Mycobacterium tuberculosis glutamine synthetase (MtGS) is a promising target for antituberculosis drug discovery. In a recent high-throughput screening study we identified several classes of MtGS inhibitors targeting the ATP-binding site. We now explore one of these classes, the 2-tert-butyl-4,5-diarylimidazoles, and present the design, synthesis, and X-ray crystallographic studies leading to the identification of MtGS inhibitors with submicromolar IC(50) values and promising antituberculosis MIC values.
Mycobacterium tuberculosis glutamine synthetase (MtGS) is a promising target for antituberculosis drug discovery. In a recent high-throughput screening study we identified several classes of MtGS inhibitors targeting the ATP-binding site. We now explore one of these classes, the 2-tert-butyl-4,5-diarylimidazoles, and present the design, synthesis, and X-ray crystallographic studies leading to the identification of MtGS inhibitors with submicromolar IC(50) values and promising antituberculosis MIC values.
Mycobacterium tuberculosis, the causative agent of tuberculosis, is one of the world’s
most deadly pathogens, leading to almost 1.7 million deaths annually
despite more than 100 years of research.[1] Rapidly emerging drug-resistant and multidrug-resistant strains
have provided additional impetus to the search for new therapeutic
agents to combat the disease.[2,3]M. tuberculosis glutamine synthetase (MtGS, EC 6.3.1.2) catalyzes
the conversion of glutamate, ammonia, and ATP to glutamine, phosphate,
and ADP.[4]MtGS plays a
key role in controlling the ammonia levels within infected host cells
and so contributes to the pathogen’s capacity to inhibit phagosome
acidification and phagosome–lysosome fusion.[5,6] Furthermore, MtGS is believed to be involved in cell wall biosynthesis;
it is found extracellularly in large quantities, which is related
to a role in the production of the poly-l-glutamate–glutamine
that is a major component of the cell wall in pathogenic mycobacteria.[7] Treatment of M. tuberculosis with antisense oligonucleotides to GS mRNA[8] or with the GS inhibitor l-methionine-S-sulfoximine (MSO, 1, Figure 1a)[9] inhibits biosynthesis of poly-l-glutamate–glutamine and the bacterial growth.[8,9] Compound 1 also shows in vivo efficacy in a guinea
pig model, suggesting GS as a promising and druggable target in the
treatment of M. tuberculosis.[10] The structure of MtGS incubated with 1, which is phosphorylated in situ to form the transition-state
analogue l-methionine-S-sulfoximine phosphate
(MSO-P, 2, Figure 1a), has been
reported showing how the inhibitor interacts in the amino acid binding
site.[11]
Figure 1
(a) Reference GS inhibitor 1 and
phosphorylated transition-state analogue 2. These two
compounds bind to the amino acid-binding site of MtGS. (b) Common scaffold of the HTS hits of cluster 2. (c, d) Two
most potent compounds from cluster 2 in the HTS study. Compounds 3 and 7a interact with the ATP-binding site of MtGS.[12]
In the present study we explore
a new class of MtGS inhibitors derived from a recent
high throughput screening (HTS) study.[12,13] This screen
targeted the ATP-binding site of MtGS with the goal
of moving away from the amino acid binding site,[14] which is largely conserved in humanGS. The 2-tert-butyl-4-aryl-5-pyridylimidazole motif was the common structure in
the hits assigned to cluster 2, with the 4-position substituted with
various aryl groups (Figure 1b). From more
than 20 compounds in this class, the two best were chosen for further
SAR studies (3 and 7a in Figure 1c,d).(a) Reference GS inhibitor 1 and
phosphorylated transition-state analogue 2. These two
compounds bind to the amino acid-binding site of MtGS. (b) Common scaffold of the HTS hits of cluster 2. (c, d) Two
most potent compounds from cluster 2 in the HTS study. Compounds 3 and 7a interact with the ATP-binding site of MtGS.[12]
Results and Discussion
We first sought a synthetic
route to the two most active HTS hits in order to resynthesize them,
confirm their activity, and initiate X-ray crystallographic studies.
This proved to be problematic; despite exploration of various synthetic
routes, we were never able to resynthesize 3. However,
the trisubstitutedimidazole 7a could be readily synthesized
and was therefore used in the hit expansion of this cluster. The synthesis
started from 2-bromo-6-methoxynaphthalene (4) with two
consecutive Sonogashira couplings followed by an oxidation and cyclization
to form the imidazole ring (see Scheme 1).
The ethyne was introduced by a fast microwave assisted[15] Sonogashira method[16,17] using ethynyltrimethylsilane,
dichlorobis(triphenylphosphine)palladium, copper iodide, and acetonitrile/diethylamine
(1:1) as solvent. In situ deprotection
with saturated K2CO3 in methanol gave the 2-ethynyl-6-methoxynapthalene
(5) in 85% yield. By use of the same protocol, the 4-pyridyl
moiety was incorporated in moderate yield (6a, 47%).
Oxidation of the ethyne 6a to the diketone intermediate
with potassium permanganate[18] in aqueous
acetone proved to be a very sensitive reaction and often led to oxidative
cleavage of the triple bond. Changing the standard buffer system NaHCO3/MgSO4 to NaH2PO4/Na2HPO4, and thus lowering the pH from 7.5 to 5, provided
a more robust protocol to furnish the diketone. In our attempts to
prepare 3, the identical oxidation conditions with the
corresponding quinoline intermediate only gave overoxidation, and
no conditions were identified that suppressed oxidative cleavage.
Finally the imidazole ring was synthesized by in situ trapping of
the diketone with various aldehydes and ammonium acetate allowing
straightforward variation of the tert-butyl group
position (R2). The resynthesized HTS hit 7a had IC50 = 3.1 μM, which is 30-fold higher than the IC50 obtained in the HTS study (0.1 μM), due to our more
stringent assay conditions.[12] Unfortunately,
neither 3 (from the AstraZeneca library) nor the resynthesized 7a was active in the mycobacterial growth assay (MIC >
32 μg/mL).
Scheme 1
Synthetic Route to Compounds 7a–m
Reagents and conditions:
(a) ethynyltrimethylsilane, Pd(PPh3)2Cl2, CuI, MeCN, diethylamine, microwave 120 °C, 15 min,
then K2CO3, MeOH, rt, 2 h, 85%; (b) bromoaryl/heteroaryl,
Pd(PPh3)2Cl2, CuI, MeCN, diethylamine,
microwave 80–120 °C, 15 min, 22–63%; (c) KMnO4, phosphate buffer; (d) aldehyde, ammonium acetate, n-butanol, 50–65 °C, 0.5–5 h, 10–63%.
Synthetic Route to Compounds 7a–m
Reagents and conditions:
(a) ethynyltrimethylsilane, Pd(PPh3)2Cl2, CuI, MeCN, diethylamine, microwave 120 °C, 15 min,
then K2CO3, MeOH, rt, 2 h, 85%; (b) bromoaryl/heteroaryl,
Pd(PPh3)2Cl2, CuI, MeCN, diethylamine,
microwave 80–120 °C, 15 min, 22–63%; (c) KMnO4, phosphate buffer; (d) aldehyde, ammonium acetate, n-butanol, 50–65 °C, 0.5–5 h, 10–63%.Since numerous 4-substituted arylimidazoles of 7a (Figure 1) had already been identified
and evaluated in the HTS study, we focused instead on optimizing positions
2 (the tert-butyl group) and 5 (the 4-pyridyl group).
The importance of the position of the nitrogen in the 4-pyridyl ring
was first examined by synthesizing the phenyl and pyrimidine analogues
(Table 1, 7b–d). The same synthetic strategy as described above was applied, replacing
the 4-pyridyl with aryl/heteroaryl groups introduced in the second
Sonogashira reaction. Cyclization with pivalaldehyde gave the targets 7b–d in which the nitrogen was either
removed (7b) or its position altered (7c–d). The results clearly indicate the importance
of having a nitrogen in the 4-position of the pyridine ring; all compounds
lacking this feature were inactive (IC50 > 25 μM).
Table 1
Activities of Trisubstituted Imidazoles
To investigate the importance of steric bulk in position 2 of the
imidazole ring, compounds with smaller alkyl chains were synthesized.
Cyclizing the diketone with propionaldehyde, acetaldehyde, and formaldehyde
gave ethyl, methyl, and hydrogen, respectively, at position 2 of the
imidazole ring (7e–g in Table 1). Removal of two methyl groups generated a slightly
more active compound (7e, 2.2 μM vs 7a, 3.1 μM). Removal of yet another methyl group yielded 7f, which was inactive. Likewise, complete removal of the tert-butyl group gave the inactive 7g. Clearly,
there is a preference for relatively bulky substituents in this position.Parallel studies at this point produced the structure of MtGS in complex with 2, 3 (obtained
from AstraZeneca’s in-house compound library), phosphate, and
magnesium at 2.15 Å resolution (crystallographic R-factor 22.5%, Figure 2a). An overlay of this
structure on that of the complex with 2, ADP, and magnesium
(PDB entry 2BVC)[11] is shown in Figure 2b; an rmsd of 0.2 Å is obtained when the Cα's of
residues 4–478 in the A chains are compared. Compound 2 occupies exactly the same position in the amino acid binding
site in each case; all three of the metal ions are also in equivalent
locations. The 4-pyridyl moiety of 3 is at essentially
the same place as the six-membered pyrimidine ring of ADP, with the
inhibitor’s ring nitrogen providing the only hydrogen bond
to protein (via the side chain of Ser280) in an interaction equivalent
to that of N1 of ADP’s adenine ring. The interaction with this
serine explains why a nitrogen at the 4-position of the pyridine ring
is so important for binding affinity (vide supra). The imidazole ring
and tert-butyl moieties of 3 occupy
roughly the same space as the ribose of the nucleotide. Thus, the
R2 group is found at the end of the ribose proximal to
its linkage with the phosphates. A phosphate ion assumes the position
of the β-phosphate of ADP. The quinoline moiety extends out
toward the solvent, making van der Waals interactions with the protein
only near Ala362 (not shown). Correspondingly, the electron density
of this group is poorer than that of the rest of the ligand, although
density in the maps averaged over all six subunits is clear (see Supporting Information). Efforts to cocrystallize 7a with MtGS were unsuccessful. However,
we hypothesize that the binding modes of 3 and 7a are very similar, which is supported by our docking studies.
The comparisons in Figure 2b led us to make 7i; docking studies indicated that the hydroxyl group of this
compound could occupy the same position as O3′ of ADP and form
an equivalent hydrogen bond to the backbone carbonyl of Tyr230 (Figure 2b). In the original synthetic route to 7i, the hydroxyl was benzyl protected (7h) to ease the
synthesis. However, all attempts to deprotect the corresponding alcohol
by hydrogenation or oxidative protocols were unsuccessful. Compound 7h was evaluated in the MtGS assay but did
not show any inhibitory activity at 25 μM. An alternative protective
group strategy was then employed in which 2-(tert-butyldimethylsilyloxy)acetaldehyde was instead used in the imidazole
ring cyclization. The silyloxy group allowed smooth deprotection with
tetrabutylammonium fluoride to yield 7i. Disappointingly, 7i was also inactive in the enzymatic assay. The remaining
compounds (7j–m) in Table 1 were similarly suggested to reach into the sugar-binding
site of the ATP pocket. In the final step of the synthesis leading
up to these compounds, aldehydes are used as reagents (see Scheme 1). We therefore created a set of virtual compounds
by merging aldehydes found in-house and in the ACD database, using
the Legion software.[19] The compounds were
then docked to the nucleotide-binding site using Glide, and the fit
was evaluated based on the Glide score and visual inspection. Despite
their promising docking poses, 7j–m all lacked inhibitory activity at 25 μM.
Figure 2
(a) MtGS (yellow carbons) in complex with 2 (MSO-P), 3 (gray carbons), phosphate, and magnesium. Hydrogen bond
between 3 and Ser280 is shown as a black dashed line.
Nearby magnesium ions are green spheres. (b) Superposition of the MtGS structure with 3 on that with bound ADP
(PDB entry 2BVC) allows comparison to nucleotide (pink carbons) binding. Protein/ADP
hydrogen bonds are pink dashed lines.
(a) MtGS (yellow carbons) in complex with 2 (MSO-P), 3 (gray carbons), phosphate, and magnesium. Hydrogen bond
between 3 and Ser280 is shown as a black dashed line.
Nearby magnesium ions are green spheres. (b) Superposition of the MtGS structure with 3 on that with bound ADP
(PDB entry 2BVC) allows comparison to nucleotide (pink carbons) binding. Protein/ADPhydrogen bonds are pink dashed lines.
Synthetic Route to Compounds 11a–d
Reagents and conditions:
(a) EtOH, Pd(OAc)2, Xantphos, DBU, Mo(CO)6,
microwave 120 °C, 30 min, 93%; (b) 2-fluoro-4-methylpyridine,
NaHMDS, THF, 0 °C, 2 h, 64%; (c) HBr, DMSO, 70 °C, 2 h,
then pivalaldehyde, ammonium acetate, n-butanol,
50 °C, 2 h, 71%. (d) 11a: (i) diphenylmethanamine,
dioxane, microwave 200 °C, 10 h, (ii) Pd/C, NH4OAc,
MeOH, microwave 120–140 °C, 2 h, 28%. 11b: methylamine (2.0 M in THF), microwave 150 °C, 17 h, 18%. 11c: ammonium hydroxide, DMF, microwave 150 °C, 12 h,
85%. 11d: AcOH, H2O, microwave 190 °C,
2 h, 91%.Going back to the superimposed X-ray
structures, we decided to substitute the 4-pyridyl group of 7a with a 2-aminopyridine-4-yl, which would possibly allow
the formation of a hydrogen bond to the backbone carbonyl oxygen of
Lys361, similar to the interaction seen for N6 of ADP (Figure 2b). Another synthetic approach was employed in the
synthesis of the aminopyridines 11a–d, avoiding the sensitive oxidation of the triple bond (Scheme 2). Ethyl 6-methoxy-2-naphthoate
(8) was synthesized in 93% yield by a palladium-catalyzed
carbonylation of 2-bromo-6-methoxynaphthalene (4) utilizing
ethanol as the nucleophile.[20] In the next
step, the fluorine of 2-fluoro-4-methylpyridine was incorporated as
a handle to allow nucleophilic aromatic substitutions in later steps.
Compound 9 was produced in acceptable yield (64%) by
deprotonation of 2-fluoro-4-methylpyridine with NaHMDS via nucleophilic
substitution of 8. As an alternative to creating the
imidazole ring from the diketone, an α-bromination was performed
on 9 followed by cyclization with ammonium acetate and
pivalaldehyde. Attempts to resynthesize the HTS hit 3 by this route again failed because we were never able to substitute
the ethoxy of ethyl quinoline-3-carboxylate with 4-methylpyridine.
At this point, it was encouraging to see that the fluorine in 10 contributed to an approximate 2.5-fold increase of affinity
compared to the hit 7a (IC50 of 1.2 μM
vs 3.1 μM, Table 1). The aminopyridine 11a was synthesized via microwave-assisted nucleophilic substitution
of the fluorine of 10 with diphenylmethanamine followed
by deprotection through catalytic hydrogenation. Remarkably, 11a was over 60 times better than the reference 7a (0.049 μM vs 3.1 μM, Table 1),
suggesting an important new interaction with the enzyme. For comparison,
the methylamino and the dimethylamino groups were incorporated in
a similar way. Compound 11b, having one methyl group,
showed a 100-fold loss in activity compared to 11a, making
it even less potent than 7a. Substituting the fluorine
with a dimethylamino group resulted in 11c, which was
inactive. This suggested that having a hydrogen bond donating group
in the 2-position of the pyridine ring was advantageous. As an alternative
donating group, we introduced the 2-pyridone ring (11d), which we believed would bind in its 2-hydroxy tautomer. However,
on the basis of the lack of activity of this compound, one can speculate
that it predominantly exists in the pyridone form.
Scheme 2
Synthetic Route to Compounds 11a–d
Reagents and conditions:
(a) EtOH, Pd(OAc)2, Xantphos, DBU, Mo(CO)6,
microwave 120 °C, 30 min, 93%; (b) 2-fluoro-4-methylpyridine,
NaHMDS, THF, 0 °C, 2 h, 64%; (c) HBr, DMSO, 70 °C, 2 h,
then pivalaldehyde, ammonium acetate, n-butanol,
50 °C, 2 h, 71%. (d) 11a: (i) diphenylmethanamine,
dioxane, microwave 200 °C, 10 h, (ii) Pd/C, NH4OAc,
MeOH, microwave 120–140 °C, 2 h, 28%. 11b: methylamine (2.0 M in THF), microwave 150 °C, 17 h, 18%. 11c: ammonium hydroxide, DMF, microwave 150 °C, 12 h,
85%. 11d: AcOH, H2O, microwave 190 °C,
2 h, 91%.
(a) MtGS (yellow carbons) in complex with 2, 11a (cyan carbons), phosphate, and magnesium. Hydrogen bonds are shown
as cyan dashed lines. (b) Superposition of the protein allows comparison
of binding of 3 (gray carbons) and 11a.At this time, we succeeded in obtaining a crystal
structure of 11a bound to MtGS together
with 2, phosphate, and magnesium at 2.26 Å resolution
(R-factor 19.5%, Figure 3a).
The complexes with 3 and 11a are overlaid
in Figure 3b; again, the protein structures
are highly similar, with an rmsd of only 0.1 Å when the Cα's
of residues 4–478 are compared. Ser280 of MtGS was seen to interact with both nitrogens of the 2-aminopyridine-4-yl
moiety of 11a (only the hydrogen bond with the ring nitrogen
was present in the complex with 3), which shifts the
ligand ∼0.5 Å deeper into the binding site. Inspection
of the 11a complex indicates that the distance is too
great (∼3.5 Å) to support a hydrogen bond between the
2-amino group and the backbone carbonyl oxygen of Lys361. Apart from
very small changes at the side chain of Phe232 and the main chain
near residue Ala362, the protein structures are essentially identical.
The compounds that inhibited MtGS were also evaluated
for their activity against the M. tuberculosis strain
H37Rv. The hit 7a and 7e lacked antibacterial
activity (MIC > 32 μg/mL), while the 2-pyridyl substituted
compounds had promising MIC values; the most potent compound as measured
by the enzymatic inhibition, 11a, also gave the best
MIC (2 μg/mL; see Table 1). To assess
the potential cytotoxicity of 11a, we performed a standard
mammalian cell proliferation assay[22] using
A549 cells; 11a had an IC50 of 24.7 μm
in this test, which is almost 5-fold greater than the MIC of 5.4 μM
(2 μg/mL). This moderate level of cytotoxicity is not unusual
among compounds in the early stages of drug development, and the situation
is expected to improve as more effective enzyme inhibition and antibacterial
activity are attained.
Figure 3
(a) MtGS (yellow carbons) in complex with 2, 11a (cyan carbons), phosphate, and magnesium. Hydrogen bonds are shown
as cyan dashed lines. (b) Superposition of the protein allows comparison
of binding of 3 (gray carbons) and 11a.
Conclusions
A recent HTS study targeting the ATP-binding
site of MtGS produced several active classes of compounds.
One of these, the 2-tert-butyl-4,5-diarylimidazoles,
contained several hits, and a complex with one of the inhibitors with MtGS could be obtained by X-ray crystallography. On the
basis of this structure, our initial SAR explorations could be rationalized
as well as the importance of having a nitrogen, acting as a hydrogen
bond acceptor, in the 4-position of the pyridine ring. Building out
from the tert-butyl group, a series of compounds
was designed to reach into the ribose-binding site of the ATP pocket.
However, these compounds lacked inhibitory activity at 25 μM.
An alternative synthetic strategy in which a 2-amino group was introduced
into the 4-pyridyl ring was then pursued. This gave us our best inhibitor
(11a) with IC50 = 0.049 μM on MtGS and an MIC = 2 μg/mL against M. tuberculosis. We were also able to obtain an X-ray structure of this compound
bound to MtGS, which showed that instead of forming
a hydrogen bond to the backbone carbonyl oxygen of Lys361 as predicted
from docking studies, the 2-amino group formed an additional interaction
with the hydroxyloxygen of Ser280 in its primary binding mode.
Experimental Procedures
General Methods
Microwave-assisted reactions were performed
in sealed vials dedicated for microwave processing, using a Smith
synthesizer. NMR spectra were recorded on a Varian Mercury Plus for 1H at 399.9 MHz and for 13C NMR at 100.5 MHz. Analytical
HPLC–UV/MS analysis of pure products were performed on a Gilson
HPLC system with a Chromolith SpeedROD RP-18e column (50 mm ×
4.6 mm) equipped with a Finnigan AQA quadrupole mass spectrometer
using a 4 mL/min CH3CN/H2O gradient (0.05% HCOOH)
and detection by UV (DAD) and MS (ESI+). All compounds were determined
to be >95% pure by HPLC–UV at 254 nm.
To a microwave vial (2–5 mL) were added 10 (50
mg, 0.13 mmol), diphenylmethanamine (1.5 mL), and dioxane (1.5 mL).
The vial was then sealed under air and heated at 200 °C by microwave
irradiation for 10 h. After cooling, the mixture was filtered through
a plug of silica, eluted with EtOAc/isohexane (1:1) and the filtrate
concentrated in vacuo. The crude mixture was then taken up in MeOH
(2.0 mL) and transferred to a microwave vial (2–5 mL) loaded
with Pd/C (10%, 5 mg) and ammonium acetate (100 mg, 1.3 mmol). The
vial was then sealed under air and heated at 120 °C by microwave
irradiation for 2 h. After the mixture was cooled, Pd/C (10%, 10 mg)
and ammonium acetate (200 mg, 2.6 mmol) were added, and the mixture
was heated by microwave irradiation for a further 20 min at 140 °C.
After cooling, the mixture was diluted with EtOAc and saturated NaHCO3 (10 mL each) and the two layers were separated. The aqueous
layer was washed twice with EtOAc (10 mL), and the combined organic
phases were concentrated in vacuo. The crude product was thereafter
purified by silica column flash chromatography, eluting with EtOAc/methanol/triethylamine
(1:0.05:0.01). Yield: 28%, 14 mg as a pale yellow solid. 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 7.81 (d, J = 1.9
Hz, 1H), 7.72 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 1H), 7.69 (m, 1H),
7.51 (dm, J = 6.1 Hz, 1H), 7.40 (dd, J = 8.6, 1.9 Hz, 1H), 7.16 (m, 1H), 7.14 (m, 1H), 6.91 (br s, 1H),
6.65 (dm, J = 6.1 Hz, 1H), 3.91 (s, 3H), 1.43, (s,
9H); 13C NMR (CDCl3/CD3OD, 5:1) δ
170.3, 158.6, 157.4, 156.9, 146.6, 140.5, 134.5, 129.7, 128.9, 127.8,
127.6, 127.2, 126.4, 119.8, 111.7, 107.5, 106.0, 55.6, 33.2, 29.6
(one carbon signal was not detected).[21] ESI-MS (m/z) 373 (M + H+). HRMS (M + H+): 373.2037, C23H24N4O requires 373.2028.
Authors: Johan Wannberg; Yogesh A Sabnis; Lotta Vrang; Bertil Samuelsson; Anders Karlén; Anders Hallberg; Mats Larhed Journal: Bioorg Med Chem Date: 2006-04-18 Impact factor: 3.641
Authors: Anneli Nordqvist; Mikael T Nilsson; Svenja Röttger; Luke R Odell; Wojciech W Krajewski; C Evalena Andersson; Mats Larhed; Sherry L Mowbray; Anders Karlén Journal: Bioorg Med Chem Date: 2008-04-11 Impact factor: 3.641
Authors: Luke R Odell; Mikael T Nilsson; Johan Gising; Olof Lagerlund; Daniel Muthas; Anneli Nordqvist; Anders Karlén; Mats Larhed Journal: Bioorg Med Chem Lett Date: 2009-06-14 Impact factor: 2.823
Authors: Mikael T Nilsson; Wojciech W Krajewski; Sujan Yellagunda; Savitha Prabhumurthy; Gayathri N Chamarahally; Chandrasekharan Siddamadappa; Bachally R Srinivasa; Samir Yahiaoui; Mats Larhed; Anders Karlén; T Alwyn Jones; Sherry L Mowbray Journal: J Mol Biol Date: 2009-08-18 Impact factor: 5.469
Authors: G B Migliori; C Lange; R Centis; G Sotgiu; R Mütterlein; H Hoffmann; K Kliiman; G De Iaco; F N Lauria; M D Richardson; A Spanevello; D M Cirillo Journal: Eur Respir J Date: 2008-06 Impact factor: 16.671
Authors: Zhe Wang; Vijay Soni; Gwendolyn Marriner; Takushi Kaneko; Helena I M Boshoff; Clifton E Barry; Kyu Y Rhee Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2019-09-09 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: A Theron; R L Roth; H Hoppe; C Parkinson; C W van der Westhuyzen; S Stoychev; I Wiid; R D Pietersen; B Baker; C P Kenyon Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-10-03 Impact factor: 3.240