Literature DB >> 28461501

A normalization model suggests that attention changes the weighting of inputs between visual areas.

Douglas A Ruff1, Marlene R Cohen2.   

Abstract

Models of divisive normalization can explain the trial-averaged responses of neurons in sensory, association, and motor areas under a wide range of conditions, including how visual attention changes the gains of neurons in visual cortex. Attention, like other modulatory processes, is also associated with changes in the extent to which pairs of neurons share trial-to-trial variability. We showed recently that in addition to decreasing correlations between similarly tuned neurons within the same visual area, attention increases correlations between neurons in primary visual cortex (V1) and the middle temporal area (MT) and that an extension of a classic normalization model can account for this correlation increase. One of the benefits of having a descriptive model that can account for many physiological observations is that it can be used to probe the mechanisms underlying processes such as attention. Here, we use electrical microstimulation in V1 paired with recording in MT to provide causal evidence that the relationship between V1 and MT activity is nonlinear and is well described by divisive normalization. We then use the normalization model and recording and microstimulation experiments to show that the attention dependence of V1-MT correlations is better explained by a mechanism in which attention changes the weights of connections between V1 and MT than by a mechanism that modulates responses in either area. Our study shows that normalization can explain interactions between neurons in different areas and provides a framework for using multiarea recording and stimulation to probe the neural mechanisms underlying neuronal computations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  attention; normalization; variability

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28461501      PMCID: PMC5441794          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1619857114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  47 in total

1.  Modulation of oscillatory neuronal synchronization by selective visual attention.

Authors:  P Fries; J H Reynolds; A E Rorie; R Desimone
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-02-23       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  Attentional modulation of visual processing.

Authors:  John H Reynolds; Leonardo Chelazzi
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 12.449

3.  Stimulus dependence of neuronal correlation in primary visual cortex of the macaque.

Authors:  Adam Kohn; Matthew A Smith
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-04-06       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Gamma-band synchronization in visual cortex predicts speed of change detection.

Authors:  Thilo Womelsdorf; Pascal Fries; Partha P Mitra; Robert Desimone
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-12-21       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Spatial attention decorrelates intrinsic activity fluctuations in macaque area V4.

Authors:  Jude F Mitchell; Kristy A Sundberg; John H Reynolds
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 17.173

6.  The effect of correlated variability on the accuracy of a population code.

Authors:  L F Abbott; P Dayan
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  1999-01-01       Impact factor: 2.026

7.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

Review 8.  Measuring and interpreting neuronal correlations.

Authors:  Marlene R Cohen; Adam Kohn
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-27       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 9.  Normalization as a canonical neural computation.

Authors:  Matteo Carandini; David J Heeger
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 34.870

10.  A normalization model of multisensory integration.

Authors:  Tomokazu Ohshiro; Dora E Angelaki; Gregory C DeAngelis
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2011-05-08       Impact factor: 24.884

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Cholinergic double duty: cue detection and attentional control.

Authors:  Martin Sarter; Cindy Lustig
Journal:  Curr Opin Psychol       Date:  2019-01-04

2.  Neuronal Effects of Spatial and Feature Attention Differ Due to Normalization.

Authors:  Amy M Ni; John H R Maunsell
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Gamma Synchronization between V1 and V4 Improves Behavioral Performance.

Authors:  Gustavo Rohenkohl; Conrado Arturo Bosman; Pascal Fries
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Low rank mechanisms underlying flexible visual representations.

Authors:  Douglas A Ruff; Cheng Xue; Lily E Kramer; Faisal Baqai; Marlene R Cohen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Minimally dependent activity subspaces for working memory and motor preparation in the lateral prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Camilo Libedinsky; Shih-Cheng Yen; Cheng Tang; Roger Herikstad; Aishwarya Parthasarathy
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 6.  Priority coding in the visual system.

Authors:  Nicole C Rust; Marlene R Cohen
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 34.870

7.  Modulation of Spike Count Correlations Between Macaque Primary Visual Cortex Neurons by Difficulty of Attentional Task.

Authors:  Qiyi Hu; Wenjuan Hu; Keyi Liu; Xiangdong Bu; Lisha Hu; Liming Li; Xinyu Chai; Yao Chen
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2021-11-16       Impact factor: 5.271

8.  Attention improves information flow between neuronal populations without changing the communication subspace.

Authors:  Ramanujan Srinath; Douglas A Ruff; Marlene R Cohen
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2021-10-25       Impact factor: 10.834

9.  A flexible readout mechanism of human sensory representations.

Authors:  Daniel Birman; Justin L Gardner
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Normalization governs attentional modulation within human visual cortex.

Authors:  Ilona M Bloem; Sam Ling
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 14.919

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.