Literature DB >> 22350244

Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration versus open surgery: comparative prospective randomized trial.

V V Grubnik1, A I Tkachenko, V V Ilyashenko, K O Vorotyntseva.   

Abstract

The aim of the study was to analyse safety and benefits of laparoscopic common bile duct (CBD) exploration compared to open. Prospective randomized trial included a total of 256 patients with CBD stones operated from 2005 to 2009 years in a single center. There were two groups of patients: group I-laparoscopic CBD exploration (138 patients), group II-open CBD exploration (118 patients). Patient comorbidity was assessed by means of the American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) score; i.e. ASA II-109 patients, ASA III-59 patients. Bile duct stones were visualized preoperatively by means of US examination in 129 patients, by means of ERCP in 26 patients, by magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in 72 patients. Preoperative evaluation was done through medical history, biochemical tests and ultrasonography. There was no statistical significant difference between 2 groups of patients. No mortality occurred. The mean duration of laparoscopic operations was 82 min (range, 40-160 min). The mean duration of open operations were 90 min (range, 60-150 min). Mean blood loss was much less in laparoscopic group than in open group (20 ± 2 vs. 285 ± 27 ml; p < 0.01). Postoperative complications were observed is nine patients of laparoscopic group and in 15 patients in open group (p < 0.01). There were 102 attempts to perform transcystic exploration of CBD. External drainage was used in 25 (32.8%) patients with transcystic approach. Conversion to laparotomy was performed in two patients. Open operations were performed in 118 patients with choledocholithiasis. External drainage was used in 85% of patients. Morbidity in open group was higher (12.7%) than in laparoscopic group (6.5%). Laparoscopic CBD exploration can be performed with high efficiency, minimal morbidity and mortality. Laparoscopic procedures have advances over open operations in terms of postoperative morbidity and length of hospital stay.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22350244     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-012-2194-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  20 in total

1.  Effectiveness and long-term results of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration.

Authors:  R Riciardi; S Islam; J J Canete; P L Arcand; M E Stoker
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-10-29       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Laparoscopic management of common bile duct stones.

Authors:  S Ebner; J Rechner; S Beller; K Erhart; F M Riegler; G Szinicz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-02-02       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Comparison of endoscopic sphincterotomy and laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct.

Authors:  S E Tranter; M H Thompson
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  National analysis of in-hospital resource utilization in choledocholithiasis management using propensity scores.

Authors:  B K Poulose; P G Arbogast; M D Holzman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-12-09       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Randomised trial of laparoscopic exploration of common bile duct versus postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography for common bile duct stones.

Authors:  M Rhodes; L Sussman; L Cohen; M P Lewis
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-01-17       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  E.A.E.S. multicenter prospective randomized trial comparing two-stage vs single-stage management of patients with gallstone disease and ductal calculi.

Authors:  A Cuschieri; E Lezoche; M Morino; E Croce; A Lacy; J Toouli; A Faggioni; V M Ribeiro; J Jakimowicz; J Visa; G B Hanna
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Laparoscopic management of common bile duct stones: transcystic approach and choledochotomy.

Authors:  Hiromi Tokumura; Akiko Umezawa; Hui Cao; Nobuhide Sakamoto; Yoichi Imaoka; Akio Ouchi; Kyoji Yamamoto
Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg       Date:  2002

8.  Surgery vs endoscopy as primary treatment in symptomatic patients with suspected common bile duct stones: a multicenter randomized trial. French Associations for Surgical Research.

Authors:  B Suc; J Escat; D Cherqui; G Fourtanier; J M Hay; A Fingerhut; B Millat
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1998-07

9.  All-comers policy for laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct.

Authors:  M H Thompson; S E Tranter
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Primary duct closure versus T-tube drainage following exploration of the common bile duct.

Authors:  J A Williams; P J Treacy; P Sidey; C S Worthley; N C Townsend; E A Russell
Journal:  Aust N Z J Surg       Date:  1994-12
View more
  28 in total

1.  Laparoscopic surgery for choledocholithiasis concomitant with calculus of the left intrahepatic duct or abdominal adhesions.

Authors:  Yueqi Wang; Xiaobo Bo; Yaojie Wang; Min Li; Sheng Shen; Tao Suo; Hongtao Pan; Han Liu; Houbao Liu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Laparoscopic Transcystic Versus Transductal Common Bile Duct Exploration: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shahin Hajibandeh; Shahab Hajibandeh; Diwakar Ryali Sarma; Sankar Balakrishnan; Mokhtar Eltair; Rajnish Mankotia; Misra Budhoo; Yogesh Kumar
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  The impact of intraoperative cholangiography on recurrent pancreatitis and biliary complications in patients with gallstone pancreatitis.

Authors:  Paul M Johnson; Mark J Walsh
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-10-06       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  The cystohepatic septum: anatomical findings and surgical considerations.

Authors:  Lucas Nahuel Pina; Agustín Rodríguez; Guido Antonio Valdés; María Luz Tartaglia; Alberto Raúl Ferreres
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 5.  Modern approach to cholecysto-choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  Lapo Bencini; Cinzia Tommasi; Roberto Manetti; Marco Farsi
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-02-16

6.  Transcystic versus traditional laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: its advantages and a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Liwei Pang; Yan Zhang; Yuwen Wang; Jing Kong
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: a safe and definitive treatment for elderly patients.

Authors:  Chufa Zheng; Yaokui Huang; E Xie; Dejin Xie; Yunheng Peng; Xiaozhong Wang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration.

Authors:  Marc Zerey; Stephen Haggerty; William Richardson; Byron Santos; Robert Fanelli; L Michael Brunt; Dimitrios Stefanidis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Clinical spotlight review for the management of choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  Vimal K Narula; Eleanor C Fung; D Wayne Overby; William Richardson; Dimitrios Stefanidis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 10.  Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for cholelithiasis 2016.

Authors:  Susumu Tazuma; Michiaki Unno; Yoshinori Igarashi; Kazuo Inui; Kazuhisa Uchiyama; Masahiro Kai; Toshio Tsuyuguchi; Hiroyuki Maguchi; Toshiyuki Mori; Koji Yamaguchi; Shomei Ryozawa; Yuji Nimura; Naotaka Fujita; Keiichi Kubota; Junichi Shoda; Masami Tabata; Tetsuya Mine; Kentaro Sugano; Mamoru Watanabe; Tooru Shimosegawa
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-12-10       Impact factor: 7.527

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.