Literature DB >> 22357861

Dynamics of normalization underlying masking in human visual cortex.

Jeffrey J Tsai1, Alex R Wade, Anthony M Norcia.   

Abstract

Stimulus visibility can be reduced by other stimuli that overlap the same region of visual space, a process known as masking. Here we studied the neural mechanisms of masking in humans using source-imaged steady state visual evoked potentials and frequency-domain analysis over a wide range of relative stimulus strengths of test and mask stimuli. Test and mask stimuli were tagged with distinct temporal frequencies and we quantified spectral response components associated with the individual stimuli (self terms) and responses due to interaction between stimuli (intermodulation terms). In early visual cortex, masking alters the self terms in a manner consistent with a reduction of input contrast. We also identify a novel signature of masking: a robust intermodulation term that peaks when the test and mask stimuli have equal contrast and disappears when they are widely different. We fit all of our data simultaneously with family of a divisive gain control models that differed only in their dynamics. Models with either very short or very long temporal integration constants for the gain pool performed worse than a model with an integration time of ∼30 ms. Finally, the absolute magnitudes of the response were controlled by the ratio of the stimulus contrasts, not their absolute values. This contrast-contrast invariance suggests that many neurons in early visual cortex code relative rather than absolute contrast. Together, these results provide a more complete description of masking within the normalization framework of contrast gain control and suggest that contrast normalization accomplishes multiple functional goals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22357861      PMCID: PMC3337145          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4485-11.2012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  58 in total

1.  Contrast response characteristics of long-range lateral interactions in cat striate cortex.

Authors:  C C Chen; T Kasamatsu; U Polat; A M Norcia
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2001-03-26       Impact factor: 1.837

2.  The contribution of noise to contrast invariance of orientation tuning in cat visual cortex.

Authors:  J S Anderson; I Lampl; D C Gillespie; D Ferster
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-12-08       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Measurement and modeling of center-surround suppression and enhancement.

Authors:  J Xing; D J Heeger
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Natural signal statistics and sensory gain control.

Authors:  O Schwartz; E P Simoncelli
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  Neural noise can explain expansive, power-law nonlinearities in neural response functions.

Authors:  Kenneth D Miller; Todd W Troyer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  A contrast paradox in stereopsis, motion detection, and vernier acuity.

Authors:  S B Stevenson; L K Cormack
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Suppression without inhibition in visual cortex.

Authors:  Tobe C B Freeman; Séverine Durand; Daniel C Kiper; Matteo Carandini
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2002-08-15       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  Normalization models applied to orientation masking in the human infant.

Authors:  T R Candy; A M Skoczenski; A M Norcia
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-06-15       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Two distinct mechanisms of suppression in human vision.

Authors:  Yury Petrov; Matteo Carandini; Suzanne McKee
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-09-21       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Changes in cortical activity during suppression in stereoblindness.

Authors:  A M Norcia; R A Harrad; R J Brown
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2000-04-07       Impact factor: 1.837

View more
  26 in total

1.  Value-based attentional capture influences context-dependent decision-making.

Authors:  Sirawaj Itthipuripat; Kexin Cha; Napat Rangsipat; John T Serences
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 2.  The steady-state visual evoked potential in vision research: A review.

Authors:  Anthony M Norcia; L Gregory Appelbaum; Justin M Ales; Benoit R Cottereau; Bruno Rossion
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Steady-state contrast response functions provide a sensitive and objective index of amblyopic deficits.

Authors:  Daniel H Baker; Mathieu Simard; Dave Saint-Amour; Robert F Hess
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  More is not always better: adaptive gain control explains dissociation between perception and action.

Authors:  Claudio Simoncini; Laurent U Perrinet; Anna Montagnini; Pascal Mamassian; Guillaume S Masson
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2012-09-30       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  Altered visual contrast gain control is sensitive for idiopathic generalized epilepsies.

Authors:  Daehan Won; Wonsuk Kim; W Art Chaovalitwongse; Jeffrey J Tsai
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-12-18       Impact factor: 3.708

6.  Attention to Multiple Objects Facilitates Their Integration in Prefrontal and Parietal Cortex.

Authors:  Yee-Joon Kim; Jeffrey J Tsai; Jeffrey Ojemann; Preeti Verghese
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-04-14       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Excitatory Contribution to Binocular Interactions in Human Visual Cortex Is Reduced in Strabismic Amblyopia.

Authors:  Chuan Hou 侯川; Terence L Tyson; Ismet J Uner; Spero C Nicholas; Preeti Verghese
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-08-25       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Contrast Normalization Accounts for Binocular Interactions in Human Striate and Extra-striate Visual Cortex.

Authors:  Chuan Hou; Spero C Nicholas; Preeti Verghese
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 9.  How to use fMRI functional localizers to improve EEG/MEG source estimation.

Authors:  Benoit R Cottereau; Justin M Ales; Anthony M Norcia
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 2.390

10.  EEGSourceSim: A framework for realistic simulation of EEG scalp data using MRI-based forward models and biologically plausible signals and noise.

Authors:  Elham Barzegaran; Sebastian Bosse; Peter J Kohler; Anthony M Norcia
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 2.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.