Literature DB >> 22365852

Bub1 kinase and Sgo1 modulate pericentric chromatin in response to altered microtubule dynamics.

Julian Haase1, Andrew Stephens, Jolien Verdaasdonk, Elaine Yeh, Kerry Bloom.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Tension sensing of bioriented chromosomes is essential for the fidelity of chromosome segregation. The spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) conveys lack of tension or attachment to the anaphase promoting complex. Components of the SAC (Bub1) phosphorylate histone H2A (S121) and recruit the protector of cohesin, Shugoshin (Sgo1), to the inner centromere. How the chromatin structural modifications of the inner centromere are integrated into the tension sensing mechanisms and the checkpoint are not known.
RESULTS: We have identified a Bub1/Sgo1-dependent structural change in the geometry and dynamics of kinetochores and the pericentric chromatin upon reduction of microtubule dynamics. The cluster of inner kinetochores contract, whereas the pericentric chromatin and cohesin that encircle spindle microtubules undergo a radial expansion. Despite its increased spatial distribution, the pericentric chromatin is less dynamic. The change in dynamics is due to histone H2A phosphorylation and Sgo1 recruitment to the pericentric chromatin, rather than microtubule dynamics.
CONCLUSIONS: Bub1 and Sgo1 act as a rheostat to regulate the chromatin spring and maintain force balance. Through histone H2A S121 phosphorylation and recruitment of Sgo1, Bub1 kinase softens the chromatin spring in response to changes in microtubule dynamics. The geometric alteration of all 16 kinetochores and pericentric chromatin reflect global changes in the pericentromeric region and provide mechanisms for mechanically amplifying damage at a single kinetochore microtubule. Copyright Â
© 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22365852      PMCID: PMC3311747          DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2012.02.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  41 in total

1.  Cohesins bind to preferential sites along yeast chromosome III, with differential regulation along arms versus the centric region.

Authors:  Y Blat; N Kleckner
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1999-07-23       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Microtubule-dependent changes in assembly of microtubule motor proteins and mitotic spindle checkpoint proteins at PtK1 kinetochores.

Authors:  D B Hoffman; C G Pearson; T J Yen; B J Howell; E D Salmon
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.138

Review 3.  Dynamic microtubules lead the way for spindle positioning.

Authors:  Chad G Pearson; Kerry Bloom
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 94.444

4.  The polarity and dynamics of microtubule assembly in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  P S Maddox; K S Bloom; E D Salmon
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 28.824

Review 5.  Force generation by microtubule assembly/disassembly in mitosis and related movements.

Authors:  S Inoué; E D Salmon
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 4.138

6.  Yeast kinetochores do not stabilize Stu2p-dependent spindle microtubule dynamics.

Authors:  Chad G Pearson; Paul S Maddox; Ted R Zarzar; E D Salmon; Kerry Bloom
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2003-07-25       Impact factor: 4.138

7.  Cohesin, condensin, and the intramolecular centromere loop together generate the mitotic chromatin spring.

Authors:  Andrew D Stephens; Julian Haase; Leandra Vicci; Russell M Taylor; Kerry Bloom
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2011-06-27       Impact factor: 10.539

8.  Pressure-induced depolymerization of spindle microtubules. III. Differential stability in HeLa cells.

Authors:  E D Salmon; D Goode; T K Maugel; D B Bonar
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1976-05       Impact factor: 10.539

9.  Budding yeast chromosome structure and dynamics during mitosis.

Authors:  C G Pearson; P S Maddox; E D Salmon; K Bloom
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2001-03-19       Impact factor: 10.539

10.  The kinetochore is an enhancer of pericentric cohesin binding.

Authors:  Stewart A Weber; Jennifer L Gerton; Joan E Polancic; Joseph L DeRisi; Douglas Koshland; Paul C Megee
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2004-07-27       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  35 in total

Review 1.  The composition, functions, and regulation of the budding yeast kinetochore.

Authors:  Sue Biggins
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Kinetochore function and chromosome segregation rely on critical residues in histones H3 and H4 in budding yeast.

Authors:  Tessie M Ng; Tineke L Lenstra; Nicole Duggan; Shuangying Jiang; Steven Ceto; Frank C P Holstege; Junbiao Dai; Jef D Boeke; Sue Biggins
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Distinct Roles of the Chromosomal Passenger Complex in the Detection of and Response to Errors in Kinetochore-Microtubule Attachment.

Authors:  Julian Haase; Mary Kate Bonner; Hyunmi Halas; Alexander E Kelly
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 12.270

4.  The SUMO deconjugating peptidase Smt4 contributes to the mechanism required for transition from sister chromatid arm cohesion to sister chromatid pericentromere separation.

Authors:  Andrew D Stephens; Chloe E Snider; Kerry Bloom
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 5.  Critical roles of Shugoshin and histones as tension sensors during mitosis.

Authors:  Christopher J Buehl; Min-Hao Kuo
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 3.886

Review 6.  Centromeric heterochromatin: the primordial segregation machine.

Authors:  Kerry S Bloom
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 16.830

7.  The regulation of chromosome segregation via centromere loops.

Authors:  Josh Lawrimore; Kerry Bloom
Journal:  Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 8.250

Review 8.  Functioning mechanisms of Shugoshin-1 in centromeric cohesion during mitosis.

Authors:  Qian Zhang; Hong Liu
Journal:  Essays Biochem       Date:  2020-09-04       Impact factor: 8.000

9.  Sgo1 recruits PP2A to chromosomes to ensure sister chromatid bi-orientation during mitosis.

Authors:  Heather D Eshleman; David O Morgan
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 5.285

10.  Identification of Tension Sensing Motif of Histone H3 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Its Regulation by Histone Modifying Enzymes.

Authors:  Jianjun Luo; Xiexiong Deng; Christopher Buehl; Xinjing Xu; Min-Hao Kuo
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.