Alina Langer1, Nicoleta Ilie. 1. Department of Restorative Dentistry, Dental School of the Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Goethestr. 70, 80336, Munich, Germany.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This study evaluates the dentin infiltration ability of various types of adhesives and compares four classes of adhesive systems with regard to this property. The infiltration is determined quantitatively, characterized as tag length and ratio of infiltration, and qualitatively, characterized as homogeneity, regularity, and continuity of the resin tags. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Flat dentin surfaces from 140 halves of caries-free molars were bonded with four classes of adhesive systems. The adhesives (n = 20) were labeled with rhodamine B isothiocyanate and applied on the occlusal dentin following the manufacturer's recommendations and were subsequently light cured, 20 s. Then a 2-mm thick composite layer was applied and light cured, 20 s. The specimens were stored in distilled water at 37°C, 24 h. Two slices were sectioned mesio-distally from each sample and were investigated with a confocal laser scanning microscope. The measurements were done at 0.5, 1.5, and 2.5 mm from the enamel-dentin junction. The data were analyzed by using analysis of variance and the general linear model. RESULTS: The class of adhesive, the composition, and the dentin position were significant factors affecting the investigated parameters. The use of etch and rinse adhesives in comparison to self-etch adhesives provided the formation of longer, more homogeneous, very regularly distributed but mostly fractured tags. CONCLUSIONS: A comparison of adhesives confirmed that etch and rinse systems remain better in bond infiltration. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: While the importance of tags formation on bonding is still controversially discussed, adhesive systems with a high ratio of infiltration might better protect the tooth against microorganism contamination.
OBJECTIVES: This study evaluates the dentin infiltration ability of various types of adhesives and compares four classes of adhesive systems with regard to this property. The infiltration is determined quantitatively, characterized as tag length and ratio of infiltration, and qualitatively, characterized as homogeneity, regularity, and continuity of the resin tags. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Flat dentin surfaces from 140 halves of caries-free molars were bonded with four classes of adhesive systems. The adhesives (n = 20) were labeled with rhodamine B isothiocyanate and applied on the occlusal dentin following the manufacturer's recommendations and were subsequently light cured, 20 s. Then a 2-mm thick composite layer was applied and light cured, 20 s. The specimens were stored in distilled water at 37°C, 24 h. Two slices were sectioned mesio-distally from each sample and were investigated with a confocal laser scanning microscope. The measurements were done at 0.5, 1.5, and 2.5 mm from the enamel-dentin junction. The data were analyzed by using analysis of variance and the general linear model. RESULTS: The class of adhesive, the composition, and the dentin position were significant factors affecting the investigated parameters. The use of etch and rinse adhesives in comparison to self-etch adhesives provided the formation of longer, more homogeneous, very regularly distributed but mostly fractured tags. CONCLUSIONS: A comparison of adhesives confirmed that etch and rinse systems remain better in bond infiltration. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: While the importance of tags formation on bonding is still controversially discussed, adhesive systems with a high ratio of infiltration might better protect the tooth against microorganism contamination.
Authors: Lisa A Knobloch; David Gailey; Shereen Azer; William M Johnston; Nancy Clelland; Ronald E Kerby Journal: J Prosthet Dent Date: 2007-04 Impact factor: 3.426
Authors: Atsushi Mine; Jan De Munck; Kirsten L Van Landuyt; André Poitevin; Takuo Kuboki; Yasuhiro Yoshida; Kazuomi Suzuki; Paul Lambrechts; Bart Van Meerbeek Journal: J Dent Date: 2008-07-14 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: S Inoue; K Koshiro; Y Yoshida; J De Munck; K Nagakane; K Suzuki; H Sano; B Van Meerbeek Journal: J Dent Res Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 6.116
Authors: Mohamed M Awad; Feras Alhalabi; Mohamed Bamuqadm; Abdulmalik Alhoti; Abdulilah Almasaad; Ali Robiaan; Ahmed Almahdy; Ali Alrahlah; Mohammed H Ahmed Journal: Odontology Date: 2022-09-29 Impact factor: 2.885
Authors: Tatiane Miranda Manzoli; Joissi Ferrari Zaniboni; João Felipe Besegato; Flávia Angélica Guiotti; Andréa Abi Rached Dantas; Milton Carlos Kuga Journal: Restor Dent Endod Date: 2022-04-06
Authors: Yuncong Li; Xiaoyi Hu; Yang Xia; Yadong Ji; Jianping Ruan; Michael D Weir; Xiaoying Lin; Zhihong Nie; Ning Gu; Radi Masri; Xiaofeng Chang; Hockin H K Xu Journal: Dent Mater Date: 2018-06-21 Impact factor: 5.304
Authors: Maurizio D'Amario; Chiara Piccioni; Stefano Di Carlo; Francesca De Angelis; Silvia Caruso; Mario Capogreco Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2017-12-17 Impact factor: 3.411