Literature DB >> 22350173

Use of a Pfannenstiel incision in minimally invasive colorectal cancer surgery is associated with a lower risk of wound complications.

S T Orcutt1, C J Balentine, C L Marshall, C N Robinson, D A Anaya, A Artinyan, S S Awad, D H Berger, D Albo.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Pfannenstiel incision, widely used in gynecological surgery, has been reported to be associated with lower rates of wound complications than midline incisions in open surgery. However, its effect on wound complications in minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is not well understood. We hypothesize that use of a Pfannenstiel incision in MIS colorectal cancer resections would be associated with fewer short-term wound complication rates.
METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed on 171 patients who had undergone MIS colorectal cancer surgery requiring a specimen extraction/hand-access site, divided into a Pfannenstiel and a midline group depending on the type of incision used. Wound complications compared included disruption, infection, dehiscence, evisceration, and fistula formation. The Mann-Whitney U and Fisher's exact tests were used to analyze differences in risk factors between the groups. Logistic regression was performed to determine factors associated with prevention of wound complications.
RESULTS: Patients in the Pfannenstiel group had significantly lower rates of wound disruption (0 vs. 13%, p = 0.02), superficial surgical site infection (7 vs. 22%, p = 0.03), and overall wound complications (13 vs. 30%, p = 0.04). Using multivariate logistic regression, Pfannenstiel incisions and colon rather than rectal resections were significant predictors of prevention of wound complications.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of a Pfannenstiel incision in MIS colorectal cancer resections is associated with a decreased risk of short-term wound complications. © Springer-Verlag 2012

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22350173     DOI: 10.1007/s10151-012-0808-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tech Coloproctol        ISSN: 1123-6337            Impact factor:   3.781


  20 in total

1.  Laparoscopically assisted ileocolectomy for Crohn's disease through a pfannenstiel incision.

Authors:  A K Greene; P Michetti; M A Peppercorn; R A Hodin
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  The Pfannenstiel or so called "bikini cut": still effective more than 100 years after first description.

Authors:  K Kisielinski; J Conze; A H Murken; N N Lenzen; U Klinge; V Schumpelick
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2004-03-02       Impact factor: 4.739

3.  Meta-analysis of short-term outcomes after laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  N S Abraham; J M Young; M J Solomon
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Single-incision laparoscopic colectomy: a novel approach through a Pfannenstiel incision.

Authors:  M Ragupathi; D I Ramos-Valadez; M D Yaakovian; E M Haas
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 3.781

5.  Hand-assisted laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy: helping hand or hindrance?

Authors:  Y-J Chang; P W Marcello; L C Rusin; P L Roberts; D J Schoetz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-03-23       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Re-establish pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic-assisted sigmoid resection? Randomized trial.

Authors:  R Bergamaschi; J J Tuech; C Cervi; J P Arnaud
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  Obesity increases wound complications in rectal cancer surgery.

Authors:  Courtney J Balentine; Jonathan Wilks; Celia Robinson; Christy Marshall; Daniel Anaya; Daniel Albo; David H Berger
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 2.192

8.  The low transverse Pfannenstiel incision and the prevalence of incisional hernia and nerve entrapment.

Authors:  R W Luijendijk; J Jeekel; R K Storm; P J Schutte; W C Hop; A C Drogendijk; F J Huikeshoven
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 9.  The impact of obesity on outcome after major colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Kelly A Gendall; Sumit Raniga; Ross Kennedy; Frank A Frizelle
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2007-09-27       Impact factor: 4.585

10.  Combination of hand-assisted and laparoscopic proctocolectomy (HALP): Technical aspects, learning curve and early postoperative results.

Authors:  Ayman Agha; Christian Moser; Igors Iesalnieks; Pompiliou Piso; Hans-J Schlitt
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-10-27       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  28 in total

1.  Avoiding extraction site herniation after laparoscopic right colectomy.

Authors:  G L Williams; C Beaton; R Codd; B M Stephenson
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2012-04-12       Impact factor: 3.781

2.  Multivariate analysis of risk factors for surgical site infection after laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Joseph Drosdeck; Alan Harzman; Andrew Suzo; Mark Arnold; Mahmoud Abdel-Rasoul; Syed Husain
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Implementation of intracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right colectomy is safe and associated with a shorter hospital stay.

Authors:  Cristián Jarry; Leonardo Cárcamo; Juan José González; Felipe Bellolio; Rodrigo Miguieles; Gonzalo Urrejola; Alvaro Zúñiga; Fernando Crovari; María Elena Molina; José Tomás Larach
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2020-06-30

4.  Suprapubic single-port approach for complicated diverticulitis.

Authors:  A Spinelli; F Di Candido; M Carvello
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2018-09-15       Impact factor: 3.781

5.  Short and long-term outcomes of a randomised controlled trial of vertical periumbilical wound versus transverse left iliac fossa wound for specimen retrieval in laparoscopic anterior resections.

Authors:  Wah-Siew Tan; Min-Hoe Chew; Kok-Sun Ho; Juriyah Binte Yatim; Joanne Siew-Foon Lai; Choong-Leong Tang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis. Results from a multicentre comparative study on 512 right-sided colorectal cancers.

Authors:  Marco Milone; Ugo Elmore; Enrico Di Salvo; Paolo Delrio; Luigi Bucci; Giuseppe Paolo Ferulano; Carmine Napolitano; Maria Rachele Angiolini; Umberto Bracale; Marco Clemente; Michele D'ambra; Gaetano Luglio; Mario Musella; Ugo Pace; Riccardo Rosati; Francesco Milone
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Robotic ileocolic resection with intracorporeal anastomosis for Crohn's disease.

Authors:  H Hande Aydinli; Marissa Anderson; Amanda Hambrecht; Mitchell A Bernstein; Alexis L Grucela
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2020-07-28

Review 8.  Laparoscopic right colectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies comparing two types of anastomosis.

Authors:  P Carnuccio; J Jimeno; D Parés
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2013-05-18       Impact factor: 3.781

9.  Does stoma site specimen extraction increase postoperative ileostomy complication rates?

Authors:  Wanglin Li; Cigdem Benlice; Luca Stocchi; Hermann Kessler; Emre Gorgun; Meagan Costedio
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Versus Standard Laparoscopic Colectomy: Are Outcomes and Operative Time Different?

Authors:  Brian F Gilmore; Zhifei Sun; Mohamed Adam; Jina Kim; Brian Ezekian; Cecilia Ong; John Migaly; Christopher R Mantyh
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.