Literature DB >> 22369643

Targeting the von Hippel-Lindau E3 ubiquitin ligase using small molecules to disrupt the VHL/HIF-1α interaction.

Dennis L Buckley1, Inge Van Molle, Peter C Gareiss, Hyun Seop Tae, Julien Michel, Devin J Noblin, William L Jorgensen, Alessio Ciulli, Craig M Crews.   

Abstract

E3 ubiquitin ligases, which bind protein targets, leading to their ubiquitination and subsequent degradation, are attractive drug targets due to their exquisite substrate specificity. However, the development of small-molecule inhibitors has proven extraordinarily challenging as modulation of E3 ligase activities requires the targeting of protein-protein interactions. Using rational design, we have generated the first small molecule targeting the von Hippel-Lindau protein (VHL), the substrate recognition subunit of an E3 ligase, and an important target in cancer, chronic anemia, and ischemia. We have also obtained the crystal structure of VHL bound to our most potent inhibitor, confirming that the compound mimics the binding mode of the transcription factor HIF-1α, a substrate of VHL. These results have the potential to guide future development of improved lead compounds as therapeutics for the treatment of chronic anemia and ischemia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22369643      PMCID: PMC3448299          DOI: 10.1021/ja209924v

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Chem Soc        ISSN: 0002-7863            Impact factor:   15.419


E3 ubiquitin ligases (of which over 600 are known in humans)[1] confer substrate specificity for ubiquitination and are more attractive therapeutic targets than general proteasome inhibitors[4,5] due to their specificity for a small number of protein substrates. Unfortunately, the development of E3 ligase inhibitors has proven challenging, in part due to the fact that they must disrupt protein–protein interactions.[6] These interactions are notoriously difficult to target using small molecules due to their large contact surfaces and the shallow grooves or flat interfaces involved. Conversely, most small-molecule drugs bind enzymes or receptors in tight and well-defined pockets.[7] Since the discovery of nutlins, the first small-molecule E3 ligase inhibitors,[8] a few additional compounds have been reported that target inhibitors of apoptosis proteins (IAPs),[9,10] SCFMet30,[11] and SCFCdc4;[12] however, the field remains underdeveloped. One E3 ubiquitin ligase with exciting therapeutic potential is the von Hippel–Lindau (VHL) complex consisting of VHL, elongins B and C, cullin 2, and ring box protein 1 (Rbx1).[13] The primary substrate of VHL is hypoxia-inducible factor 1α (HIF-1α), a transcription factor that upregulates numerous genes such as the pro-angiogenic growth factor, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), glucose transporter, GLUT1, and the red blood cell inducing cytokine, erythropoietin, in response to low oxygen levels.[3] While HIF-1α is constitutively expressed, its intracellular levels are kept very low under normoxic conditions via its hydroxylation by prolyl hydroxylase domain (PHD) enzymes and subsequent VHL-mediated ubiquitination (Figure 1).[14] Small-molecule inhibition of this pathway therefore would lead to increased endogenous erythropoietin production and could supplant the current use of recombinant erythropoietin to treat chronic anemia associated with chronic kidney disease and cancer chemotherapy.[15] To this end, PHD inhibitors are under examination in clinical trials; however, a possible alternative would be the development of an inhibitor of the VHL/HIF-1α interaction. Such an inhibitor may avoid the HIF-independent off-target effects observed with PHD inhibitors,[16] which have already proven immensely useful as biological probes.[17,18]
Figure 1

(A) HIF-1α accumulation leads to the transcriptional upregulation of genes involved in the hypoxic response, such as erythropoietin (Epo), VEGF and others. (B) Under normoxic conditions, HIF-1α is hydroxylated, recognized by VHL, ubiquitinated, and degraded by the proteasome, preventing transcriptional upregulation.

(A) HIF-1α accumulation leads to the transcriptional upregulation of genes involved in the hypoxic response, such as erythropoietin (Epo), VEGF and others. (B) Under normoxic conditions, HIF-1α is hydroxylated, recognized by VHL, ubiquitinated, and degraded by the proteasome, preventing transcriptional upregulation. While VHL also has HIF-1α-independent functions such as binding to and stabilizing p53 and acting as an adaptor for the phosphorylation of CARD9,[3] these proteins likely bind VHL differently than HIF-1α. In fact, previous work by Willam et al. has shown that polypeptides containing the HIF-1α oxygen-dependent degradation domains (ODDs) linked to the cell-permeable tat translocation domain stabilize HIF and induce an angiogenic response, suggesting that competitive inhibition of VHL is capable of producing a downstream biological response.[19] We hypothesized that small-molecule inhibitors of the VHL/HIF-1α interaction could be rationally designed using hydroxyproline (Hyp) as a starting point, since residue Hyp564 on HIF-1α makes key interactions with VHL[20,21] and is crucial for HIF-1α binding.[22] We used the de novo design software BOMB to guide the selection of plausible hydroxyproline analogues.[23]1 and 2 were synthesized to test a promising design featuring an isoxazole moiety positioned to interact with a crystallographic water observed in the structure of VHL bound to the HIF-1α peptide (549–582)[20] and a benzyl group stacked along the side chain of Tyr98. The compounds’ ability to bind to VHL was measured by the competition of a fluorescent HIF-1α peptide, FAM-DEALA-Hyp-YIPD (Kd = 560 nM).[24] Fluorescence polarization (FP) of the peptide was measured in the presence and in the absence of the VCB complex consisting of VHL, elongin B, and elongin C, to get the maximum and minimum values for polarization, respectively. The polarization was then measured in the presence of VCB and serial dilutions of the small-molecule ligands in order to observe the competition of the fluorescent peptide. These values were then normalized to the maximum and minimum polarization values to calculate percent inhibition of the interaction, from which an IC50 was determined. Both compounds were able to displace the fluorescent peptide albeit at high concentrations (Table 1). In addition, the nonfluorescent DEALA-Hyp-YIPD was used as a positive control and found to bind with IC50 = 0.91 μM and Kd = 180 nM by ITC. While the smaller 3 was unable to fully displace the fluorescent peptide under the same conditions, we observed binding to VHL through the use of WaterLOGSY NMR spectroscopy,[25] as demonstrated by the positive ligand signals due to cross-relaxation from water in the presence of protein (Figure 2). As no binding was observed with smaller hydroxyproline fragments, this suggested that we identified a minimal pharmacophore.
Table 1

Binding of Initial Ligands to VHL

Average IC50 values were determined from three independent trials, each in triplicate.

Figure 2

WaterLOGSY NMR spectroscopy shows binding of 3, but not L-Hyp or NAc-Hyp-NMe, to VHL.

Average IC50 values were determined from three independent trials, each in triplicate. WaterLOGSY NMR spectroscopy shows binding of 3, but not L-Hyp or NAc-Hyp-NMe, to VHL. Encouraged by these initial results, we sought to increase the affinity of our VHL ligands by modifying the benzylamine moiety of 1 while maintaining the methyl-isoxazole fragment. In order to generate analogues rapidly, we developed a solid-phase synthesis that involved the attachment of Fmoc-Hyp-OAllyl to Wang resin.[26] Fmoc deprotection, coupling with 3-methyl-5-isoxazoleacetic acid followed by allyl ester deprotection, subsequent coupling with various amines, and cleavage with trifluoroacetic acid led to the rapid generation of VHL ligands (Scheme 1).[27,28] These ligands were then tested for their ability to bind VHL using the HIF-1α peptide FP displacement assay.
Scheme 1

Solid-Phase Synthesis of VHL Ligands

Incorporation of various halogenated benzylamines showed that para substitution yielded the highest affinity and that there were only slight differences of affinity between chlorides and bromides, although the corresponding fluoride was less potent. We also found that substitution with electron-withdrawing groups such as esters, nitro groups, nitriles, and ketones led to more potent ligands than substitution with electron-donating methoxy and tert-butyl substituents. We then considered larger heterocyclic substituents at the para position of the benzylamine moiety and synthesized 15, which was found to bind with a 4.1 μM IC50 value (Table 2). The Kd of 15 was determined by ITC to be 5.4 ± 0.2 μM (Figure S3 in the ).
Table 2

Structure–Activity Relationship of VHL Ligands

 RIC50 (μM)aSEM (μM)
13-Cl11710
4H13010
52-Cl14913
64-Cl20.51.9
74-F14913
84-Br32.03.6
94-tBu>250N/A
104-OMe10613
114-CO2Me39.42.2
124-NO216.00.6
134-CN60.35.3
144-COMe22.62.0
154-(5-oxazoyl)4.10.4

Average IC50 values were determined from three independent trials, each in triplicate.

Average IC50 values were determined from three independent trials, each in triplicate. The cocrystal structure of VHL bound to 15 confirmed that it bound to the same site on VHL as HIF-1α and that the hydroxyproline ring recapitulates the interactions seen in the HIF-1α peptide:VHL complex (Figure 3).[20,21] The hydroxyl group makes contacts with both His115 and Ser111, and the amide NH makes a contact with the His110 carbonyl (Figure 4). Furthermore, the crystal structure shows that the aryl ring is involved in a side-on interaction with the Tyr98 phenol, possibly explaining the higher affinity of ligands containing electron-poor aryl groups. In addition, a hydrogen bond is formed between the oxazole CH and the Pro99 carboxyl oxygen. Furthermore, the side chain of Arg107 reorients slightly (Figure S2 in the Supporting Information), and hydrogen bonds to the oxazole nitrogen of the inhibitor. These structural data will allow for further rational design to optimize the potency of future inhibitors of the VHL/HIF-1α interaction.
Figure 3

The 2.9 Å cocrystal structure of 15 (white carbons) bound to VHL, indicating that its binding mimics that of the HIF-1α peptide (yellow carbons, PDB 1LM8(21)).

Figure 4

Graphical representation showing the key interactions between 15 and VHL.

The 2.9 Å cocrystal structure of 15 (white carbons) bound to VHL, indicating that its binding mimics that of the HIF-1α peptide (yellow carbons, PDB 1LM8(21)). Graphical representation showing the key interactions between 15 and VHL. In summary, we have described the design and synthesis of the first small-molecule ligands for VHL, the protein recognition subunit of an E3 ubiquitin ligase. Starting from the minimal hydroxyproline recognition unit and using in silico design as well as structure-guided medicinal chemistry, we were able to improve ligand affinity for VHL to single digit micromolar. Furthermore, the most potent inhibitor was cocrystallized with VHL, and shown to bind at the HIF-1α binding site. These small-molecule inhibitors of the VHL/HIF-1α protein–protein interaction have the potential to be developed into cell-penetrant chemical probes that mimic the hypoxic response as well as novel therapeutics to treat disease conditions such as chronic anemia, acute ischemia, and stroke.
  27 in total

Review 1.  Hypoxia-inducible factor 1: oxygen homeostasis and disease pathophysiology.

Authors:  G L Semenza
Journal:  Trends Mol Med       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 11.951

2.  Total synthesis of lysobactin.

Authors:  Aikomari Guzman-Martinez; Ryan Lamer; Michael S VanNieuwenhze
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2007-04-14       Impact factor: 15.419

Review 3.  Harnessing the hypoxia-inducible factor in cancer and ischemic disease.

Authors:  M Christiane Brahimi-Horn; Jacques Pouysségur
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  2006-10-20       Impact factor: 5.858

Review 4.  HIF prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors for anemia.

Authors:  Eugene Muchnik; Joshua Kaplan
Journal:  Expert Opin Investig Drugs       Date:  2011-03-16       Impact factor: 6.206

5.  Multistep synthesis of 2,5-diketopiperazines on different solid supports monitored by high resolution magic angle spinning NMR spectroscopy.

Authors:  A Bianco; J Furrer; D Limal; G Guichard; K Elbayed; J Raya; M Piotto; J P Briand
Journal:  J Comb Chem       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec

6.  A photoreactive small-molecule probe for 2-oxoglutarate oxygenases.

Authors:  Akane Kawamura; Alexander Wolf; Dante Rotili; Mikael Altun; Roman Fischer; Ivanhoe K H Leung; Mukram M Mackeen; Ya-Min Tian; Peter J Ratcliffe; Antonello Mai; Benedikt M Kessler; Christopher J Schofield
Journal:  Chem Biol       Date:  2011-05-27

7.  Peptide blockade of HIFalpha degradation modulates cellular metabolism and angiogenesis.

Authors:  Carsten Willam; Norma Masson; Ya-Min Tian; S Aleema Mahmood; Michael I Wilson; Roy Bicknell; Kai-Uwe Eckardt; Patrick H Maxwell; Peter J Ratcliffe; Christopher W Pugh
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-07-29       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Potent and selective inhibitors of the proteasome: dipeptidyl boronic acids.

Authors:  J Adams; M Behnke; S Chen; A A Cruickshank; L R Dick; L Grenier; J M Klunder; Y T Ma; L Plamondon; R L Stein
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem Lett       Date:  1998-02-17       Impact factor: 2.823

Review 9.  The von Hippel-Lindau tumour suppressor protein: O2 sensing and cancer.

Authors:  William G Kaelin
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2008-10-16       Impact factor: 60.716

10.  Differential sensitivity of hypoxia inducible factor hydroxylation sites to hypoxia and hydroxylase inhibitors.

Authors:  Ya-Min Tian; Kar Kheng Yeoh; Myung Kyu Lee; Tuula Eriksson; Benedikt M Kessler; Holger B Kramer; Mariola J Edelmann; Carsten Willam; Christopher W Pugh; Christopher J Schofield; Peter J Ratcliffe
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2011-02-18       Impact factor: 5.157

View more
  128 in total

Review 1.  Focusing on shared subpockets - new developments in fragment-based drug discovery.

Authors:  Eman M M Abdelraheem; Carlos J Camacho; Alexander Dömling
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Discov       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 6.098

2.  Insights into Cullin-RING E3 ubiquitin ligase recruitment: structure of the VHL-EloBC-Cul2 complex.

Authors:  Henry C Nguyen; Haitao Yang; Jennifer L Fribourgh; Leslie S Wolfe; Yong Xiong
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2015-02-05       Impact factor: 5.006

3.  PROTAC-induced BET protein degradation as a therapy for castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Authors:  Kanak Raina; Jing Lu; Yimin Qian; Martha Altieri; Deborah Gordon; Ann Marie K Rossi; Jing Wang; Xin Chen; Hanqing Dong; Kam Siu; James D Winkler; Andrew P Crew; Craig M Crews; Kevin G Coleman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Ligand deconstruction: Why some fragment binding positions are conserved and others are not.

Authors:  Dima Kozakov; David R Hall; Stefan Jehle; Sefan Jehle; Lingqi Luo; Stefan O Ochiana; Elizabeth V Jones; Michael Pollastri; Karen N Allen; Adrian Whitty; Sandor Vajda
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  PROTACs: great opportunities for academia and industry.

Authors:  Xiuyun Sun; Hongying Gao; Yiqing Yang; Ming He; Yue Wu; Yugang Song; Yan Tong; Yu Rao
Journal:  Signal Transduct Target Ther       Date:  2019-12-24

Review 6.  Advances in targeting 'undruggable' transcription factors with small molecules.

Authors:  Matthew J Henley; Angela N Koehler
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 84.694

Review 7.  Chemical modulation of transcription factors.

Authors:  Bianca Wiedemann; Jörn Weisner; Daniel Rauh
Journal:  Medchemcomm       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 3.597

Review 8.  Targeted Protein Degradation by Small Molecules.

Authors:  Daniel P Bondeson; Craig M Crews
Journal:  Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 13.820

9.  Development of Selective Histone Deacetylase 6 (HDAC6) Degraders Recruiting Von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) E3 Ubiquitin Ligase.

Authors:  Ka Yang; Hao Wu; Zhongrui Zhang; Eric D Leisten; Xueqing Nie; Binkai Liu; Zhi Wen; Jing Zhang; Michael D Cunningham; Weiping Tang
Journal:  ACS Med Chem Lett       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 4.345

10.  Small-molecule inhibitors of the interaction between the E3 ligase VHL and HIF1α.

Authors:  Dennis L Buckley; Jeffrey L Gustafson; Inge Van Molle; Anke G Roth; Hyun Seop Tae; Peter C Gareiss; William L Jorgensen; Alessio Ciulli; Craig M Crews
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2012-10-12       Impact factor: 15.336

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.