Literature DB >> 9687996

Surgery vs endoscopy as primary treatment in symptomatic patients with suspected common bile duct stones: a multicenter randomized trial. French Associations for Surgical Research.

B Suc1, J Escat, D Cherqui, G Fourtanier, J M Hay, A Fingerhut, B Millat.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare surgical treatment (ST) with endoscopic management (EM) in patients with suspected common bile duct stones. PATIENTS: Two hundred twenty eligible patients originating from 18 surgery units. Patients enrolled in this multicenter randomized study had clinical symptoms that included jaundice, mild pancreatitis (Ranson score < or = 2), or mild acute cholangitis; biliary colic (with increased alkaline phosphatase levels); and common bile duct stones or a common bile duct diameter of 1 cm or larger on ultrasonography.
METHODS: Two hundred two patients were randomly assigned to either ST (n=105) or EM (n=97) during a 5-year period. Both groups were comparable with respect to age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, and clinical presentation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The rates of early postoperative additional procedures necessary to deal with the impossibility to perform the initial procedure, complications, and retained stones after ST or EM. Subsidiary endpoints were intention-to-treat analyses of mortality and of major complications and the duration of hospital stay.
RESULTS: Surgical treatment was associated with a significantly (P<.001) lower rate of 1 or 2 additional procedures (8% vs 29%) due to a significantly lower rate of the impossibility to perform the initial procedure (0% vs 5%) (P<.05), major complications (4% vs 13%) (P<.05), and retained stones (6% vs 16%) (P<.04). Minor complications occurred more often in patients having ST (4%) than in those having EM (0%) (P<.01). Cholecystectomy was performed routinely in 102 patients having ST and electively in 36 patients having EM. There was 1 death in each group initially. On an intention-to-treat analysis, 3 deaths (3.1%) occurred after EM and 1 (0.9%) after ST; this difference was not statistically significant (P=.56). Major complications occurred in 4% of patients having ST compared with 1 1% of patients having EM (P<.002). The median duration of hospital stay was 16 days in patients having ST and 12 days in those having EM; this difference was not statistically significant (P=.09).
CONCLUSION: Whether an additional cholecystectomy is performed routinely or electively, the high risk of additional procedures after EM precludes its use as the optimal therapy in patients with symptomatic common bile duct stones, except in those with severe cholangitis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9687996     DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.133.7.702

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Surg        ISSN: 0004-0010


  34 in total

Review 1.  Biliary tract surgery.

Authors:  S A Ahrendt
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  1999-04

Review 2.  Laparoscopic exploration of common bile duct in difficult choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  C K Tai; C N Tang; J P Y Ha; C H Chau; W T Siu; M K W Li
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-04-21       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Preoperative versus intraoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy for management of common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Ahmed A ElGeidie; Gamal K ElEbidy; Yussef M Naeem
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration in patients with complicated cholecystitis: a safety and feasibility study.

Authors:  Hung-Chieh Lo; Yu-Chun Wang; Jui-Chien Huang; Cheng-Hsiung Hsu; Shih-Chi Wu; Chi-Hsun Hsieh
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  [Therapeutic splitting as standard treatment for cholelithiasis].

Authors:  U T Hopt; U Adam
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 0.955

6.  Evidence-based treatment of acute pancreatitis: a look at established paradigms.

Authors:  Stefan Heinrich; Markus Schäfer; Valentin Rousson; Pierre-Alain Clavien
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Cholecystocholedocholithiasis: a case-control study comparing the short- and long-term outcomes for a "laparoscopy-first" attitude with the outcome for sequential treatment (systematic endoscopic sphincterotomy followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy).

Authors:  Renato Costi; Antonio Mazzeo; Francesco Tartamella; Christine Manceau; Bernard Vacher; Alain Valverde
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-05-23       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Timing of cholecystectomy for biliary pancreatitis: do the data support current guidelines?

Authors:  Kaori Ito; Hiromichi Ito; Edward E Whang
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-07-18       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Management of common bile duct stones in the laparoscopic era.

Authors:  A Sharma; P Dahiya; R Khullar; V Soni; M Baijal; P K Chowbey
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 0.656

10.  Gallstone cholangitis: a 10-year experience of combined endoscopic and laparoscopic treatment.

Authors:  L Sarli; D Iusco; G Sgobba; L Roncoroni
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-03-05       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.