Jae Ho Sohn1, Rafael Duran1, Yan Zhao1, Florian Fleckenstein1, Julius Chapiro1, Sonia Sahu1, Rüdiger E Schernthaner1, Tianchen Qian2, Howard Lee1, Li Zhao1, James Hamilton3, Constantine Frangakis2, MingDe Lin4, Riad Salem5, Jean-Francois Geschwind6. 1. Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut. 2. Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland. 3. Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland. 4. Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut; U/S Imaging and Interventions (UII), Philips Research North America, Cambridge, Massachusetts. 5. Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois. 6. Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut. Electronic address: jeff.geschwind@yale.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS: There is debate over the best way to stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We attempted to validate the prognostic and clinical utility of the recently developed Hong Kong Liver Cancer (HKLC) staging system, a hepatitis B-based model, and compared data with that from the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging system in a North American population that underwent intra-arterial therapy (IAT). METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of data from 1009 patients with HCC who underwent IAT from 2000 through 2014. Most patients had hepatitis C or unresectable tumors; all patients underwent IAT, with or without resection, transplantation, and/or systemic chemotherapy. We calculated HCC stage for each patient using 5-stage HKLC (HKLC-5) and 9-stage HKLC (HKLC-9) system classifications, and the BCLC system. Survival information was collected up until the end of 2014 at which point living or unconfirmed patients were censored. We compared performance of the BCLC, HKLC-5, and HKLC-9 systems in predicting patient outcomes using Kaplan-Meier estimates, calibration plots, C statistic, Akaike information criterion, and the likelihood ratio test. RESULTS: Median overall survival time, calculated from first IAT until date of death or censorship, for the entire cohort (all stages) was 9.8 months. The BCLC and HKLC staging systems predicted patient survival times with significance (P < .001). HKLC-5 and HKLC-9 each demonstrated good calibration. The HKLC-5 system outperformed the BCLC system in predicting patient survival times (HKLC C = 0.71, Akaike information criterion = 6242; BCLC C = 0.64, Akaike information criterion = 6320), reducing error in predicting survival time (HKLC reduced error by 14%, BCLC reduced error by 12%), and homogeneity (HKLC chi-square = 201, P < .001; BCLC chi-square = 119, P < .001) and monotonicity (HKLC linear trend chi-square = 193, P < .001; BCLC linear trend chi-square = 111, P < .001). Small proportions of patients with HCC of stages IV or V, according to the HKLC system, survived for 6 months and 4 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent IAT for unresectable HCC, we found the HKLC-5 staging system to have the best combination of performances in survival separation, calibration, and discrimination; it consistently outperformed the BCLC system in predicting survival times of patients. The HKLC system identified patients with HCC of stages IV and V who are unlikely to benefit from IAT.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: There is debate over the best way to stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We attempted to validate the prognostic and clinical utility of the recently developed Hong Kong Liver Cancer (HKLC) staging system, a hepatitis B-based model, and compared data with that from the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging system in a North American population that underwent intra-arterial therapy (IAT). METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of data from 1009 patients with HCC who underwent IAT from 2000 through 2014. Most patients had hepatitis C or unresectable tumors; all patients underwent IAT, with or without resection, transplantation, and/or systemic chemotherapy. We calculated HCC stage for each patient using 5-stage HKLC (HKLC-5) and 9-stage HKLC (HKLC-9) system classifications, and the BCLC system. Survival information was collected up until the end of 2014 at which point living or unconfirmed patients were censored. We compared performance of the BCLC, HKLC-5, and HKLC-9 systems in predicting patient outcomes using Kaplan-Meier estimates, calibration plots, C statistic, Akaike information criterion, and the likelihood ratio test. RESULTS: Median overall survival time, calculated from first IAT until date of death or censorship, for the entire cohort (all stages) was 9.8 months. The BCLC and HKLC staging systems predicted patient survival times with significance (P < .001). HKLC-5 and HKLC-9 each demonstrated good calibration. The HKLC-5 system outperformed the BCLC system in predicting patient survival times (HKLC C = 0.71, Akaike information criterion = 6242; BCLC C = 0.64, Akaike information criterion = 6320), reducing error in predicting survival time (HKLC reduced error by 14%, BCLC reduced error by 12%), and homogeneity (HKLC chi-square = 201, P < .001; BCLC chi-square = 119, P < .001) and monotonicity (HKLC linear trend chi-square = 193, P < .001; BCLC linear trend chi-square = 111, P < .001). Small proportions of patients with HCC of stages IV or V, according to the HKLC system, survived for 6 months and 4 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent IAT for unresectable HCC, we found the HKLC-5 staging system to have the best combination of performances in survival separation, calibration, and discrimination; it consistently outperformed the BCLC system in predicting survival times of patients. The HKLC system identified patients with HCC of stages IV and V who are unlikely to benefit from IAT.
Authors: Howard Lee; Julius Chapiro; Rüdiger Schernthaner; Rafael Duran; Zhijun Wang; Boris Gorodetski; Jean-François Geschwind; MingDe Lin Journal: Acad Radiol Date: 2015-01-29 Impact factor: 3.173
Authors: Khairuddin Memon; Laura M Kulik; Robert J Lewandowski; Edward Wang; Jonathan Wang; Robert K Ryu; Ryan Hickey; Michael Vouche; Talia Baker; Daniel Ganger; Vanessa L Gates; Ali Habib; Mary F Mulcahy; Riad Salem Journal: J Vasc Interv Radiol Date: 2014-03-07 Impact factor: 3.464
Authors: Ewout W Steyerberg; Andrew J Vickers; Nancy R Cook; Thomas Gerds; Mithat Gonen; Nancy Obuchowski; Michael J Pencina; Michael W Kattan Journal: Epidemiology Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 4.822
Authors: Laura M Kulik; Brian I Carr; Mary F Mulcahy; Robert J Lewandowski; Bassel Atassi; Robert K Ryu; Kent T Sato; Al Benson; Albert A Nemcek; Vanessa L Gates; Michael Abecassis; Reed A Omary; Riad Salem Journal: Hepatology Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Bradley Spieler; Carl Sabottke; Ahmed W Moawad; Ahmed M Gabr; Mustafa R Bashir; Richard Kinh Gian Do; Vahid Yaghmai; Radu Rozenberg; Marielia Gerena; Joseph Yacoub; Khaled M Elsayes Journal: Abdom Radiol (NY) Date: 2021-03-31
Authors: Michael C Wallace; Matthew Knuiman; Yi Huang; George Garas; Leon A Adams; Gerry MacQuillan; David B Preen; Gary P Jeffrey Journal: Dig Dis Sci Date: 2018-05-28 Impact factor: 3.199
Authors: Adam Swersky; Laura Kulik; Aparna Kalyan; Karen Grace; Juan Carlos Caicedo; Robert J Lewandowski; Riad Salem Journal: Semin Intervent Radiol Date: 2021-10-07 Impact factor: 1.780
Authors: Sophia Heinrich; Martin Sprinzl; Irene Schmidtmann; Elena Heil; Sandra Koch; Carolin Czauderna; Bernd Heinrich; Laurence Philippe P Diggs; Marcus-Alexander Wörns; Roman Kloeckner; Peter R Galle; Jens U Marquardt; Arndt Weinmann Journal: United European Gastroenterol J Date: 2020-01-29 Impact factor: 4.623
Authors: Ali Morshid; Khaled M Elsayes; Ahmed M Khalaf; Mohab M Elmohr; Justin Yu; Ahmed O Kaseb; Manal Hassan; Armeen Mahvash; Zhihui Wang; John D Hazle; David Fuentes Journal: Radiol Artif Intell Date: 2019-09-25
Authors: Tom Tan-To Cheung; Philip Chong-Hei Kwok; Stephen Chan; Chin-Cheung Cheung; Ann-Shing Lee; Victor Lee; Hoi-Ching Cheng; Nam-Hung Chia; Charing C N Chong; Tak-Wing Lai; Ada L Y Law; Mai-Yee Luk; Chi Chung Tong; Thomas C C Yau Journal: Liver Cancer Date: 2018-01-25 Impact factor: 11.740