Literature DB >> 22369616

A special issue on DNA damage response and genome stability.

Guo-Min Li1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 22369616      PMCID: PMC3315426          DOI: 10.1186/2045-3701-2-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Biosci        ISSN: 2045-3701            Impact factor:   7.133


× No keyword cloud information.

The fidelity of the genome is under constant threat by exogenous and endogenous reactive species, including toxic chemicals, ionizing radiation and byproducts of normal cellular metabolism. These species cause damage to DNA by modifying DNA bases, breaking DNA strands and/or altering DNA structures. When this happens, the consequences to the cell can be disastrous, ranging from single gene mutations to massive chromosomal breakdown and rearrangements. These instabilities lead to severe human diseases including cancer. Fortunately, humans and other eukaryotes have evolved multiple mechanisms to ensure genome stability. These mechanisms can be classified into two major systems, one that deals with replication fidelity and the other that takes care of various DNA lesions. The replication fidelity maintenance system involves DNA polymerases and the DNA mismatch repair pathway. First, the 3'-5' proofreading nuclease activity of replicative DNA polymerases is responsible for removing the majority of mis-incorporated nucleotides during DNA replication [1]. However, there are always cases where certain mis-incorporations escape from the proofreading activity. In the latter situation, the mismatch repair machinery [2] is recruited to the site to correct the mismatch. If a DNA template contains a bulky DNA adduct that blocks the polymerization activity of replicative polymerases, a specialized DNA polymerase, also called translesion synthesis polymerase, is employed to bypass the bulky DNA lesion, followed by a switch back to the replicative polymerase to continue normal replication [3]. The DNA damage processing system can be divided into two steps: DNA damage response and DNA repair. Extensive studies in the past 20 years have elucidated the mechanisms of several major DNA repair pathways that remove almost all kinds of DNA lesions. These pathways include base excision repair [4], nucleotide excision repair [5,6], mismatch repair [2] and double strand break repair [7,8]. DNA damage response is a complex signal transduction process that has the ability to sense DNA damage and transduce the information to the cell to direct cellular responses to the damage. An arsenal of protein activities has been identified, which function to be damage sensors, mediators, transducers and effectors during DNA damage response [9]. Unlike the DNA repair pathways, however, the mechanism of DNA damage response is much less known. In this issue, Cell & Bioscience presents a series of reviews attempting to define the most challenging questions in DNA damage response and repair, and to provide an overview of the latest breakthroughs and developments in the field. The article by Nan Wu and Hongtao Yu [10] explores the mechanism by which the structural maintenance of chromosomes (Smc) proteins and non-Smc proteins, which are required for chromatid cohesion, chromosomal segregation and condensation, regulate DNA damage response and repair. A second article by Bin Wang [11] describes how BRCA1, an important tumor suppressor and a critical DNA damage response mediator, interacts with its partners to regulate activities of multiple repair and checkpoint pathways for genome maintenance. Maintaining the stability of repetitive DNA sequences, particularly the (CAG)n and (CTG)n trinucleotide repeats, whose expansions cause numerous human disorders, is extremely challenging, as is the understanding of the mechanisms that regulate the stability/instability of the repetitive sequences. In their article, Guoqi Liu and Michael Leffak [12] debate how collaborative efforts by the replication machinery and multiple DNA repair pathways stabilize (CAG)n and (CTG)n trinucleotide repeats. It is our sincere hope that this special issue brings our readers enlightenment and offers sufficient introductory information to help them appreciate new breakthroughs in the field.
  12 in total

Review 1.  Homologous recombination in DNA repair and DNA damage tolerance.

Authors:  Xuan Li; Wolf-Dietrich Heyer
Journal:  Cell Res       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 25.617

Review 2.  The fidelity of DNA synthesis by eukaryotic replicative and translesion synthesis polymerases.

Authors:  Scott D McCulloch; Thomas A Kunkel
Journal:  Cell Res       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 25.617

Review 3.  The endless tale of non-homologous end-joining.

Authors:  Eric Weterings; David J Chen
Journal:  Cell Res       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 25.617

Review 4.  Mechanisms and functions of DNA mismatch repair.

Authors:  Guo-Min Li
Journal:  Cell Res       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 25.617

Review 5.  DNA polymerases and cancer.

Authors:  Sabine S Lange; Kei-ichi Takata; Richard D Wood
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 6.  Transcription-coupled nucleotide excision repair in mammalian cells: molecular mechanisms and biological effects.

Authors:  Maria Fousteri; Leon H F Mullenders
Journal:  Cell Res       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 25.617

Review 7.  Eukaryotic nucleotide excision repair: from understanding mechanisms to influencing biology.

Authors:  Sarah C Shuck; Emily A Short; John J Turchi
Journal:  Cell Res       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 25.617

Review 8.  Early steps in the DNA base excision/single-strand interruption repair pathway in mammalian cells.

Authors:  Muralidhar L Hegde; Tapas K Hazra; Sankar Mitra
Journal:  Cell Res       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 25.617

9.  The Smc complexes in DNA damage response.

Authors:  Nan Wu; Hongtao Yu
Journal:  Cell Biosci       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 7.133

10.  BRCA1 tumor suppressor network: focusing on its tail.

Authors:  Bin Wang
Journal:  Cell Biosci       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 7.133

View more
  4 in total

1.  XRCC1 Arg399Gln variation and leukemia susceptibility: evidence from 2,647 cases and 5,518 controls.

Authors:  Yi Huang; Denghai Xie; Nana Tang; Jishi Wang; Xiaoqing Zeng; Peng Zhao; Ling He
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2013-08-30

2.  XRCC1 Arg280His polymorphism and glioma risk: A meta-analysis involving 1439 cases and 2564 controls.

Authors:  Liang Zhang; Yan Wang; Zhiqun Qiu; Jiaohua Luo; Ziyuan Zhou; Weiqun Shu
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.088

3.  X-ray repair cross-complementing gene 1 Arg399Gln polymorphism and glioma risk among Asians: A meta-analysis based on 2 326 cases and 3 610 controls.

Authors:  Liang Zhang; Zhiqun Qiu; Jiaohua Luo; Weiqun Shu
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 5.135

4.  The XRCC1 Arg194Trp polymorphism is not a risk factor for glioma: A meta-analysis involving 1,440 cases and 2,562 controls.

Authors:  Liang Zhang; Yan Wang; Zhiqun Qiu; Jiaohua Luo; Ziyuan Zhou; Weiqun Shu
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2012-09-18       Impact factor: 2.447

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.