Literature DB >> 22371536

Birmingham hip resurfacing at a mean of ten years: results from an independent centre.

G Coulter1, D A Young, R E Dalziel, A J Shimmin.   

Abstract

We report the findings of an independent review of 230 consecutive Birmingham hip resurfacings (BHRs) in 213 patients (230 hips) at a mean follow-up of 10.4 years (9.6 to 11.7). A total of 11 hips underwent revision; six patients (six hips) died from unrelated causes; and 13 patients (16 hips) were lost to follow-up. The survival rate for the whole cohort was 94.5% (95% confidence interval (CI) 90.1 to 96.9). The survival rate in women was 89.1% (95% CI 79.2 to 94.4) and in men was 97.5% (95% CI 92.4 to 99.2). Women were 1.4 times more likely to suffer failure than men. For each millimetre increase in component size there was a 19% lower chance of a failure. The mean Oxford hip score was 45.0 (median 47.0, 28 to 48); mean University of California, Los Angeles activity score was 7.4 (median 8.0, 3 to 9); mean patient satisfaction score was 1.4 (median 1.0, 0 to 9). A total of eight hips had lysis in the femoral neck and two hips had acetabular lysis. One hip had progressive radiological changes around the peg of the femoral component. There was no evidence of progressive neck narrowing between five and ten years. Our results confirm that BHR provides good functional outcome and durability for men, at a mean follow-up of ten years. We are now reluctant to undertake hip resurfacing in women with this implant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22371536     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.94B3.28185

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  31 in total

1.  Letter to the editor: the withdrawn ASR™ THA and hip resurfacing systems: how have our patients fared over 1 to 6 years?

Authors:  Harlan C Amstutz; Michel J Le Duff
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Outcome of Birmingham hip resurfacing at ten years: role of routine whole blood metal ion measurements in screening for pseudotumours.

Authors:  Aleksi Reito; Timo Puolakka; Petra Elo; Jorma Pajamäki; Antti Eskelinen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Survivorship and clinical outcome of Birmingham hip resurfacing: a minimum ten years' follow-up.

Authors:  Md Quamar Azam; Stephen McMahon; Gabrielle Hawdon; Sukesh Rao Sankineani
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Wear testing of a canine hip resurfacing implant that uses highly cross-linked polyethylene.

Authors:  Kevin J Warburton; John B Everingham; Jillian L Helms; Andrew J Kazanovicz; Katherine A Hollar; Jeff D Brourman; Steven M Fox; Trevor J Lujan
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 3.494

5.  Are There Long-term Benefits to Cementing the Metaphyseal Stem in Hip Resurfacing?

Authors:  Harlan C Amstutz; Michel J Le Duff; Sandeep K Bhaurla
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 6.  The future role of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing.

Authors:  Gulraj S Matharu; Hemant G Pandit; David W Murray; Ronan B C Treacy
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Patients report improvement in quality of life and satisfaction after hip resurfacing arthroplasty.

Authors:  Wael A Rahman; Nelson V Greidanus; Alexander Siegmeth; Bassam A Masri; Clive P Duncan; Donald S Garbuz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Long-term results of Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty in Asian patients.

Authors:  Keisuke Uemura; Masaki Takao; Hidetoshi Hamada; Takashi Sakai; Kenji Ohzono; Nobuhiko Sugano
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 1.731

9.  MRI predicts ALVAL and tissue damage in metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Danyal H Nawabi; Stephanie Gold; Steven Lyman; Kara Fields; Douglas E Padgett; Hollis G Potter
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Conversion of a failed hip resurfacing arthroplasty to total hip arthroplasty: pearls and pitfalls.

Authors:  Jacob A Haynes; Jeffrey B Stambough; Robert L Barrack; Denis Nam
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.