Literature DB >> 30306276

Transperineal retropubic approach in total pelvic exenteration for advanced and recurrent colorectal and anal cancer involving the penile base: technique and outcomes.

A M Mehta1, G Hellawell2, D Burling3, S Littler4, A Antoniou1, J T Jenkins5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Complete pathological resection of locally advanced and recurrent anorectal cancer is considered the most important determinant of survival outcome. Involvement of the retropubic space with cancer threatening or involving the penile base poses specific challenges due to the potential for margin involvement and blood loss from the dorsal venous plexus. In the present study we evaluate a new transperineal surgical approach to excision of anterior compartment organs involved or threatened by cancer which facilitates exposure and visualisation of the bulbar urethra and the deep vein of the penis caudal to the retropubic space and penile base.
METHODS: A retrospective study was performed on male patients with tumour extension into the penile base treated at our institution using the transperineal surgical approach. Descriptive data for patient demographics, radiology, operative details, postoperative histology, complications and outcomes were collated.
RESULTS: Ten male patients with tumour extension into the penile base were identified. Two patients had recurrent anal cancer, 6 had locally advanced primary rectal cancer and 2 had recurrent rectal cancer. All patients had exenterative surgery with excision of the penile base utilising the transperineal approach. All patients had R0 resection. No local recurrence developed after a median follow up period of 15 months.
CONCLUSIONS: The transperineal approach to the penile base and retropubic space allows for high rates of R0 resection margin status with direct visualisation of the dorsal venous plexus, thereby minimising blood loss. In our experience, this technique is the preferred approach to excision of cancers threatening and involving the penile base and also for most male patients requiring total pelvic exenteration.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dorsal venous plexus; Exenteration; Locally advanced rectal cancer; Penile base excision; Recurrent rectal cancer

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30306276     DOI: 10.1007/s10151-018-1852-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tech Coloproctol        ISSN: 1123-6337            Impact factor:   3.781


  23 in total

Review 1.  Primary versus Flap Closure of Perineal Defects following Oncologic Resection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Chris Devulapalli; Anne Tong Jia Wei; Jennifer R DiBiagio; Marcelo L Baez; Pablo A Baltodano; Stella M Seal; Justin M Sacks; Carisa M Cooney; Gedge D Rosson
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 4.730

2.  Extended radical resection: the choice for locally recurrent rectal cancer.

Authors:  Alexander G Heriot; Christopher M Byrne; Peter Lee; Bruce Dobbs; Henry Tilney; Michael J Solomon; John Mackay; Frank Frizelle
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2008-01-19       Impact factor: 4.585

3.  Assessing the impact of a sacral resection on morbidity and survival after extended radical surgery for locally recurrent rectal cancer.

Authors:  Tony Milne; Michael J Solomon; Peter Lee; Jane M Young; Paul Stalley; James D Harrison
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 4.  Management of the Perineal Defect after Abdominoperineal Excision.

Authors:  Colin Peirce; Sean Martin
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2016-06

5.  Lateral pelvic compartment excision during pelvic exenteration.

Authors:  M J Solomon; K G M Brown; C E Koh; P Lee; K K S Austin; L Masya
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Perineal reconstruction after abdominoperineal excision using inferior gluteal artery perforator flaps.

Authors:  A Hainsworth; M Al Akash; P Roblin; P Mohanna; D Ross; M L George
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2012-01-09       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Meta-analysis of survival based on resection margin status following surgery for recurrent rectal cancer.

Authors:  A Bhangu; S M Ali; A Darzi; G Brown; P Tekkis
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.788

8.  Management of locally advanced primary and recurrent rectal cancer.

Authors:  Johannes H W de Wilt; Maarten Vermaas; Floris T J Ferenschild; Cornelis Verhoef
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2007-08

9.  Pelvic exenteration with en bloc iliac vessel resection for lateral pelvic wall involvement.

Authors:  Kirk K S Austin; Michael J Solomon
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.585

10.  Current UK management of locally recurrent rectal cancer.

Authors:  D P Harji; B Griffiths; D R McArthur; P M Sagar
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.788

View more
  2 in total

1.  Feasibility of laparoscopic-assisted transanal pelvic exenteration in locally advanced rectal cancer with anterior invasion.

Authors:  T Nonaka; T Tominaga; Y Akazawa; T Sawai; Takeshi Nagayasu
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2020-08-19       Impact factor: 3.781

2.  Efficacy of Applying Kanglaite Injection under Incentive Nursing Intervention in Treating Patients with Advanced Penile Carcinoma and Its Effect on Treatment Compliance.

Authors:  Juan Wang; Qingyan Liu; Mei Hong; Ge Li; Yong Cheng
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2021-10-25       Impact factor: 2.629

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.