Literature DB >> 17965917

Combination of hand-assisted and laparoscopic proctocolectomy (HALP): Technical aspects, learning curve and early postoperative results.

Ayman Agha1, Christian Moser, Igors Iesalnieks, Pompiliou Piso, Hans-J Schlitt.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Various techniques for laparoscopic proctocolectomy have been reported worldwide. We evaluated the technical aspects and early postoperative results of hand-assisted laparoscopic proctocolectomy (HALP) with construction of an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis through a Pfannenstiel incision. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between June 2004 and May 2006, 20 patients (median age 28 years) underwent combined HALP at our institution. Preoperative diagnosis included ulcerative colitis (n = 16), indeterminate colitis (n = 1), familial adenomatous polyposis (n = 2), and carcinoma of the rectum associated with ulcerative colitis (n = 1). All patients were under immunosuppressive therapy. Laparoscopic mobilisation of rectum, sigmoid and descending colon was performed first. Subsequently, hand-assisted laparoscopic mobilization of the transverse and ascending colon as well as creation of an ileal J-pouch were performed through a Pfannenstiel incision. Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis was completed by transrectal stapling device and protected by a loop ileostomy.
RESULTS: The ileal pouch-anal anastomosis could be achieved in 19 cases (95%). There was one conversion (5%) to open surgery with construction of an end-ileostomy. No intraoperative blood transfusions were necessary. The median operating time was 210 minutes (range 180 min to 330 min). It was longer for the first five procedures but then remained constant. Two patients (10%) developed anastomotic leakage, which could be treated conservatively. Mean length of hospital stay was 11 days (range 7-32 days).
CONCLUSIONS: Combined HALP with construction of an ileal J-pouch-anal anastomosis can be performed safely and effectively. The Pfannenstiel incision proved to be advantageous for hand-assisted mobilisation of the transverse colon. Additionally, it was useful for the specimen removal and the J-pouch construction. Our new technique not only proved to be safe, but also resulted in a shortened total operation-time after a learning curve of about five procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17965917     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-007-9621-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  25 in total

1.  Laparoscopically assisted colectomy and ileoanal pouch procedure with and without protective ileostomy.

Authors:  P Kienle; J Weitz; A Benner; C Herfarth; J Schmidt
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-03-06       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Stefan Maartense; Michalda S Dunker; J Frederick Slors; Miguel A Cuesta; Dirk J Gouma; Sander J van Deventer; Ad A van Bodegraven; Willem A Bemelman
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy: case-matched comparative study with open restorative proctocolectomy.

Authors:  P W Marcello; J W Milsom; S K Wong; K A Hammerhofer; M Goormastic; J M Church; V W Fazio
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.585

4.  Ileal pouch anal anastomosis without ileal diversion.

Authors:  H J Sugerman; E L Sugerman; J G Meador; H H Newsome; J M Kellum; E J DeMaria
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Stapled vs hand-sutured ileoanal anastomosis in restorative proctocolectomy. A prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  P Luukkonen; H Järvinen
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1993-04

6.  Laparoscopic-assisted vs open colectomy for severe acute colitis in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD): a retrospective study in 42 patients.

Authors:  M S Dunker; W A Bemelman; J F Slors; R A van Hogezand; J Ringers; D J Gouma
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Laparoscopy for inflammatory bowel disease: pros and cons.

Authors:  T C Sardinha; S D Wexner
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Laparoscopic colectomy for benign colorectal disease is associated with a significant reduction in disability as compared with laparotomy.

Authors:  H H Chen; S D Wexner; E G Weiss; J J Nogueras; O Alabaz; A J Iroatulam; A Nessim; J S Joo
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Early results of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer. Retrospective analysis of 372 patients treated by Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy (COST) Study Group.

Authors:  J W Fleshman; H Nelson; W R Peters; H C Kim; S Larach; R R Boorse; W Ambroze; P Leggett; R Bleday; S Stryker; B Christenson; S Wexner; A Senagore; D Rattner; J Sutton; A P Fine
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.585

10.  Laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair: randomised prospective trial.

Authors:  D L Stoker; D J Spiegelhalter; R Singh; J M Wellwood
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1994-05-21       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  8 in total

1.  Laparoscopic surgery for ulcerative colitis.

Authors:  Luca Stocchi
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2010-12

2.  Hand-assisted versus straight laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy on a training simulator: what is the difference? A stepwise comparison of hand-assisted versus straight laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy performance on an augmented reality simulator.

Authors:  Fabien Leblanc; Conor P Delaney; Clyde N Ellis; Paul C Neary; Bradley J Champagne; Anthony J Senagore
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Role of ileostomy in restorative proctocolectomy.

Authors:  Gianluca Pellino; Guido Sciaudone; Silvestro Canonico; Francesco Selvaggi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-04-21       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Different approaches for complete mobilization of the splenic flexure during laparoscopic rectal cancer resection.

Authors:  Volker Benseler; Matthias Hornung; Igors Iesalnieks; Philipp von Breitenbuch; Gabriel Glockzin; Hans J Schlitt; Ayman Agha
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-05-25       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Laparoscopic colectomy and restorative proctocolectomy for familial adenomatous polyposis.

Authors:  Marco Vitellaro; Giuliano Bonfanti; Paola Sala; Elia Poiasina; Marta Barisella; Stefano Signoroni; Andrea Mancini; Lucio Bertario
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Use of a Pfannenstiel incision in minimally invasive colorectal cancer surgery is associated with a lower risk of wound complications.

Authors:  S T Orcutt; C J Balentine; C L Marshall; C N Robinson; D A Anaya; A Artinyan; S S Awad; D H Berger; D Albo
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2012-02-17       Impact factor: 3.781

7.  Early postoperative and long-term oncological outcomes of laparoscopic treatment for patients with familial adenomatous polyposis.

Authors:  Hye Jin Kim; Gyu-Seog Choi; Jun Seok Park; Soo Yeun Park; Wohn Ho Choi; Jong Pil Ryuk
Journal:  J Korean Surg Soc       Date:  2012-10-29

8.  The influence of dental experience on a dental implant navigation system.

Authors:  Ting-Mao Sun; Huey-Er Lee; Ting-Hsun Lan
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 2.757

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.