Literature DB >> 22370914

Model to estimate survival in ambulatory patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Ju Dong Yang1, W Ray Kim, Kyung Woo Park, Roongruedee Chaiteerakij, Bohyun Kim, Schuyler O Sanderson, Joseph J Larson, Rachel A Pedersen, Terry M Therneau, Gregory J Gores, Lewis R Roberts, Joong-Won Park.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is determined by the extent of the tumor and the underlying liver function. We aimed to develop a survival model for HCC based on objective parameters including the Model for Endstage Liver Disease (MELD) as a gauge of liver dysfunction. This analysis is based on 477 patients with HCC seen at Mayo Clinic Rochester between 1994 and 2008 (derivation cohort) and 904 patients at the Korean National Cancer Center between 2000 and 2003 (validation cohort). Multivariate proportional hazards models and corresponding risk score were created based on baseline demographic, clinical, and tumor characteristics. Internal and external validation of the model was performed. Discrimination and calibration of this new model were compared against existing models including Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC), Cancer of the Liver Italian Program (CLIP), and Japan Integrated Staging (JIS) scores. The majority of the patients had viral hepatitis as the underlying liver disease (100% in the derivation cohort and 85% in the validation cohort). The survival model incorporated MELD, age, number of tumor nodules, size of the largest nodule, vascular invasion, metastasis, serum albumin, and alpha-fetoprotein. In cross-validation, the coefficients remained largely unchanged between iterations. Observed survival in the validation cohort matched closely with what was predicted by the model. The concordance (c)-statistic for this model (0.77) was superior to that for BCLC (0.71), CLIP (0.70), or JIS (0.70). The score was able to further classify patient survival within each stage of the BCLC classification.
CONCLUSION: A new model to predict survival of HCC patients based on objective parameters provides refined prognostication and supplements the BCLC classification.
Copyright © 2012 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22370914      PMCID: PMC3564594          DOI: 10.1002/hep.25680

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hepatology        ISSN: 0270-9139            Impact factor:   17.425


  21 in total

1.  Clinical management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Conclusions of the Barcelona-2000 EASL conference. European Association for the Study of the Liver.

Authors:  J Bruix; M Sherman; J M Llovet; M Beaugrand; R Lencioni; A K Burroughs; E Christensen; L Pagliaro; M Colombo; J Rodés
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 25.083

Review 2.  Prognostic staging system for hepatocellular carcinoma (CLIP score): its value and limitations, and a proposal for a new staging system, the Japan Integrated Staging Score (JIS score).

Authors:  Masatoshi Kudo; Hobyung Chung; Yukio Osaki
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 7.527

3.  A new prognostic classification for predicting survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Groupe d'Etude et de Traitement du Carcinome Hépatocellulaire.

Authors:  S Chevret; J C Trinchet; D Mathieu; A A Rached; M Beaugrand; C Chastang
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 25.083

4.  A new prognostic system for hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective study of 435 patients: the Cancer of the Liver Italian Program (CLIP) investigators.

Authors: 
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 17.425

5.  Assessing the generalizability of prognostic information.

Authors:  A C Justice; K E Covinsky; J A Berlin
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1999-03-16       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 6.  A model to predict survival in patients with end-stage liver disease.

Authors:  P S Kamath; R H Wiesner; M Malinchoc; W Kremers; T M Therneau; C L Kosberg; G D'Amico; E R Dickson; W R Kim
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 17.425

7.  Prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: the BCLC staging classification.

Authors:  J M Llovet; C Brú; J Bruix
Journal:  Semin Liver Dis       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 6.115

8.  Model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) and allocation of donor livers.

Authors:  Russell Wiesner; Erick Edwards; Richard Freeman; Ann Harper; Ray Kim; Patrick Kamath; Walter Kremers; John Lake; Todd Howard; Robert M Merion; Robert A Wolfe; Ruud Krom
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 22.682

9.  Natural history of hepatocellular carcinoma and prognosis in relation to treatment. Study of 850 patients.

Authors:  K Okuda; T Ohtsuki; H Obata; M Tomimatsu; N Okazaki; H Hasegawa; Y Nakajima; K Ohnishi
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1985-08-15       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  [Practice guideline for diagnosis and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma].

Authors:  Joong Won Park
Journal:  Korean J Hepatol       Date:  2004-06
View more
  33 in total

1.  Prognosis of acute-on-chronic liver failure patients treated with artificial liver support system.

Authors:  Pi-Qi Zhou; Shao-Ping Zheng; Min Yu; Sheng-Song He; Zhi-Hong Weng
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Proposal of objective morphological classification system for hepatocellular carcinoma using preoperative multiphase computed tomography.

Authors:  Hisashi Nakayama; Tadatoshi Takayama; Takao Okubo; Tokio Higaki; Yutaka Midorikawa; Masamichi Moriguchi; Akiyoshi Itoh
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-11-16       Impact factor: 7.527

Review 3.  Staging systems for hepatocellular carcinoma: Current status and future perspectives.

Authors:  Akiyoshi Kinoshita; Hiroshi Onoda; Nao Fushiya; Kazuhiko Koike; Hirokazu Nishino; Hisao Tajiri
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2015-03-27

4.  2014 Korean Liver Cancer Study Group-National Cancer Center Korea practice guideline for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors: 
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 3.500

5.  Validation of a model to estimate survival in ambulatory patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a single-centre cohort study.

Authors:  Bo Hyun Kim; Joong-Won Park; Byung-Ho Nam; Hee Won Kwak; W Ray Kim
Journal:  Liver Int       Date:  2014-03-24       Impact factor: 5.828

6.  A Comparison of Staging Systems for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in a Multicenter US Cohort.

Authors:  Neehar D Parikh; Steve Scaglione; Yumeng Li; Corey Powell; Olutola A Yerokun; Pauline Devlin; Shaham Mumtaz; Sahil Mittal; Amit G Singal
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2017-10-05       Impact factor: 11.382

7.  Validation of the Hong Kong Liver Cancer Staging System in Determining Prognosis of the North American Patients Following Intra-arterial Therapy.

Authors:  Jae Ho Sohn; Rafael Duran; Yan Zhao; Florian Fleckenstein; Julius Chapiro; Sonia Sahu; Rüdiger E Schernthaner; Tianchen Qian; Howard Lee; Li Zhao; James Hamilton; Constantine Frangakis; MingDe Lin; Riad Salem; Jean-Francois Geschwind
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-11-12       Impact factor: 11.382

8.  Green tea consumption: A potential chemopreventive measure for hepatocellular carcinoma?

Authors:  Ju Dong Yang; Harmeet Malhi
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 17.425

9.  Clinical presentation and survival of Asian and non-Asian patients with HCV-related hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Benjamin Yip; James M Wantuck; Lily H Kim; Robert J Wong; Aijaz Ahmed; Gabriel Garcia; Mindie H Nguyen
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 3.199

10.  2014 KLCSG-NCC Korea Practice Guideline for the Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors: 
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2015-05-23       Impact factor: 4.519

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.