Literature DB >> 27695932

The significance of extramural venous invasion in R1 positive rectal cancer.

N M Ormsby1, H N Bermingham2, H M Joshi2, M Chadwick2, A Samad2, D Maitra2, M Scott2, S Kelly2, K Whitmarsh2, R Rajaganeshan2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Evidence has shown that a positive resection margin (R1) is a key determinant of subsequent local recurrence and a poor prognostic factor in rectal cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes and prognosticators in patients with R1 resection of rectal cancer.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective study of all patients operatively managed within our institution between April 2008 and April 2013 for rectal cancer. Baseline demographics and multiple outcome measures recorded. Overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and recurrence were the primary outcome measures.
RESULTS: Overall, there were 306 primary rectal cancers. Seventy-six percent were grade T3/4 tumours. OS was 30 months. R1 rate was 16 % (48 patients). Thirty-one patients underwent APR and 17 AR. In patients who responded to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), overall survival was 55 months, with no extramural venous invasion (EMV) seen in this cohort. In non-responders OS was 29 months, with EMV in 48 %. In patients who did not receive NAC, OS was 23 months, with EMV in 74 %. EMV is a strong predictor for poor survival following R1 (p = 0.001). We also found a correlation between number of positive nodes and OS/DFS (p = 0.004).
CONCLUSIONS: In this small cohort of patients with R1 positive rectal cancers, response to NAC is the strongest predictor of poor overall and disease-free survival. In patients who respond to NAC, OS and DFS has been shown to be positive, with a reduced rate of EMV.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Rectal cancer; Recurrence; Resection margin

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27695932     DOI: 10.1007/s00384-016-2658-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  17 in total

1.  Can histopathologic assessment of circumferential margin after preoperative pelvic chemoradiotherapy for T3-T4 rectal cancer predict for 3-year disease-free survival?

Authors:  Suzannah Mawdsley; Rob Glynne-Jones; Juliet Grainger; Paul Richman; Andreas Makris; Mark Harrison; Richard Ashford; Richard A Harrison; Melanie Osborne; Jeremy I Livingstone; Peter MacDonald; Ian C Mitchell; John Meyrick-Thomas; John M A Northover; Alastair Windsor; Richard Novell; Marina Wallace
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2005-11-01       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Prospective single-arm study of intraoperative radiotherapy for locally advanced or recurrent rectal cancer.

Authors:  Jennifer Tan; Alexander G Heriot; Jack Mackay; Sylvia Van Dyk; Mathias Ab Bressel; Chris D Fox; Andrew C Hui; A Craig Lynch; Trevor Leong; Samuel Y Ngan
Journal:  J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 1.735

3.  Intraoperative radiation therapy for locally advanced primary and recurrent colorectal cancer: ten-year institutional experience.

Authors:  John R Hyngstrom; Ching-Wei D Tzeng; Sam Beddar; Prajnan Das; Sunil Krishnan; Marc E Delclos; Christopher H Crane; George J Chang; Y Nancy You; Barry W Feig; John M Skibber; Miguel A Rodriguez-Bigas
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 3.454

4.  Prognostic significance of circumferential margin involvement in rectal adenocarcinoma treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy and low anterior resection.

Authors:  Pedro Luna-Pérez; Efraín Bustos-Cholico; Isabel Alvarado; Antonio Maffuz; Saúl Rodríguez-Ramírez; Marcos Gutiérrez de la Barrera; Sonia Labastida
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2005-04-01       Impact factor: 3.454

5.  Meta-analysis of survival based on resection margin status following surgery for recurrent rectal cancer.

Authors:  A Bhangu; S M Ali; A Darzi; G Brown; P Tekkis
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.788

6.  Examination of outcome following abdominoperineal resection for adenocarcinoma in Oxford.

Authors:  W Chambers; A Khan; R Waters; I Lindsey; B George; N Mortensen; C Cunningham
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.788

7.  What is the significance of a microscopically positive resection margin in the curative-intent treatment of rectal adenocarcinoma? A retrospective study.

Authors:  Z Fekete; A Muntean; A Irimie; S Hica; L Resiga; N Todor; V Nagy
Journal:  J BUON       Date:  2013 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.533

8.  Influence of local recurrence on survival in patients with rectal cancer.

Authors:  Cameron Platell; Katrina Spilsbury
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 1.872

9.  Consensus statement on the multidisciplinary management of patients with recurrent and primary rectal cancer beyond total mesorectal excision planes.

Authors: 
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Low rectal cancer: classification and standardization of surgery.

Authors:  Eric Rullier; Quentin Denost; Véronique Vendrely; Anne Rullier; Christophe Laurent
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 4.585

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  MRI-detected extramural venous invasion of rectal cancer: Multimodality performance and implications at baseline imaging and after neoadjuvant therapy.

Authors:  Akitoshi Inoue; Shannon P Sheedy; Jay P Heiken; Payam Mohammadinejad; Rondell P Graham; Hee Eun Lee; Scott R Kelley; Stephanie L Hansel; David H Bruining; Jeff L Fidler; Joel G Fletcher
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2021-08-09
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.