Literature DB >> 22356246

Meta-analysis of survival based on resection margin status following surgery for recurrent rectal cancer.

A Bhangu1, S M Ali, A Darzi, G Brown, P Tekkis.   

Abstract

AIM: To determine the presence and duration of survival advantages was investigated for resection margin status (R0, R1 or R2) following surgery for locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC).
METHOD: A systematic review of the literature was performed for studies comparing resection margin status for LRRC. Weighted mean differences and meta-analysis of hazard ratios were used as a measure of median and overall cumulative survival.
RESULTS: Twenty-two studies were included, providing outcome for 1460 patients undergoing surgery for LRRC. 57% underwent an R0 resection, 25% an R1 resection and 11% an R2 resection. The most commonly performed operations were abdominoperineal excision (35%), exenteration (23%) and anterior resection (21%). The range of median survival per resection margin was R0 28-92 months, R1 12-50 months, R2 6-17 months. Patients undergoing an R0 resection survived on average for 37.6 (95% confidence interval: 23.5-51.7) months longer than those undergoing R1 resection and 53.0 (31.2-74.8) months longer than those undergoing R2 resection. This correlated to a hazard ratio of 2.03 (1.73-2.38) for R0 vs R1 and 3.41 (2.21-5.25) for R0 vs R2. Patients undergoing R1 resection survived on average 13.3 (7.23-19.4) months longer than those undergoing R2 resection [hazard ratio of 1.68 (1.33-2.12)].
CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing R0 resection have the greatest survival advantage following surgery for recurrent rectal cancer. There is a survival advantage for R1 over R2 resection, but there may be no benefit of R2 resection over palliative treatment.
© 2012 The Authors. Colorectal Disease © 2012 The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22356246     DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2012.03005.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 1462-8910            Impact factor:   3.788


  23 in total

1.  Factors associated with the location of local rectal cancer recurrence and predictors of survival.

Authors:  Peng Du; John P Burke; Wisam Khoury; Ian C Lavery; Ravi P Kiran; Feza H Remzi; David W Dietz
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Effect of particle beam radiotherapy on locally recurrent rectal cancer: Three case reports.

Authors:  Yukako Mokutani; Hirofumi Yamamoto; Mamoru Uemura; Naotsugu Haraguchi; Hidekazu Takahashi; Junichi Nishimura; Taishi Hata; Ichiro Takemasa; Tsunekazu Mizushima; Yuichiro Doki; Masaki Mori
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-03-30

3.  R0 resection, not surgical technique, is the key consideration in pelvic exenteration surgery.

Authors:  O J Warren; M J Solomon
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2014-12-28       Impact factor: 3.781

4.  Posterior high sacral segmental disconnection prior to anterior en bloc exenteration for recurrent rectal cancer.

Authors:  K G M Brown; M J Solomon; K K S Austin; P J Lee; P Stalley
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 5.  Locally Advanced Disease and Pelvic Exenterations.

Authors:  Christos Kontovounisios; Paris Tekkis
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2017-12-01

6.  Outcomes and prognostic factors of multimodality treatment for locally recurrent rectal cancer with curative intent.

Authors:  Thomas G Bird; Samuel Y Ngan; Julie Chu; René Kroon; Andrew C Lynch; Alexander G Heriot
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 7.  Surveillance after curative treatment for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Eric P van der Stok; Manon C W Spaander; Dirk J Grünhagen; Cornelis Verhoef; Ernst J Kuipers
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 66.675

8.  The significance of extramural venous invasion in R1 positive rectal cancer.

Authors:  N M Ormsby; H N Bermingham; H M Joshi; M Chadwick; A Samad; D Maitra; M Scott; S Kelly; K Whitmarsh; R Rajaganeshan
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Complications and 5-year survival after radical resections which include urological organs for locally advanced and recurrent pelvic malignancies: analysis of 646 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Oliver Peacock; Peadar S Waters; Joseph C Kong; Satish K Warrier; Chris Wakeman; Tim Eglinton; Declan G Murphy; Alexander G Heriot; Frank A Frizelle; Jacob J McCormick
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 3.781

10.  Transperineal retropubic approach in total pelvic exenteration for advanced and recurrent colorectal and anal cancer involving the penile base: technique and outcomes.

Authors:  A M Mehta; G Hellawell; D Burling; S Littler; A Antoniou; J T Jenkins
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 3.781

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.