Igor Diemberger1, Rachele Bonfiglioli2, Cristian Martignani3, Maddalena Graziosi3, Mauro Biffi3, Stefano Lorenzetti3, Matteo Ziacchi3, Cristina Nanni2, Stefano Fanti2, Giuseppe Boriani4. 1. Institute of Cardiology, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, University of Bologna, Policlinico S.Orsola-Malpighi, Via Massarenti n. 9, 40138, Bologna, Italy. igor.diemberger@unibo.it. 2. Institute of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, University of Bologna, Policlinico S.Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy. 3. Institute of Cardiology, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, University of Bologna, Policlinico S.Orsola-Malpighi, Via Massarenti n. 9, 40138, Bologna, Italy. 4. Cardiology Division, Department of Diagnostics, Clinical and Public Health Medicine, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Policlinico di Modena, Modena, Italy.
Abstract
PURPOSE: 18F-FDG PET/CT is an emerging technique for diagnosis of cardiac implantable electronic devices infection (CIEDI). Despite the improvements in transvenous lead extraction (TLE), long-term survival in patients with CIEDI is poor. The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether the extension of CIEDI at 18F-FDG PET/CT can improve prediction of survival after TLE. METHODS: Prospective, monocentric observational study enrolling consecutive candidates to TLE for a diagnosis of CIEDI. 18F-FDG PET/CT was performed in all patients prior TLE. RESULTS: There were 105 consecutive patients with confirmed CIEDI enrolled. An increased 18F-FDG uptake was limited to cardiac implantable electrical device (CIED) pocket in 56 patients, 40 patients had a systemic involvement. We had nine negative PET in patients undergoing prolonged antimicrobial therapy (22.5 ± 14.0 days vs. 8.6 ± 13.0 days; p = 0.005). Implementation of 18F-FDG PET/CT in modified Duke Criteria lead to reclassification of 23.8% of the patients. After a mean follow-up of 25.0 ± 9.0 months, 31 patients died (29.5%). Patients with CIED pocket involvement at 18F-FDG PET/CT presented a better survival independently of presence/absence of systemic involvement (HR 0.493, 95%CI 0.240-0.984; p = 0.048). After integration of 18F-FDG PET/CT data, absence of overt/hidden pocket involvement in CIEDI and a (glomerular filtration rate) GFR < 60 ml/min were the only independent predictors of mortality at long term. CONCLUSIONS: Patient with CIEDI and a Cold Closed Pocket (i.e., a CIED pocket without skin erosion/perforation nor increased capitation at 18F-FDG PET/CT) present worse long-term survival. Patient management can benefit by systematic adoption of pre-TLE 18F-FDG PET/CT through improved identification of CIED related endocarditis (CIEDIE) and hidden involvement of CIED pocket.
PURPOSE:18F-FDG PET/CT is an emerging technique for diagnosis of cardiac implantable electronic devices infection (CIEDI). Despite the improvements in transvenous lead extraction (TLE), long-term survival in patients with CIEDI is poor. The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether the extension of CIEDI at 18F-FDG PET/CT can improve prediction of survival after TLE. METHODS: Prospective, monocentric observational study enrolling consecutive candidates to TLE for a diagnosis of CIEDI. 18F-FDG PET/CT was performed in all patients prior TLE. RESULTS: There were 105 consecutive patients with confirmed CIEDI enrolled. An increased 18F-FDG uptake was limited to cardiac implantable electrical device (CIED) pocket in 56 patients, 40 patients had a systemic involvement. We had nine negative PET in patients undergoing prolonged antimicrobial therapy (22.5 ± 14.0 days vs. 8.6 ± 13.0 days; p = 0.005). Implementation of 18F-FDG PET/CT in modified Duke Criteria lead to reclassification of 23.8% of the patients. After a mean follow-up of 25.0 ± 9.0 months, 31 patients died (29.5%). Patients with CIED pocket involvement at 18F-FDG PET/CT presented a better survival independently of presence/absence of systemic involvement (HR 0.493, 95%CI 0.240-0.984; p = 0.048). After integration of 18F-FDG PET/CT data, absence of overt/hidden pocket involvement in CIEDI and a (glomerular filtration rate) GFR < 60 ml/min were the only independent predictors of mortality at long term. CONCLUSIONS:Patient with CIEDI and a Cold Closed Pocket (i.e., a CIED pocket without skin erosion/perforation nor increased capitation at 18F-FDG PET/CT) present worse long-term survival. Patient management can benefit by systematic adoption of pre-TLE 18F-FDG PET/CT through improved identification of CIED related endocarditis (CIEDIE) and hidden involvement of CIED pocket.
Entities:
Keywords:
18F-FDG PET; CIED; Duke criteria; Endocarditis; Survival
Authors: J S Li; D J Sexton; N Mick; R Nettles; V G Fowler; T Ryan; T Bashore; G R Corey Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2000-04-03 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Jean-François Sarrazin; François Philippon; Michel Tessier; Jean Guimond; Franck Molin; Jean Champagne; Isabelle Nault; Louis Blier; Maxime Nadeau; Lyne Charbonneau; Mikaël Trottier; Gilles O'Hara Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2012-05-01 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Bruce L Wilkoff; Charles J Love; Charles L Byrd; Maria Grazia Bongiorni; Roger G Carrillo; George H Crossley; Laurence M Epstein; Richard A Friedman; Charles E H Kennergren; Przemyslaw Mitkowski; Raymond H M Schaerf; Oussama M Wazni Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2009-05-22 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Anna Gomes; Andor W J M Glaudemans; Daan J Touw; Joost P van Melle; Tineke P Willems; Alexander H Maass; Ehsan Natour; Niek H J Prakken; Ronald J H Borra; Peter Paul van Geel; Riemer H J A Slart; Sander van Assen; Bhanu Sinha Journal: Lancet Infect Dis Date: 2016-10-18 Impact factor: 25.071
Authors: Maria G Bongiorni; Haran Burri; Jean C Deharo; Christoph Starck; Charles Kennergren; Laszlo Saghy; Archana Rao; Carlo Tascini; Nigel Lever; Andrzej Kutarski; Ignacio Fernandez Lozano; Neil Strathmore; Roberto Costa; Laurence Epstein; Charles Love; Carina Blomstrom-Lundqvist Journal: Europace Date: 2018-07-01 Impact factor: 5.214
Authors: Arnold J Greenspon; Jordan M Prutkin; Muhammad R Sohail; Holenarasipur R Vikram; Larry M Baddour; Stephan B Danik; James Peacock; Carlos Falces; Jose M Miro; Elisabeth Blank; Christoph Naber; Roger G Carrillo; Chi-Hong Tseng; Daniel Z Uslan Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2012-02-14 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Dorota Nowosielecka; Wojciech Jacheć; Anna Polewczyk; Łukasz Tułecki; Andrzej Kleinrok; Andrzej Kutarski Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-02-14 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Riemer H J A Slart; Andor W J M Glaudemans; Olivier Gheysens; Mark Lubberink; Tanja Kero; Marc R Dweck; Gilbert Habib; Oliver Gaemperli; Antti Saraste; Alessia Gimelli; Panagiotis Georgoulias; Hein J Verberne; Jan Bucerius; Christoph Rischpler; Fabien Hyafil; Paola A Erba Journal: Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2020-12-01 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Riemer H J A Slart; Andor W J M Glaudemans; Olivier Gheysens; Mark Lubberink; Tanja Kero; Marc R Dweck; Gilbert Habib; Oliver Gaemperli; Antti Saraste; Alessia Gimelli; Panagiotis Georgoulias; Hein J Verberne; Jan Bucerius; Christoph Rischpler; Fabien Hyafil; Paola A Erba Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2020-10-27 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Giuseppe Boriani; Marco Proietti; Matteo Bertini; Igor Diemberger; Pietro Palmisano; Stefano Baccarini; Francesco Biscione; Nicola Bottoni; Antonio Ciccaglioni; Alessandro Dal Monte; Franco Alberto Ferrari; Saverio Iacopino; Marcello Piacenti; Daniele Porcelli; Stefano Sangiorgio; Luca Santini; Michele Malagù; Giuseppe Stabile; Jacopo Francesco Imberti; Davide Caruso; Massimo Zoni-Berisso; Roberto De Ponti; Renato Pietro Ricci Journal: J Pers Med Date: 2022-01-11