Literature DB >> 22353238

Urine survivin as a diagnostic biomarker for bladder cancer: a systematic review.

Ja Hyeon Ku1, Guilherme Godoy, Gilad E Amiel, Seth P Lerner.   

Abstract

What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Although many tests for identifying patients with new or recurrent bladder cancer have been used, a reliable method has yet to be established. Recently, increasing attention has focused on the role of survivin in bladder cancer detection. Because urine survivin tests have better sensitivity than cytology, urine survivin could potentially replace routine cytology and might be used as an adjunct method for cystoscopy. However, the clinical utility of urine survivin as a bladder tumour marker identified in the present study remains to be elucidated. To determine the clinical utility of urine survivin as a bladder tumour marker we systematically reviewed the available evidence. A comprehensive literature review was performed, from August 1997 to March 2011, using three search engines in English including PubMed, Cochrane Library, and SCOPUS. Two reviewers independently evaluated both trial eligibility and methodological quality and data extraction. We included studies that evaluated urine survivin, used cystoscopy and/or histopathology as the reference standard, and allowed the construction of a 2 × 2 contingency table. Bivariate random effect meta-analyses were used to calculate the summary estimated of sensitivity and specificity and to construct a summary receiver-operating characteristics curve of urine survivin tests. In all, 14 studies were included in the present review; two studies had two subsets of data. There were 2051 subjects, including 1038 in the case group and 1013 in the control group, and heterogeneity was present among diagnostic studies. The pooled sensitivity and specificity for urine survivin tests were 0.772 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.745-0.797) and 0.918 (95% CI 0.899-0.934), respectively. The area under the curve of urine survivin tests was 0.9392. When a subgroup analysis with six studies was performed, urine survivin tests had better sensitivity than cytology, but did not match cytology for specificity. The clinical utility of urine survivin as a bladder tumour marker identified in the present study remains to be elucidated.
© 2012 BJU INTERNATIONAL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22353238     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10884.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  19 in total

Review 1.  [Urine cytology - update 2013. A systematic review of recent literature].

Authors:  M Böhm; F vom Dorp; M Schostak; O W Hakenberg
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Volatile metabolomic signature of bladder cancer cell lines based on gas chromatography-mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Daniela Rodrigues; Joana Pinto; Ana Margarida Araújo; Sara Monteiro-Reis; Carmen Jerónimo; Rui Henrique; Maria de Lourdes Bastos; Paula Guedes de Pinho; Márcia Carvalho
Journal:  Metabolomics       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 4.290

Review 3.  What are the currently available and in development molecular markers for bladder cancer? Will they prove to be useful in the future?

Authors:  Mohamed Ismat Abdulmajed; Eyüp Burak Sancak; Berkan Reşorlu; Gydhia Zuhair Al-Chalaby
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2014-10-15

Review 4.  Monitoring survivin expression in cancer: implications for prognosis and therapy.

Authors:  Rodrigo Santa Cruz Guindalini; Maria Cecília Mathias Machado; Bernardo Garicochea
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.074

Review 5.  Metabolomic Approaches for Detection and Identification of Biomarkers and Altered Pathways in Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Nicola Antonio di Meo; Davide Loizzo; Savio Domenico Pandolfo; Riccardo Autorino; Matteo Ferro; Camillo Porta; Alessandro Stella; Cinzia Bizzoca; Leonardo Vincenti; Felice Crocetto; Octavian Sabin Tataru; Monica Rutigliano; Michele Battaglia; Pasquale Ditonno; Giuseppe Lucarelli
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-04-10       Impact factor: 6.208

Review 6.  Molecular signatures in urologic tumors.

Authors:  Spencer Larkin; Natasha Kyprianou
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2013-09-06       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 7.  Diagnosis of prostate cancer via nanotechnological approach.

Authors:  Benedict J Kang; Minhong Jeun; Gun Hyuk Jang; Sang Hoon Song; In Gab Jeong; Choung-Soo Kim; Peter C Searson; Kwan Hyi Lee
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2015-10-19

8.  Bladder cancer diagnosis and identification of clinically significant disease by combined urinary detection of Mcm5 and nuclear matrix protein 22.

Authors:  John D Kelly; Tim J Dudderidge; Alex Wollenschlaeger; Odu Okoturo; Keith Burling; Fiona Tulloch; Ian Halsall; Teresa Prevost; Andrew Toby Prevost; Joana C Vasconcelos; Wendy Robson; Hing Y Leung; Nikhil Vasdev; Robert S Pickard; Gareth H Williams; Kai Stoeber
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The microRNA expression signature of bladder cancer by deep sequencing: the functional significance of the miR-195/497 cluster.

Authors:  Toshihiko Itesako; Naohiko Seki; Hirofumi Yoshino; Takeshi Chiyomaru; Takeshi Yamasaki; Hideo Hidaka; Tomokazu Yonezawa; Nijiro Nohata; Takashi Kinoshita; Masayuki Nakagawa; Hideki Enokida
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  The promise of novel molecular markers in bladder cancer.

Authors:  Jahan Miremami; Natasha Kyprianou
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2014-12-22       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.