Literature DB >> 26328183

What are the currently available and in development molecular markers for bladder cancer? Will they prove to be useful in the future?

Mohamed Ismat Abdulmajed1, Eyüp Burak Sancak2, Berkan Reşorlu2, Gydhia Zuhair Al-Chalaby3.   

Abstract

Urothelial carcinoma is the 9(th) most common cancer worldwide. Most urothelial tumors are non-muscle invasive on presentation. However, two-thirds of non-invasive bladder cancers will eventually recur with a 25% risk of progression to muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Tumor stage, histological grade and pathological invasion of blood vessels and lymphatic tissue are the main indicators for urothelial cancer prognosis. The gold standard for diagnosing bladder cancer is conventional white-light cystoscopy and biopsy. Urine cytology is a highly specific, sensitive test for high-grade tumors or carcinoma in situ (CIS). Urinary NMP22 has an overall sensitivity and specificity for detecting bladder cancer of 49% and 87%, respectively. However, there are false-positive results in the presence of urinary tract infection or hematuria. The detection of specific gene mutations related to urothelial cancers has been studied and employed to reproduce markers helpful for diagnosis. According to current studies, molecular markers can be used to predict tumor recurrence. From a prognostic point of view, new molecular markers have yet to be established as reliable indicators of tumor aggressiveness. We aimed to review the molecular markers with possible prognostic significance that have been discussed in the literature. This review examined the literature for various molecular markers under development for bladder cancer in an attempt to optimize patient care and reduce the costs of treating these patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bladder cancer; molecular markers; predictor of tumor recurrence

Year:  2014        PMID: 26328183      PMCID: PMC4548372          DOI: 10.5152/tud.2014.60973

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Turk J Urol        ISSN: 2149-3235


  47 in total

1.  Superficial urothelial (umbrella) cells. A potential cause of abnormal DNA ploidy results in urine specimens.

Authors:  E M Wojcik; R J Brownlie; T J Bassler; M C Miller
Journal:  Anal Quant Cytol Histol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 0.302

2.  Bladder tumor markers beyond cytology: International Consensus Panel on bladder tumor markers.

Authors:  Vinata B Lokeshwar; Tomonori Habuchi; H Barton Grossman; William M Murphy; Stefan H Hautmann; George P Hemstreet; Aldo V Bono; Robert H Getzenberg; Peter Goebell; Bernd J Schmitz-Dräger; Jack A Schalken; Yves Fradet; Michael Marberger; Edward Messing; Michael J Droller
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.649

3.  Should we abandon the FISH test?

Authors:  Alan M Nieder; Mark S Soloway; Harry W Herr
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2007-01-18       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 4.  The World Health Organization/International Society of Urological Pathology consensus classification of urothelial (transitional cell) neoplasms of the urinary bladder. Bladder Consensus Conference Committee.

Authors:  J I Epstein; M B Amin; V R Reuter; F K Mostofi
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 6.394

Review 5.  Urine markers for bladder cancer surveillance: a systematic review.

Authors:  Bas W G van Rhijn; Henk G van der Poel; Theo H van der Kwast
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2005-03-23       Impact factor: 20.096

6.  Multiprobe fluorescence in situ hybridization (UroVysion) for the detection of urothelial carcinoma - FISHing for the right catch.

Authors:  Lukas Bubendorf
Journal:  Acta Cytol       Date:  2011-02-15       Impact factor: 2.319

Review 7.  Bladder cancer: clinical and pathological profile.

Authors:  Antonio Lopez-Beltran
Journal:  Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl       Date:  2008-09

8.  Microsatellite analysis of voided-urine samples for surveillance of low-grade non-muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma: feasibility and clinical utility in a prospective multicenter study (Cost-Effectiveness of Follow-Up of Urinary Bladder Cancer trial [CEFUB]).

Authors:  Madelon N M van der Aa; Ellen C Zwarthoff; Ewout W Steyerberg; Merel W Boogaard; Yvette Nijsen; Kirstin A van der Keur; Antonius J A van Exsel; Wim J Kirkels; Chris Bangma; Theo H van der Kwast
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2008-05-15       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  Bladder tumor markers for monitoring recurrence and screening comparison of hyaluronic acid-hyaluronidase and BTA-Stat tests.

Authors:  Vinata B Lokeshwar; Grethchen L Schroeder; Marie G Selzer; Stefan H Hautmann; J Timothy Posey; Robert C Duncan; Roger Watson; Lyndon Rose; Steven Markowitz; Mark S Soloway
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2002-07-01       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  An evaluation of urinary microRNA reveals a high sensitivity for bladder cancer.

Authors:  S Miah; E Dudziec; R M Drayton; A R Zlotta; S L Morgan; D J Rosario; F C Hamdy; J W F Catto
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.