Literature DB >> 22352520

Temporal and spectral masking release in low- and mid-frequency regions for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Agnès C Léger1, Brian C J Moore, Christian Lorenzi.   

Abstract

"Masking release" (MR), the improvement of speech intelligibility in modulated compared with unmodulated maskers, is typically smaller than normal for hearing-impaired listeners. The extent to which this is due to reduced audibility or to suprathreshold processing deficits is unclear. Here, the effects of audibility were controlled by using stimuli restricted to the low- (≤1.5 kHz) or mid-frequency (1-3 kHz) region for normal-hearing listeners and hearing-impaired listeners with near-normal hearing in the tested region. Previous work suggests that the latter may have suprathreshold deficits. Both spectral and temporal MR were measured. Consonant identification was measured in quiet and in the presence of unmodulated, amplitude-modulated, and spectrally modulated noise at three signal-to-noise ratios (the same ratios for the two groups). For both frequency regions, consonant identification was poorer for the hearing-impaired than for the normal-hearing listeners in all conditions. The results suggest the presence of suprathreshold deficits for the hearing-impaired listeners, despite near-normal audiometric thresholds over the tested frequency regions. However, spectral MR and temporal MR were similar for the two groups. Thus, the suprathreshold deficits for the hearing-impaired group did not lead to reduced MR.
© 2012 Acoustical Society of America

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22352520     DOI: 10.1121/1.3665993

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  8 in total

1.  Psychometric functions for sentence recognition in sinusoidally amplitude-modulated noises.

Authors:  Yi Shen; Nicole K Manzano; Virginia M Richards
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Spectrotemporal modulation sensitivity for hearing-impaired listeners: dependence on carrier center frequency and the relationship to speech intelligibility.

Authors:  Golbarg Mehraei; Frederick J Gallun; Marjorie R Leek; Joshua G W Bernstein
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  The fluctuating masker benefit for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners with equal audibility at a fixed signal-to-noise ratio.

Authors:  Kenneth Kragh Jensen; Joshua G W Bernstein
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Abnormal intelligibility of speech in competing speech and in noise in a frequency region where audiometric thresholds are near-normal for hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Agnès C Léger; David T Ives; Christian Lorenzi
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-08-11       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Contributions of Age-Related and Audibility-Related Deficits to Aided Consonant Identification in Presbycusis: A Causal-Inference Analysis.

Authors:  Léo Varnet; Agnès C Léger; Sophie Boucher; Crystel Bonnet; Christine Petit; Christian Lorenzi
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 5.750

6.  Age-related deficits in dip-listening evident for isolated sentences but not for spoken stories.

Authors:  Vanessa C Irsik; Ingrid S Johnsrude; Björn Herrmann
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Effects of reverberation on speech intelligibility in noise for hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Raphael Cueille; Mathieu Lavandier; Nicolas Grimault
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 3.653

8.  Age-Related Differences in Lexical Access Relate to Speech Recognition in Noise.

Authors:  Rebecca Carroll; Anna Warzybok; Birger Kollmeier; Esther Ruigendijk
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-07-04
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.