BACKGROUND: Tumor ablation as a means of treating breast cancer is being investigated. Microwave energy is promising because it can preferentially heat high-water-content breast carcinomas, compared to adipose and glandular tissues. METHODS: This is a prospective, multicenter, nonrandomized dose-escalation study of microwave treatment. Thermal dose was measured as (1) thermal equivalent minutes (cumulative equivalent minutes; CEM) of treatment relative to a temperature of 43 degrees C and (2) peak tumor temperature. Microwaves were guided by an antenna-temperature sensor placed percutaneously into the tumor. Outcomes measured were pathologic response (tumor necrosis) side effects. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients (mean age, 57 years) were enrolled. The mean tumor diameter was 1.8 cm. Tumoricidal temperatures (>43 degrees C) were reached in 23 patients (92%). Tumor size was unchanged after thermotherapy (P = not significant). Pathologic necrosis was achieved in 17 (68%) patients. Complete necrosis of the invasive component was achieved in two patients. One hundred forty CEM is predictive of a 50% tumor response, and 210 CEM is predictive of a 100% tumor response (P =.003). Univariate linear regression predicts that peak tumor temperatures of 47.4 degrees C and 49.7 degrees C cause a 50% tumor response and a 100% tumor response, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Thermotherapy causes tumor necrosis and can be performed safely with minimal morbidity. The degree of tumor necrosis is a function of the thermal dose. Future studies will evaluate the impact of high doses of thermotherapy on margin status and complete tumor ablation.
BACKGROUND:Tumor ablation as a means of treating breast cancer is being investigated. Microwave energy is promising because it can preferentially heat high-water-content breast carcinomas, compared to adipose and glandular tissues. METHODS: This is a prospective, multicenter, nonrandomized dose-escalation study of microwave treatment. Thermal dose was measured as (1) thermal equivalent minutes (cumulative equivalent minutes; CEM) of treatment relative to a temperature of 43 degrees C and (2) peak tumor temperature. Microwaves were guided by an antenna-temperature sensor placed percutaneously into the tumor. Outcomes measured were pathologic response (tumor necrosis) side effects. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients (mean age, 57 years) were enrolled. The mean tumor diameter was 1.8 cm. Tumoricidal temperatures (>43 degrees C) were reached in 23 patients (92%). Tumor size was unchanged after thermotherapy (P = not significant). Pathologic necrosis was achieved in 17 (68%) patients. Complete necrosis of the invasive component was achieved in two patients. One hundred forty CEM is predictive of a 50% tumor response, and 210 CEM is predictive of a 100% tumor response (P =.003). Univariate linear regression predicts that peak tumor temperatures of 47.4 degrees C and 49.7 degrees C cause a 50% tumor response and a 100% tumor response, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Thermotherapy causes tumor necrosis and can be performed safely with minimal morbidity. The degree of tumor necrosis is a function of the thermal dose. Future studies will evaluate the impact of high doses of thermotherapy on margin status and complete tumor ablation.
Authors: Alireza Mashal; Balaji Sitharaman; Xu Li; Pramod K Avti; Alan V Sahakian; John H Booske; Susan C Hagness Journal: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng Date: 2010-02-18 Impact factor: 4.538
Authors: Giovanni Mauri; Luca Maria Sconfienza; Lorenzo Carlo Pescatori; Maria Paola Fedeli; Marco Alì; Giovanni Di Leo; Francesco Sardanelli Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2017-01-03 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Suzette M Aguilar; Jacob D Shea; Mudar A Al-Joumayly; Barry D Van Veen; Nader Behdad; Susan C Hagness Journal: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng Date: 2011-05-27 Impact factor: 4.538
Authors: Alicia A Petryk; Andrew J Giustini; Rachel E Gottesman; B Stuart Trembly; P Jack Hoopes Journal: Int J Hyperthermia Date: 2013-12 Impact factor: 3.914
Authors: Stijn van Esser; Maurice A A J van den Bosch; Paul J van Diest; Willem Th M Mali; Inne H M Borel Rinkes; Richard van Hillegersberg Journal: World J Surg Date: 2007-12 Impact factor: 3.352