Literature DB >> 22365552

Tuned normalization explains the size of attention modulations.

Amy M Ni1, Supratim Ray, John H R Maunsell.   

Abstract

The effect of attention on firing rates varies considerably within a single cortical area. The firing rate of some neurons is greatly modulated by attention while others are hardly affected. The reason for this variability across neurons is unknown. We found that the variability in attention modulation across neurons in area MT of macaques can be well explained by variability in the strength of tuned normalization across neurons. The presence of tuned normalization also explains a striking asymmetry in attention effects within neurons: when two stimuli are in a neuron's receptive field, directing attention to the preferred stimulus modulates firing rates more than directing attention to the nonpreferred stimulus. These findings show that much of the neuron-to-neuron variability in modulation of responses by attention depends on variability in the way the neurons process multiple stimuli, rather than differences in the influence of top-down signals related to attention.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22365552      PMCID: PMC3292773          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.01.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuron        ISSN: 0896-6273            Impact factor:   17.173


  62 in total

Review 1.  Cortical mechanisms of space-based and object-based attentional control.

Authors:  Steven Yantis; John T Serences
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 6.627

Review 2.  Attentional modulation of visual processing.

Authors:  John H Reynolds; Leonardo Chelazzi
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 12.449

3.  Coding of image contrast in central visual pathways of the macaque monkey.

Authors:  G Sclar; J H Maunsell; P Lennie
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Role of inhibition in the specification of orientation selectivity of cells in the cat striate cortex.

Authors:  A B Bonds
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.241

5.  Functional implications of cross-orientation inhibition of cortical visual cells. I. Neurophysiological evidence.

Authors:  M C Morrone; D C Burr; L Maffei
Journal:  Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1982-10-22

6.  A grid system and a microsyringe for single cell recording.

Authors:  C F Crist; D S Yamasaki; H Komatsu; R H Wurtz
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 2.390

7.  Selective attention gates visual processing in the extrastriate cortex.

Authors:  J Moran; R Desimone
Journal:  Science       Date:  1985-08-23       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  QUEST: a Bayesian adaptive psychometric method.

Authors:  A B Watson; D G Pelli
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1983-02

9.  Increased attention enhances both behavioral and neuronal performance.

Authors:  H Spitzer; R Desimone; J Moran
Journal:  Science       Date:  1988-04-15       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Multiple visual areas in the caudal superior temporal sulcus of the macaque.

Authors:  R Desimone; L G Ungerleider
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1986-06-08       Impact factor: 3.215

View more
  48 in total

Review 1.  Circuits for Action and Cognition: A View from the Superior Colliculus.

Authors:  Michele A Basso; Paul J May
Journal:  Annu Rev Vis Sci       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 6.422

2.  Input-gain control produces feature-specific surround suppression.

Authors:  Alexander R Trott; Richard T Born
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Neuronal Effects of Spatial and Feature Attention Differ Due to Normalization.

Authors:  Amy M Ni; John H R Maunsell
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  A normalization model suggests that attention changes the weighting of inputs between visual areas.

Authors:  Douglas A Ruff; Marlene R Cohen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Task contingencies and perceptual strategies shape behavioral effects on neuronal response profiles.

Authors:  Nobuya Sato; William K Page; Charles J Duffy
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Visual attention and flexible normalization pools.

Authors:  Odelia Schwartz; Ruben Coen-Cagli
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Correlations in V1 are reduced by stimulation outside the receptive field.

Authors:  Adam C Snyder; Michael J Morais; Adam Kohn; Matthew A Smith
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Normalization of neuronal responses in cortical area MT across signal strengths and motion directions.

Authors:  Jianbo Xiao; Yu-Qiong Niu; Steven Wiesner; Xin Huang
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Stimulus Dependence of Correlated Variability across Cortical Areas.

Authors:  Douglas A Ruff; Marlene R Cohen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Divisive Normalization Predicts Adaptation-Induced Response Changes in Macaque Inferior Temporal Cortex.

Authors:  Dzmitry A Kaliukhovich; Rufin Vogels
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.