OBJECTIVE: In parts of the developing world traditionally modeled healthcare systems do not adequately meet the needs of the populace. This can be due to imbalances in both supply and demand--there may be a lack of sufficient healthcare and the population most at need may be unable or unwilling to take advantage of it. Home-based care has emerged as a possible mechanism to bring healthcare to the populace in a cost-effective, useful manner. This study describes the development, implementation, and evaluation of a mobile device-based system to support such services. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Mobile phones were utilized and a structured survey was implemented to be administered by community health workers using Open Data Kit. This system was used to support screening efforts for a population of two million persons in western Kenya. RESULTS: Users of the system felt it was easy to use and facilitated their work. The system was also more cost effective than pen and paper alternatives. DISCUSSION: This implementation is one of the largest applications of a system utilizing handheld devices for performing clinical care during home visits in a resource-constrained environment. Because the data were immediately available electronically, initial reports could be performed and important trends in data could thus be detected. This allowed adjustments to the programme to be made sooner than might have otherwise been possible. CONCLUSION: A viable, cost-effective solution at scale has been developed and implemented for collecting electronic data during household visits in a resource-constrained setting.
OBJECTIVE: In parts of the developing world traditionally modeled healthcare systems do not adequately meet the needs of the populace. This can be due to imbalances in both supply and demand--there may be a lack of sufficient healthcare and the population most at need may be unable or unwilling to take advantage of it. Home-based care has emerged as a possible mechanism to bring healthcare to the populace in a cost-effective, useful manner. This study describes the development, implementation, and evaluation of a mobile device-based system to support such services. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Mobile phones were utilized and a structured survey was implemented to be administered by community health workers using Open Data Kit. This system was used to support screening efforts for a population of two million persons in western Kenya. RESULTS: Users of the system felt it was easy to use and facilitated their work. The system was also more cost effective than pen and paper alternatives. DISCUSSION: This implementation is one of the largest applications of a system utilizing handheld devices for performing clinical care during home visits in a resource-constrained environment. Because the data were immediately available electronically, initial reports could be performed and important trends in data could thus be detected. This allowed adjustments to the programme to be made sooner than might have otherwise been possible. CONCLUSION: A viable, cost-effective solution at scale has been developed and implemented for collecting electronic data during household visits in a resource-constrained setting.
Authors: James M Galliher; Thomas V Stewart; Paramod K Pathak; James J Werner; L Miriam Dickinson; John M Hickner Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2008 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Martin C Were; James Kariuki; Viola Chepng'eno; Margaret Wandabwa; Samson Ndege; Paula Braitstein; Juddy Wachira; Sylvester Kimaiyo; Burke Mamlin Journal: Stud Health Technol Inform Date: 2010
Authors: Burke W Mamlin; Paul G Biondich; Ben A Wolfe; Hamish Fraser; Darius Jazayeri; Christian Allen; Justin Miranda; William M Tierney Journal: AMIA Annu Symp Proc Date: 2006
Authors: Thomas S Inui; Winston M Nyandiko; Sylvester N Kimaiyo; Richard M Frankel; Tadeo Muriuki; Joseph J Mamlin; Robert M Einterz; John E Sidle Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2007-10-31 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Barry Dwolatzky; Estelle Trengove; Helen Struthers; James A McIntyre; Neil A Martinson Journal: Int J Health Geogr Date: 2006-08-16 Impact factor: 3.918
Authors: Mengiste M Mesfin; James N Newell; John D Walley; Amanuel Gessessew; Richard J Madeley Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2009-02-09 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: John F Hurdle; Stephen C Haroldsen; Andrew Hammer; Cindy Spigle; Alison M Fraser; Geraldine P Mineau; Samir J Courdy Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2012-10-11 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Jennifer Mark; John Kinuthia; Alison C Roxby; Daisy Krakowiak; Alfred Osoti; Barbra A Richardson; Molly Ann Gone; Victor Asila; Saloni Parikh; Carey Farquhar Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2017-09 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Jennifer Mark; John Kinuthia; Alfred O Osoti; Molly A Gone; Victor Asila; Daisy Krakowiak; Monisha Sharma; Saloni Parikh; Quy T Ton; Barbra A Richardson; Carey Farquhar; Alison C Roxby Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2019-11 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Jennifer Dickman Portz; Anton Vehovec; Mary A Dolansky; Jennifer B Levin; Sheana Bull; Rebecca Boxer Journal: Telemed J E Health Date: 2017-07-12 Impact factor: 3.536
Authors: Ying Zhou; Neil F Lobo; Adam Wolkon; John E Gimnig; Alpha Malishee; Jennifer Stevenson; Frank H Collins; Greg Madey Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2014-07-21 Impact factor: 2.345
Authors: Thomas Gaziano; Shafika Abrahams-Gessel; Sam Surka; Stephen Sy; Ankur Pandya; Catalina A Denman; Carlos Mendoza; Thandi Puoane; Naomi S Levitt Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2015-09 Impact factor: 6.301