Literature DB >> 11000389

A contrast paradox in stereopsis, motion detection, and vernier acuity.

S B Stevenson1, L K Cormack.   

Abstract

Stereoacuity improves with increasing contrast, unless the increase is monocular. In this case performance paradoxically suffers. This study examined whether this contrast paradox occurs for two other classes of visual judgment: two-frame motion and vernier acuity. We constructed three homologous tasks in which the two components of a gabor stimulus (stereo half-images, motion frames, vernier components) were either both high contrast, both low contrast, or mismatched. The contrast paradox was evident in all three tasks and showed a similar spatial frequency dependence. We suggest the contrast paradox results from the combination of mismatched signals by a single filter.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11000389     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(00)00164-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  8 in total

1.  Systematic misestimation in a vernier task arising from contrast mismatch.

Authors:  Hao Sun; Barry B Lee; Rigmor C Baraas
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  2008-03-06       Impact factor: 3.241

2.  Contrast gain-control in stereo depth and cyclopean contrast perception.

Authors:  Fang Hou; Chang-Bing Huang; Ju Liang; Yifeng Zhou; Zhong-Lin Lu
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-01-01       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Binocular function during unequal monocular input.

Authors:  Taekjun Kim; Ralph D Freeman
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 3.386

4.  Dynamics of normalization underlying masking in human visual cortex.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Tsai; Alex R Wade; Anthony M Norcia
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Paradoxical psychometric functions ("swan functions") are explained by dilution masking in four stimulus dimensions.

Authors:  Daniel H Baker; Tim S Meese; Mark A Georgeson
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2013-01-02

6.  A common rule for integration and suppression of luminance contrast across eyes, space, time, and pattern.

Authors:  Tim S Meese; Daniel H Baker
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2013-01-02

7.  Calibration of random dot stereograms and correlograms free of monocular cues.

Authors:  János Radó; Zoltán Sári; Péter Buzás; Gábor Jandó
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Apparent sharpness of 3D video when one eye's view is more blurry.

Authors:  Alan Robinson; Ankit Jain; Mathew Scott; Don Macleod; Truong Nguyen
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2013-08-28
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.