised adenomas incubated with
peptide ex vivo.
(A) Two polyps visualized endoscopically ex vivo under
conventional white light illumination. (B) Ex vivo
study shows preferential binding of the fluorescent-labeled target
peptideFITC-Ahx-QPIHPNNM compared to the control peptideFITC-Ahx-GGGAGGGA
on excised colon. Corresponding representative confocal microscopy
images showing increased binding to the adenoma incubated with (C)
target peptide when compared to (D) the control. A target to control
peptide binding ratio was calculated as 2.51±0.59 (s.d.) for the
excised adenoma pairs. Scale bar, 25 µm.From the ex vivo peptide binding experiment, confocal
microscopic imaging revealed that the FITC-Ahx-QPIHPNNM candidate peptide showed
increased binding to the dysplastic crypts when compared to the
FITC-Ahx-GGGAGGGA control
peptide (Fig. 6C and 6D).
Minimal to no binding was found for the FITC-Ahx-GGGAGGGA control peptide. These results
further validate preferential binding of the target peptide to the adenomas.
Histology of dysplasia and hyperplasia validated
The normal colonic epithelium from the CPC;Apcmice showed well
organized crypt morphology (Fig.
3A). The epithelium of the hyperplastic Krasmice
showed hyperplastic characteristics including a serrated morphology (Fig. 3B). The adenomas from
the CPC;Apcmice used in phage panning, in
vivo peptide administration, ex vivo peptide
administration, and biopsies all showed dysplasia, characterized by enlarged
nuclei, hyperchromaticity, and distorted crypts and was validated on histology
(Fig. 3C and 3D).
Discussion
Here, we demonstrate targeted detection of colonic dysplasia in vivo
using a novel fluorescence-labeled peptide selected with phage display
methodologies. These findings highlight an innovative strategy for localizing
pre-malignant lesions within the epithelium based on suspected alterations in
protein expression rather than on gross architectural abnormalities, and the results
suggest that the approach may have potential to enhance the diagnostic specificity
of endoscopy in the clinical setting. This work also supports the use of genetically
engineered mousetumor models for longitudinal in vivo imaging,
allowing for repetitive studies and for each animal to be used as its own control.
Validation of the targeted approach with fluorescence endoscopy was achieved using a
mouse model that spontaneously develops adenomas in the distal colon. Previously
developed Apcmouse models demonstrate polyp growth
predominately in the small intestine, an anatomical location that cannot be easily
reached with endoscopy. Others have generated mouse models that develop tumors in
the distal colon using implanted cancer cells [27] or adenovirus activated
mutations [28].
However, these models required surgical intervention to generate polyps, and the
ensuing response to injury may have some contributing role in target alteration.
Tissue targeting peptides have the advantage of being topically applied where the
probe can be delivered in high concentrations to saturate over-expressed dysplastic
targets. Our results demonstrate that preferential binding of molecular peptide
probes towards dysplastic colonic adenomas can be identified via in
vivo phage panning.Phage display panning uses an unbiased approach to select short peptides that bind to
over-expressed cell surface targets. Research suggests that the T7 phage system
possesses decreased sequence bias compared to the M13 phage systems [25]. In the past,
we have successfully utilized phage display to identify peptide binders to high
grade dysplasia in humanBarrett's esophagus [29] and colonic dysplasia [14] using the
commercially available M13 phage system. Because the current experiment involved
in vivo panning, rather than panning on excised tissue or an
established cell line, we chose the T7 system to aid in the reduction of
non-specific binding. The T7 system provides greater diversity than the M13 system,
is extremely stable, amplifies in a few hours instead of overnight, and can display
larger peptides on its protein coat, whereas M13 amplification methods can allow
phages with better growth abilities to take over the amplification culture which can
decrease diversity with successive rounds of panning, complicating data analysis
[30]. Knowing
these benefits, the T7 system was built and utilized in our panning procedure.Our results identified many phage binders to the adenomas; however, the objective of
our study was to identify and validate a peptide that could target the spontaneous
adenomas in our mouse model in vivo. The identified peptide could
then be used to localize the pre-malignant lesions on imaging. While a drop in
peptide specificity was not expected between rounds 3 and 4 (Fig. 1), this drop could have resulted from the
necessity of using separate mice in each of these rounds. While adenomas arising in
the CPC;Apcmice used here, have the same genetic lesions
initiating tumor development (i.e., bi-allelic Apc defects in the
adenomatous cells), the biological factors contributing to the progressive growth of
each polyp likely varies within mice as it does in humans. The target peptide,
FITC-Ahx-QPIHPNNM, identified
during in vivo biopanning was found to bind to colonic adenomas
approximately 2-fold greater than a control peptide. This binding was validated in a
cohort of six mice, all demonstrating binding in vivo, displaying a
total of eighteen adenomas. In addition, ex vivo validation studies
that exhibited a similar 2-fold increase in binding of the target peptide compared
to the control peptide. The candidate peptide did not bind to the colon epithelium
in the hyperplastic Krasmice, illustrating that the peptide is
specific to dysplastic colonic mucosa. Adenomatous polyps are thought to be
precursors to CRC whereas hyperplastic polyps are not [31], [32], suggesting that the target
peptide could be binding to a cell surface target unique to dysplastic and/or
cancerous cells. Confocal microscopy verified that the target peptide was indeed
binding to the adenoma in comparison with the control peptide in both the biopsy and
ex vivo experiments. Our initial studies used 5′-FITC as
a fluorescent probe, for compatibility with our existing endoscopy instrument;
however, the QPIHPNNM peptide can
be easily labeled with other dyes in the visible and near infrared (NIR) spectrum,
where improved image contrast is expected from reduced tissue autofluorescence.
Preliminary experiments testing for QPIHPNNM binding to human surgical specimens of colon adenomas
have been performed and are reported in Text S1 and Fig. S1.Peptides with specific binding properties can be isolated using phage display
libraries. To our knowledge, colorectal targeting peptides have been found using
in vitro phage panning on colon carcinoma cells (CPIEDRPMC on HT29 cells [33], HEWSYLAPYPWF on WiDr cells [34], and
VHLGYAT on SW480 cells [35]) and ex
vivo panning on human colonic tissue (SPTKSNS
[36] and
VRPMPLQ
[14]); however, no
colorectal targeting peptides have been identified using methods of in
vivo phage panning. In vitro phage panning on
established cell lines remove the targeted cells from their native environment,
possibly altering cell behavior. Ex vivo panning procedures on
excised human tissue have limitations in that they must consider the homogeneity of
tissue, the time elapsed after being removed from the patient, and the assumption
that all patients over-express the same molecular target. In vivo
phage panning in a GEM model with genetically identical mice can offer the advantage
of isolating peptides that directly accumulate into tumor tissue, binding to either
endothelial cells within tumor vasculature [37], epithelial cells through
extravasation [38], or extracellular matrix. Work published using the fuse5
phage system show phages accumulate into normal CF-1 mouse intestine within 1 hour
post injection [39].
Taking into account that phages are capable of extravasation within an hour and that
tumor vasculature is more porous than normal tissue, a stringent time point of 10
minutes was used for in vivo circulation within the
CPC;Apcmouse model to isolate phages that first bind to the
target tissue. Our current work supports that phage can extravasate to extracellular
matrix and epithelial cells, determining upfront the peptides that would be
efficacious systemic tumor-targeting agents.The previously reported peptide VRPMPLQ is a 7-mer peptide that was isolated using human colon
tissue with the intent of direct translation of the peptide to the clinic [14], while the
currently reported QPIHPNNM
peptide is an 8-mer peptide isolated using the spontaneous mouse model
(CPC;Apc) in an attempt to further understand the mechanism of
CRC. This GEM model allows longitudinal studies to be performed, decreasing the
number of mice and cost associated with such experiments. Despite the inability of
the QPIHPNNM peptide to detect
the minimally raised lesions 4 cm proximal from the anal verge as described in the
results, the QPIHPNNM may be
utilized to detect dysplastic tissue from hyperplastic tissue in
vivo. Furthermore, the newly discovered peptide, QPIHPNNM, now provides the opportunity to
improve our optical probes and instruments to optimize wide-field in
vivo lesion detection that can eventually be translated to the clinic.
We have demonstrated the first wide-field fluorescence binding of a peptide
in vivo, showing the advancement and feasibility of targeted
detection of diseased tissue based on tissue biology rather than anatomical changes
in vivo. The technique of in vivo phage
display can also be used to develop additional peptides to test novel methods of
multiple delivery or simultaneous detection of peptides using this mouse model.The confocal microscopy results show that the target peptide specifically binds to
dysplastic cells compared to the control peptide; however, the pattern of target
peptide binding suggests either cell surface or extracellular matrix binding. The
QPIHPNNM molecular target is
not known, and the sequence does not show full homology to any known receptor
ligands. The QPIHPNNM peptide
does have partial homology to the Ep300 protein (QP**PNNM) and an undefined cell adhesion
molecule-related/down-regulated by oncogenes precursor (transmembrane protein,
QPIHP), with the latter
suspected to be involved in the development of colorectal tumors [40], [41].Various attempts to design control peptides for target peptide validation reported
include amino acid replacement [42], [43], incorporation of an unrelated peptide sequenced during
panning [44], and
peptide scrambling. During the four rounds of T7 phage library panning in the
reported experiment, unrelated peptides having the same length (8-mer) as the target
peptide identified were not found. Peptide scrambling or amino acid replacement are
most commonly implemented if the binding properties of individual amino acids is
known. Since no structural and binding site information for the target
QPIHPNNM peptide is known,
efforts for designing a scrambled peptide or peptide with altered amino acids were
not attempted. In short peptides (<10 mer), it has been reported that only few
amino acids (2–3) have a significant role in binding, and these kinds of short
peptides can show some binding even after being scrambled [45]. The nature of the peptide (i.e.,
net charge, hydrophobicity, hydrophilicity) can also determine the fate of the
binding. Removing functional groups and neutralizing charge on a control peptide
have been previously used to demonstrate specific binding of the target peptide
[46], [47]. Taking this
information into account, we designed our control peptide (GGGAGGGA) to contain the same 5′-FITC
fluorophore, Ahx linker, and number of amino acids compared to the target
peptide.To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to use a mouse model that
mimics the progression of humancolon cancer to demonstrate the use of
fluorescence-labeled peptides to identify and localize dysplasia in wide-field
endoscopy. This approach can be generalized to other mouse models for studying
cancer development in organs accessible though microendoscopic instruments and
ultimately to clinical detection and localization in human disease.
Materials and Methods
T7 Library construction
The T7 library was constructed with the T7Select 10-3b vector as reported in the
T7Select System Manual (Novagen, Gibbstown, NJ). Briefly, random oligonucleotide
insert DNA for the X18 library was synthesized as follows:
5′-AAC TGC AAG CTT
TTA-(MNN)18-ACC ACC ACC AGA ATT CGG ATC CCC GAG CAT-3′ (where N
represents an equi-molar ratio of each nucleotide and M is an equi-molar ratio
of adenine and cytosine). The amino acid translation of the complementary
nucleotide sequence is: MLGDPNSGGGX
18. The insert DNA was incubated with
a complementary extension primer (5′-ATG CTC GGG GAT CCG AAT TCTGGT-3′), Klenow
enzyme (New England Biolabs, Beverly, MA), and deoxyribonucleotide triphosphates
(Novagen) to form the complementary DNA strand. This was digested with
EcoR1 and HindIII restriction
endonucleases (New England Biolabs). Following phenol/chloroform extraction and
ethanol precipitation, the purified fragments were ligated into predigested
T7Select 10-3b vector by T4 DNA ligase (Novagen). The ligation reaction was
incubated at 16°C, subjected to in vitro packaging, and
titered to determine the number of plaque forming units (pfu). The remaining
solution was amplified in isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside
(IPTG)-induced BLT5615 until lysis. The lysate was titered and stored at
−80°C in glycerol.
Mouse models
Mice were cared for under the approval of the University Committee on the Use and
Care of Animals, University of Michigan (UCUCA, Approved protocol 09881). The genetically engineered
mouse model (CPC;Apc) that produce adenomatous polyps are mice
containing Cre recombinase under the control of the Cdx2 promoter
(CDX2P-9.5NLS-Cre) and a floxed allele of the
APC gene [12]. This somatic mutation in an Apc
allele, which leads to a truncated Apc protein, causes the
development of adenomas in the distal colon as early as 10 weeks. Mice
exhibiting hyperplastic colon epithelium (hyperplastic Kras)
were generated by breeding mice with mutant Kras allele whose
transcription is prevented by a stop element flanked by LoxP recombination sites
(Kras) [48], [49] with transgenic mice
expressing Cre in the epithelial cells of a significant fraction of crypts of
the terminal ileum, cecum and colon (CDX2P9.5-G22Cre) [50]. All mice
were housed in specific pathogen-free conditions and supplied water ad
libitum throughout the study.
In vivo phage panning procedure
A 9 month old CPC;Apcmouse was injected via tail vein with
1×1011 pfu of the parent T7-18mer library. The library was
allowed to circulate for 10 min, after which the mouse was euthanized and organs
were harvested and kept on ice. The bound phages were recovered by homogenizing
each tissue or organ (colon adenomas, normal colonic mucosa) (Bio-gen Pro 200)
in DMEM-PI (Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium plus protease inhibitors: 1 mM
phenylmethanesulfonylfluoride (PMSF), 20 µg/mL aprotinin, and 1
µg/mL leupeptin) [36], [37]. The tissue samples were washed 3× with
ice-cold washing medium (DMEM-PI containing 1% bovine serum albumin),
centrifuging for 5 min at 3000 rpm between each wash. After the last wash,
freshly starved bacteria were added to each tissue homogenate and incubated for
30 min at room temperature (RT). Pre-warmed Luria-Bertani (LB) medium with
carbenicillin (50 µg/mL) was then added to the bacteria-homogenate
solution and incubated another 30 min at RT. The supernatant was recovered after
centrifugation and titered to determine the number of bound phage within each
tissue tested. This procedure constituted one round of panning. After two rounds
of panning, the recovered phages that bound to the colon adenomas were cleared
twice: once against a homogenized tissue cocktail consisting of colon, kidney,
liver and heart and a second time against normal murine colon. A total of four
rounds of phage panning were performed, with amplification of the recovered
eluate after each panning round. The input phage number (1×1011
pfu) was kept constant for each round of panning. All T7 DNA was sequenced per
Novagen's suggested protocol using a DNA sequencer (Applied Biosystems,
3730XL DNA Analyzer, UM DNA Core). The number of phages bound to each organ or
tissue was calculated as the output pfu/(input pfu×tissue mass).
Peptide synthesis
The peptides were synthesized using standard Fmoc-chemistry by solid phase
synthesis [51]. To ensure the phage and synthetic peptide were expressed
with the same orientation, the candidate peptide was synthesized with
5′-fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) attached to the amino terminus of the
peptide via amino hexanoic acid linker (Ahx). Deprotection and cleavage of the
peptides were achieved by treatment with a cleavage cocktail of trifluoroacetic
acid (TFA)/Tri-isopropylsilane/water (9.5/0.25/0.25, v/v/v) at RT for 3–4
hours. After cleavage of the product from the resin, the peptides were purified
by preparative-HPLC using a water (0.1% TFA)-acetonitrile
(0.1%TFA) gradient (2–33% acetonitrile over 31 min) (Waters
Breeze HPLC, Milford, MA). The peptides were characterized by an ESI mass
spectrometer (Micromass LCT Time-of-Flight mass spectrometer with Electrospray,
target peptide (FITC-Ahx-QPIHPNNM) mass (Calc. 1451.89, Obs. 1451.7
[M+H]+)). The purity (>95%) of the
compound was confirmed by analytical HPLC on a C18 column. As the
side chains of amino acids can have significant roles in binding with their
targets, a control peptide containing Gly and Ala (GGGAGGGA), which does not have any
functional groups on the amino acid side chains, was synthesized using same
methods (control peptide (FITC-Ahx-GGGAGGGA) mass (Calc. 1004.08 Obs. 1004.4
[M+H]+)). All peptides were reconstituted in
1× phosphate buffered saline (PBS) at 500 µM and further diluted in
1× PBS as necessary.
Small animal endoscopy and peptide administration
Prior to peptide administration, the colon was prepped using a tap water lavage.
Using a small animal endoscope (Karl Storz Veterinary Endoscopy, Goleta, CA)
with a 3Fr instrument channel for performing biopsy, adenomas suitable for
peptide administration were located, and the colon was rinsed with water until
all mucous was removed [52]. An adenoma was determined not suitable for peptide
administration if the adenoma was large enough (approximately >4 mm) to make
navigation with the animal endoscope difficult, as peptide delivery and washing
would be inconsistent. Adenomas from approximately 0.5–4 mm that were not
covered in debris, including stool and mucous, were included in the study.The fluorescence-labeled peptide was delivered at a concentration of 100 µM
in 1× PBS through an instrument channel. During peptide administration,
approximately 1 mL of peptide was delivered to the lower 4 cm of colon in each
mouse tested. The peptide was allowed to incubate for 5 min after which the
colon was cleansed 3× with a tap water to remove the unbound peptide.
Prior to imaging, the colon was inspected for residual peptide solution, and
when clean, the colon was insufflated with air and imaged. Fluorescence
excitation in the spectral regime from 450 to 475 nm was produced with a
bandpass filter that can be manually switched to the optical path of a 175 W
Nova Xenon light source and was delivered to the endoscope via a 3 mm diameter
fluid light cable (250 cm length). Fluorescence images were collected using a
510 nm long-pass filter to block the excitation light and was detected with a
3-chip color camera with an integrated parfocal zoom lens. Real time video was
recorded via firewire connected to a pc. Adenomas in CPC;Apcmice developing distal colonic adenomas (QPIHPNNM n = 6 mice having
n = 18 adenomas; GGGAGGGA n = 4 mice having
n = 7 adenomas) in addition to Cre recombinase negative
littermate controls (QPIHPNNM
n = 2 mice) and hyperplastic Krasmice
(QPIHPNNM
n = 3 mice) were imaged with both white light and
fluorescence endoscopy. The CPC;Apcmice imaged using
fluorescence endoscopy ranged in age from 3 to 5 months.
Fluorescent image analysis
Videos collected during endoscopy were exported as .avi video files and converted
into sequential .png images using Apple QuickTime. Consecutive white light and
fluorescence images for each adenoma analyzed were imported into NIH Image J.
The white light image was utilized to draw a region of interest (ROI) around the
adenoma or adjacent normal appearing colonic mucosa which was then superimposed
onto the fluorescent image (Fig. S2). Mean values were calculated for
each ROI, and an adenoma/normal colon, or a target to background ratio (T/B),
value was then calculated for each adenoma. Target to background ratios were not
calculated for Cre recombinase negative littermate control mice or hyperplastic
Krasmice, because these mice were devoid of adenomas.
Ex vivo Peptide Binding
Adenomas from CPC;Apcmice (n = 3 mice, 5
adenoma pairs) were excised and washed 3× in PBS. The adenomas were
incubated in 100 µM peptide solution for 5 min and subsequently washed
3× with 1× PBS. Adenomas were grossly imaged using the small animal
endoscope to view binding to the adenoma as a whole. Pairs of adenomas (one
candidate, one control) were imaged at a time to allow for the calculation of a
target peptide to control peptide binding ratio for each pair analyzed. An
average binding ratio was calculated ± one standard deviation. A similar
procedure to determine mean values for image analysis was followed for the
ex vivo adenomas as described above for the in
vivo adenomas.
Confocal Fluorescence Imaging
Preferential binding of the target peptide compared to the control peptide on
adenomatous polyps was confirmed with confocal microscopy after both in
vivo and ex vivo testing. From the in
vivo experiment, a biopsy was taken after 5′-FITC-labeled
peptide administration in vivo, incubated in 1 µg/mL
Hoechst dye for 5 min to stain living nuclei, rinsed 3× with 1× PBS
and imaged on a Leica TCS SP5 Microscope (Leica Microsystems, Bannockburn, IL).
From the ex vivo experiment, excised adenomas incubated with
peptide ex vivo were subsequently incubated in 1 µg/mL
Hoechst dye for 5 min to stain living nuclei, rinsed 3× with 1× PBS
and imaged on an Olympus FluoView 500 laser scanning confocal microscope
(Olympus Corp, Tokyo, Japan).
Statistics
All results are shown as mean ± one standard deviation. A non-parametric
Mann-Whitney Independent Samples test was performed to determine statistical
significance which was defined as p<0.05 between target and control peptide
binding to colonic adenomas (PASW Statistics 18, Chicago, IL).
Histology
All tissue was fixed in phosphate-buffered formalin for 24 hours,
paraffin-embedded and sectioned into 10 µm thin slices and stained with
hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). Histological images were captured using an
Axioskop2 upright microscope (Carl Zeiss Microimaging, Inc. Thornwood, NY).Preliminary fluorescent peptide binding to human surgical specimens of
non-neoplastic or neoplastic human colon tissue showing The GGGAGGGA control peptide displayed
minimal binding to normal colon tissue from the same patient. Scale bar 20
µm.(TIF)Click here for additional data file.The region of interest (ROI) for each polyp was selected using a series
of image frames exported upon conversion from .avi video file to serial
.png images using Apple QuickTime Player. The Storz small animal
endoscope has an excitation filter wheel that can be rotated from the
fluorescence excitation filter of 450–475 nm to no excitation filter
which produces an image similar to the wide-field white light view when the
filters are removed from the endoscope. The image produced when no
excitation filter is selected (referred to as “filtered white
light”) is still subject to the emission filter of 510–700 nm
that is positioned in front of the camera, and is, therefore, dimmer than
the white light images shown in Fig. 2. Using the filtered white light image (Fig.
S2A), a region of interest around the entire adenoma (yellow
polygon) was drawn using the polygon selection tool in the NIH ImageJ
software. This ROI was then superimposed onto the fluorescence image (Fig.
S2B) taken within ten frames of video. The example shown in Fig. S2
uses images (A) filtered white light and (B) fluorescence as the exported
.png frames. The ROI for the adjacent suspected normal colon tissue (white
polygon) was chosen using the same method.(TIF)Click here for additional data file.Preliminary experiments testing for(DOCX)Click here for additional data file.
Authors: Jeroen C van Rijn; Johannes B Reitsma; Jaap Stoker; Patrick M Bossuyt; Sander J van Deventer; Evelien Dekker Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2006-02 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: S J Winawer; A G Zauber; M N Ho; M J O'Brien; L S Gottlieb; S S Sternberg; J D Waye; M Schapiro; J H Bond; J F Panish Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1993-12-30 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Jatin Roper; Tuomas Tammela; Adam Akkad; Mohammad Almeqdadi; Sebastian B Santos; Tyler Jacks; Ömer H Yilmaz Journal: Nat Protoc Date: 2018-01-04 Impact factor: 13.491
Authors: Sandra P Prieto; Keith K Lai; Jonathan A Laryea; Jason S Mizell; William C Mustain; Timothy J Muldoon Journal: Biomed Opt Express Date: 2017-03-24 Impact factor: 3.732
Authors: Zhonglin Liu; Brian D Gray; Christy Barber; Michael Bernas; Minying Cai; Lars R Furenlid; Andrew Rouse; Charmi Patel; Bhaskar Banerjee; Rongguang Liang; Arthur F Gmitro; Marlys H Witte; Koon Y Pak; James M Woolfenden Journal: J Control Release Date: 2016-08-26 Impact factor: 9.776
Authors: Sharon J Miller; Kevin A Heist; Ying Feng; Craig J Galbán; Alnawaz Rehemtulla; Brian D Ross; Eric R Fearon; Thomas D Wang Journal: Transl Oncol Date: 2012-10-01 Impact factor: 4.243