BACKGROUND: The number of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices has increased progressively and has led to an increased need for transvenous lead extraction (TLE). Multiple reports of TLE procedural outcomes exist; however, data regarding postprocedural and long-term mortality are limited. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed a retrospective study of consecutive patients undergoing TLE at a single, high-volume center. Patient characteristics, indications, and outcomes were analyzed. A multivariable Cox regression model was developed to identify factors associated with mortality. Between January 2000 and December 2010, 985 patients underwent 1043 TLE procedures. The cohort was 68% male, with a mean age of 63 years (range, 15-95 years) and a left ventricular ejection fraction of 40±17%. Indications included systemic infection (18%), pocket infection (32%), lead malfunction (30%), and other (device upgrade, venous occlusion, and advisory leads; 20%). There were no procedure-related deaths. The mean follow-up was 3.7 years (range, 0.1-11.3 years). Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated a cumulative mortality of 2.1% at 30 days, 4.2% at 3 months, 8.4% at 1 year, and 46.8% at 10 years. In multivariable analysis, systemic infection (hazard ratio [HR], 3.52; 95% CI, 1.95-6.38; P<0.0001), local infection (HR, 2.70; 95% CI, 1.55-4.67; P=0.0004), device system upgrade (HR, 2.14; 95% CI, 1.07-4.25; P=0.03; indication compared with a reference group of extraction for lead malfunction), diabetes mellitus (HR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.25-2.35; P=0.0009), increasing age (HR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.04-1.07; P<0.0001), and serum creatinine (HR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.01-1.35; P=0.04) were significant correlates of increased mortality risk. CONCLUSIONS: Although TLE procedural mortality is exceedingly low at high-volume centers, postprocedural and long-term mortality remain high in certain patient populations, such as elderly patients and those undergoing TLE for infectious indications and device system upgrade. Information regarding TLE long-term outcomes may help guide cardiovascular implantable electronic device and lead management.
BACKGROUND: The number of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices has increased progressively and has led to an increased need for transvenous lead extraction (TLE). Multiple reports of TLE procedural outcomes exist; however, data regarding postprocedural and long-term mortality are limited. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed a retrospective study of consecutive patients undergoing TLE at a single, high-volume center. Patient characteristics, indications, and outcomes were analyzed. A multivariable Cox regression model was developed to identify factors associated with mortality. Between January 2000 and December 2010, 985 patients underwent 1043 TLE procedures. The cohort was 68% male, with a mean age of 63 years (range, 15-95 years) and a left ventricular ejection fraction of 40±17%. Indications included systemic infection (18%), pocket infection (32%), lead malfunction (30%), and other (device upgrade, venous occlusion, and advisory leads; 20%). There were no procedure-related deaths. The mean follow-up was 3.7 years (range, 0.1-11.3 years). Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated a cumulative mortality of 2.1% at 30 days, 4.2% at 3 months, 8.4% at 1 year, and 46.8% at 10 years. In multivariable analysis, systemic infection (hazard ratio [HR], 3.52; 95% CI, 1.95-6.38; P<0.0001), local infection (HR, 2.70; 95% CI, 1.55-4.67; P=0.0004), device system upgrade (HR, 2.14; 95% CI, 1.07-4.25; P=0.03; indication compared with a reference group of extraction for lead malfunction), diabetes mellitus (HR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.25-2.35; P=0.0009), increasing age (HR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.04-1.07; P<0.0001), and serum creatinine (HR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.01-1.35; P=0.04) were significant correlates of increased mortality risk. CONCLUSIONS: Although TLE procedural mortality is exceedingly low at high-volume centers, postprocedural and long-term mortality remain high in certain patient populations, such as elderly patients and those undergoing TLE for infectious indications and device system upgrade. Information regarding TLE long-term outcomes may help guide cardiovascular implantable electronic device and lead management.
Authors: Emily P Zeitler; Yongfei Wang; Kumar Dharmarajan; Kevin J Anstrom; Eric D Peterson; James P Daubert; Jeptha P Curtis; Sana M Al-Khatib Journal: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol Date: 2016-07
Authors: Milena Leo; Alexander J Sharp; Andre Briosa E Gala; Michael T B Pope; Timothy R Betts Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2022-07-14 Impact factor: 1.759
Authors: Anna Polewczyk; Wojciech Jacheć; Luca Segreti; Maria Grazia Bongiorni; Andrzej Kutarski Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-07-21 Impact factor: 4.379