| Literature DB >> 22356827 |
Balaji Balagurunathan1, Sudhakar Jonnalagadda, Lily Tan, Rajagopalan Srinivasan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Fermentation of xylose, the major component in hemicellulose, is essential for economic conversion of lignocellulosic biomass to fuels and chemicals. The yeast Scheffersomyces stipitis (formerly known as Pichia stipitis) has the highest known native capacity for xylose fermentation and possesses several genes for lignocellulose bioconversion in its genome. Understanding the metabolism of this yeast at a global scale, by reconstructing the genome scale metabolic model, is essential for manipulating its metabolic capabilities and for successful transfer of its capabilities to other industrial microbes.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22356827 PMCID: PMC3310799 DOI: 10.1186/1475-2859-11-27
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microb Cell Fact ISSN: 1475-2859 Impact factor: 5.328
Figure 1Iterative procedure for reconstruction of the genome scale metabolic network of .
Macromolecular composition of S. stipitis Biomass
| Biomass Composition of | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Aspartic Acid | 0.1566 | dAMP | 0.0112 |
| Threonine | 0.1809 | dTMP | 0.0112 |
| Serine | 0.2330 | dGMP | 0.0084 |
| Glutamic Acid | 0.3190 | dCMP | 0.0084 |
| Glycine | 0.4724 | ||
| Alanine | 0.4735 | AMP | 0.0444 |
| Cystine | 0.0511 | UMP | 0.0522 |
| Valine | 0.2201 | GMP | 0.0361 |
| Methionine | 0.0559 | CMP | 0.0388 |
| Iso-Leucine | 0.1454 | ||
| Leucine | 0.2451 | Sterol (ergosterol) | 0.0560 |
| Tyrosine | 0.0741 | ||
| Phenylalanine | 0.1127 | PhosphatidylInositol | 0.0015 |
| Histidine | 0.1005 | Phosphatidylethanolamine | 0.0041 |
| Lysine | 0.2624 | Phosphatidylcholine | 0.0255 |
| Arginine | 0.1821 | ||
| Tryptophan | 0.0248 | Glycogen | 0.2714 |
| Proline | 0.1592 | Trehalose | 0.0760 |
| Asparagine | 0.1511 | Glucan | 0.6107 |
| Glutamine | 0.1817 | Mannan | 0.7156 |
| Chitin | 0.4528 | ||
Figure 2Characteristics of the genome scale metabolic network. A) Statistics. B) Functional classification of metabolic reactions in the model. C) Functional classification of the non-gene associated metabolic reactions in the model. D) Functional classification of enzyme classes in the model.
Figure 3Reaction essentiality, gene essentiality and amino acid production capability. A) Functional distribution of the essential reactions in the model. B) Functional distribution of the essential genes in the model. C) Comparison of the amino acid production capability of S. stipitis and S. cerevisiae metabolic network on a carbon mole basis.
Figure 4Network expansion and metabolic gap analysis based on high-throughput substrate utilization data. A) Comparison of experimental data from Biolog phenotype micro-arrays to model predictions across different substrate categories. Results are scored as + or - meaning growth or no growth determined from in vivo/in silico data. The n represents that corresponding pathway could not be included in the S. stipitis network due to unknown pathway enzymes. B) Improvement of prediction accuracy C) Comparison of incorrect predictions (+/- and -/+ cases in (A)) with published experimental results. (D) Comparison of in silico predictions with published experimental results for the Biolog substrates identified as low-confidence data. The Biolog data was considered as low confidence growth when the inference of growth/no-growth was difficult from the absorbance measurements. In vivo1 from Biolog phenotyping, in vivo2 from literature.
List of reactions that lead to anaerobic growth on glucose identified by single reaction insertion analysis
| S.NO | R Numbers | Reaction Formula | Biomass Flux | Reaction Flux |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | R00090* | h2o2[c] + h[c] + nadh[c] < = > 2 h2o[c] + nad[c] | 0.4049 | -20.0000 |
| 2 | R00094* | nad[c] + 2 gthrd[c] < = > h[c] + nadh[c] + gthox[c] | 0.4049 | 20.0000 |
| 3 | R00113* | h2o2[c] + h[c] + nadph[c] < = > 2 h2o[c] + nadp[c] | 0.4491 | -20.0000 |
| 4 | R00115* | nadp[c] + 2 gthrd[c] < = > h[c] + nadph[c] + gthox[c] | 0.4491 | 20.0000 |
| 5 | R00211$ | o2[c] + pyr[c] + coa[c] < = > h2o2[c] + accoa[c] + co2[c] | 0.2279 | -2.6049 |
| 6 | R00319$ | o2[c] + lac-L[c] < = > h2o[c] + ac[c] + co2[c] | 0.6300 | -20.0000 |
| 7 | R00360$ | o2[c] + mal-L[c] < = > oaa[c] + h2o2[c] | 0.2079 | -0.1820 |
| 8 | R00475$ | o2[c] + glyclt[c] < = > glx[c] + h2o2[c] | 0.2038 | -0.0225 |
| 9 | R00481$ | asp-L[c] + o2[c] < = > h2o2[c] + iasp[c] | 0.2055 | -0.1579 |
| 10 | R00500* | 2 gthrd[c] < = > gthox[c] | 0.6061 | 20.0000 |
| 11 | R00533$ | h2o[c] + o2[c] + so3[c] < = > h2o2[c] + so4[c] | 0.2133 | -0.2130 |
| 12 | R00846$ | o2[c] + glyc3p[c] < = > h2o2[c] + dhap[c] | 0.2075 | -0.1817 |
| 13 | R01712* | pyr[c] + pydam[c] < = > ala-L[c] + pydx[c] | 0.4073 | 20.0000 |
| 14 | R01713* | oaa[c] + pydam[c] < = > asp-L[c] + pydx[c] | 0.4049 | 20.0000 |
| 15 | R01769$ | h2o[c] + o2[c] + hxan[c] < = > h2o2[c] + xan[c] | 0.2079 | -0.1820 |
| 16 | R01797# | h2o[c] + cdpdag[c] < = > pa[c] + cmp[c] | 17.8571 | -7.4901 |
| 17 | R01799# | pa[c] + ctp[c] < = > ppi[c] + cdpdag[c] | 17.8571 | 7.5572 |
| 18 | R01800# | ser-L[c] + cdpdag[c] < = > cmp[c] + ps[c] | 0.2073 | -0.0005 |
| 19 | R01866# | nadp[c] + dhor-S[c] < = > h[c] + nadph[c] + orot[c] | 0.2062 | 0.0228 |
| 20 | R01869# | nad[c] + dhor-S[c] < = > h[c] + nadh[c] + orot[c] | 0.2056 | 0.0227 |
| 21 | R01879$ | akg[c] + o2[c] + duri[c] < = > co2[c] + succ[c] + uri[c] | 0.3581 | -12.8155 |
| 22 | R01909* | atp[c] + pydxn[c] < = > adp[c] + pdx5p[c] | 0.3147 | -20.0000 |
| 23 | R01911* | pi[c] + pydxn[c] < = > h2o[c] + pdx5p[c] | 0.2312 | -1.0484 |
| 24 | R02107$ | h2o[c] + o2[c] + xan[c] < = > h2o2[c] + urate[c] | 0.2079 | -0.1820 |
| 25 | R05717* | amp[c] + gthox[c] + so3[c] < = > 2 gthrd[c] + aps[c] | 0.3186 | -20.0000 |
| 26 | R05794# | chol[c] + cdpdag[c] < = > pc[c] + cmp[c] | 0.2051 | -0.0002 |
| 27 | R07171$ | o2[c] + h[c] + nadh[c] < = > h2o2[c] + nad[c] | 0.2079 | -0.1820 |
| 28 | R07172$ | o2[c] + h[c] + nadph[c] < = > h2o2[c] + nadp[c] | 0.2125 | -0.2089 |
$ Direct formation of oxygen; # Indirect formation of oxygen through H2O2; # Reactions selected for further analysis
Figure 5In silico analysis of xylose uptake. Dependence of xylose uptake rate on oxygen uptake rate for various NADPH/NADH ratios for xylose reductase.
Figure 6In silico analysis of ethanol production. Ethanol production as function of oxygen uptake rate for various NADPH/NADH ratios for xylose reductase. The NADPH/NADH ratio was varied from zero to a very high value (1000000).
Figure 7Cofactor balancing pathway. Enzymatic reactions which were reported to convert NADH to NADPH in S. stipitis. GDH2--NAD-dependent Glutamate dehydrogenase, GAD2--Glutamate decarboxylase, UGA1--4-aminobutyrate aminotransferase (UGA1.1 or UGA1.2) and UGA2--Succinate semialdehyde dehydrogenase (UGA2 or UGA2.2).
Effect of inhibition of various mitochondrial respiratory complexes on the growth of Scheffersomyces stipitis in glucose and xylose. (--) Complete Inhibition; (-) Partial Inhibition; (0) Negligible; (++) Enhanced; NA - Information not available
| Complex/Inhibitor | Effect on Growth | Effect on Growth Complex formation AOX and Complex III or IV (Predicted from model analysis) | References | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glucose | Xylose | Glucose | Xylose | ||
| Complex I | (--/0) | (-/0) | (--/--) | (-/-) | Shi et al., 2002 |
| Complex III | (NA/-) | (-/-) | (NA/-) | (-/-) | Lighthelm et |
| AOX (SHAM) | (0/0) | (++/0) | (0/0) | (++/++) | Jeppsson et al., 1995 |
| Complex IV | (-/-) | (-/-) | (-/-) | (-/-) | Jeppsson et al., 1995 |
| Complex IV and | (NA/--) | --/--) | (NA/--) | --/--) | Lighthelm et al., 1988 |
| Complex IV(Cyanide) and AOX (SHAM) | (--/--) | (--/--) | (--/--) | (--/--) | Jeppsson et al., 1995 |
| Complex I (Rotenone) + del AOX | (--/0) | (--/0) | (--/--) | (--/--) | Shi et al., 2002 |
| Complex I (Rotenone) + del Complex IV | (--/-) | (--/-) | (--/--) | (--/--) | Shi et al., 2002 |