Literature DB >> 22367858

Computer-aided quantitative bone scan assessment of prostate cancer treatment response.

Matthew S Brown1, Gregory H Chu, Hyun J Kim, Martin Allen-Auerbach, Cheryce Poon, Juliette Bridges, Adria Vidovic, Bharath Ramakrishna, Judy Ho, Michael J Morris, Steven M Larson, Howard I Scher, Jonathan G Goldin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The development and evaluation of a computer-aided bone scan analysis technique to quantify changes in tumor burden and assess treatment effects in prostate cancer clinical trials.
METHODS: We have developed and report on a commercial fully automated computer-aided detection (CAD) system. Using this system, scan images were intensity normalized, and then lesions were identified and segmented by anatomic region-specific intensity thresholding. Detected lesions were compared against expert markings to assess the accuracy of the CAD system. The metrics Bone Scan Lesion Area, Bone Scan Lesion Intensity, and Bone Scan Lesion Count were calculated from identified lesions, and their utility in assessing treatment effects was evaluated by analyzing before and after scans from metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients: 10 treated and 10 untreated. In this study, patients were treated with cabozantinib, a MET/vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitor resulting in high rates of resolution of bone scan abnormalities.
RESULTS: Our automated CAD system identified bone lesion pixels with 94% sensitivity, 89% specificity, and 89% accuracy. Significant differences in changes from baseline were found between treated and untreated groups in all assessed measurements derived by our system. The most significant measure, Bone Scan Lesion Area, showed a median (interquartile range) change from baseline at week 6 of 7.13% (27.61) in the untreated group compared with -73.76% (45.38) in the cabozantinib-treated group (P=0.0003).
CONCLUSION: Our system accurately and objectively identified and quantified metastases in bone scans, allowing for interpatient and intrapatient comparison. It demonstrates potential as an objective measurement of treatment effects, laying the foundation for validation against other clinically relevant outcome measures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22367858      PMCID: PMC3294499          DOI: 10.1097/MNM.0b013e3283503ebf

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucl Med Commun        ISSN: 0143-3636            Impact factor:   1.690


  22 in total

1.  PET-CT image registration in the chest using free-form deformations.

Authors:  David Mattes; David R Haynor; Hubert Vesselle; Thomas K Lewellen; William Eubank
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Phase II study of abiraterone acetate in chemotherapy-naive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer displaying bone flare discordant with serologic response.

Authors:  Charles J Ryan; Shreya Shah; Eleni Efstathiou; Matthew R Smith; Mary-Ellen Taplin; Glenn J Bubley; Christopher J Logothetis; Thian Kheoh; Christine Kilian; Christopher M Haqq; Arturo Molina; Eric J Small
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 12.531

3.  VEGF and c-Met blockade amplify angiogenesis inhibition in pancreatic islet cancer.

Authors:  Weon-Kyoo You; Barbara Sennino; Casey W Williamson; Beverly Falcón; Hiroya Hashizume; Li-Chin Yao; Dana T Aftab; Donald M McDonald
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 4.  Metastatic bone disease: clinical features, pathophysiology and treatment strategies.

Authors:  R E Coleman
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 12.111

5.  The association between radiographic response and overall survival in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer receiving chemotherapy.

Authors:  Guru Sonpavde; Gregory R Pond; William R Berry; Ronald de Wit; Mario A Eisenberger; Ian F Tannock; Andrew J Armstrong
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 6.  The natural history, skeletal complications, and management of bone metastases in patients with prostate carcinoma.

Authors:  B I Carlin; G L Andriole
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2000-06-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Comparison of image enhancement methods for the effective diagnosis in successive whole-body bone scans.

Authors:  Chang Bu Jeong; Kwang Gi Kim; Tae Sung Kim; Seok Ki Kim
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 8.  Understanding the biology of bone metastases: key to the effective treatment of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Christopher J Logothetis; Nora M Navone; Sue-Hwa Lin
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2008-03-15       Impact factor: 12.531

9.  Quality of planar whole-body bone scan interpretations--a nationwide survey.

Authors:  May Sadik; Madis Suurkula; Peter Höglund; Andreas Järund; Lars Edenbrandt
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2008-03-29       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 10.  Percentage of the positive area of bone metastasis is an independent predictor of disease death in advanced prostate cancer.

Authors:  M Noguchi; H Kikuchi; M Ishibashi; S Noda
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2003-01-27       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  19 in total

1.  Analytic Validation of the Automated Bone Scan Index as an Imaging Biomarker to Standardize Quantitative Changes in Bone Scans of Patients with Metastatic Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Aseem Anand; Michael J Morris; Reza Kaboteh; Lena Båth; May Sadik; Peter Gjertsson; Milan Lomsky; Lars Edenbrandt; David Minarik; Anders Bjartell
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 10.057

2.  Cabozantinib, a New Standard of Care for Patients With Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma and Bone Metastases? Subgroup Analysis of the METEOR Trial.

Authors:  Bernard Escudier; Thomas Powles; Robert J Motzer; Thomas Olencki; Osvaldo Arén Frontera; Stephane Oudard; Frederic Rolland; Piotr Tomczak; Daniel Castellano; Leonard J Appleman; Harry Drabkin; Daniel Vaena; Steven Milwee; Jillian Youkstetter; Julie C Lougheed; Sergio Bracarda; Toni K Choueiri
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Trial Design and Objectives for Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: Updated Recommendations From the Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group 3.

Authors:  Howard I Scher; Michael J Morris; Walter M Stadler; Celestia Higano; Ethan Basch; Karim Fizazi; Emmanuel S Antonarakis; Tomasz M Beer; Michael A Carducci; Kim N Chi; Paul G Corn; Johann S de Bono; Robert Dreicer; Daniel J George; Elisabeth I Heath; Maha Hussain; Wm Kevin Kelly; Glenn Liu; Christopher Logothetis; David Nanus; Mark N Stein; Dana E Rathkopf; Susan F Slovin; Charles J Ryan; Oliver Sartor; Eric J Small; Matthew Raymond Smith; Cora N Sternberg; Mary-Ellen Taplin; George Wilding; Peter S Nelson; Lawrence H Schwartz; Susan Halabi; Philip W Kantoff; Andrew J Armstrong
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 4.  Circulating tumour cells-monitoring treatment response in prostate cancer.

Authors:  David T Miyamoto; Lecia V Sequist; Richard J Lee
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-05-13       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 5.  Prognostic Utility of PET in Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Hossein Jadvar
Journal:  PET Clin       Date:  2015-01-22

6.  Cabozantinib Versus Mitoxantrone-prednisone in Symptomatic Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer: A Randomized Phase 3 Trial with a Primary Pain Endpoint.

Authors:  Ethan M Basch; Mark Scholz; Johann S de Bono; Nicholas Vogelzang; Paul de Souza; Gavin Marx; Ulka Vaishampayan; Saby George; James K Schwarz; Emmanuel S Antonarakis; Joseph M O'Sullivan; Arash Rezazadeh Kalebasty; Kim N Chi; Robert Dreicer; Thomas E Hutson; Amylou C Dueck; Antonia V Bennett; Erica Dayan; Milan Mangeshkar; Jaymes Holland; Aaron L Weitzman; Howard I Scher
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 7.  Validation and clinical utility of prostate cancer biomarkers.

Authors:  Howard I Scher; Michael J Morris; Steven Larson; Glenn Heller
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 8.  Targeting MET and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor signaling in castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Authors:  Richard J Lee; Matthew R Smith
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.360

Review 9.  Controlling escape from angiogenesis inhibitors.

Authors:  Barbara Sennino; Donald M McDonald
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 60.716

10.  A dose-ranging study of cabozantinib in men with castration-resistant prostate cancer and bone metastases.

Authors:  Richard J Lee; Philip J Saylor; M Dror Michaelson; S Michael Rothenberg; Malgorzata E Smas; David T Miyamoto; Carol A Gurski; Wanling Xie; Shyamala Maheswaran; Daniel A Haber; Jonathan G Goldin; Matthew R Smith
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 12.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.