Literature DB >> 32607844

Implementation of intracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right colectomy is safe and associated with a shorter hospital stay.

Cristián Jarry1, Leonardo Cárcamo1, Juan José González2, Felipe Bellolio1, Rodrigo Miguieles1, Gonzalo Urrejola1, Alvaro Zúñiga1, Fernando Crovari1, María Elena Molina1, José Tomás Larach3.   

Abstract

Reconstruction after laparoscopic right colectomy (LRC) can be achieved by performing an intracorporeal (IA) or an extracorporeal anastomosis (EA). This study aims to assess the safety of implementing IA in LRC, and to compare its perioperative outcomes with EA during an institution's learning curve. Patients undergoing elective LRC with IA or EA in a teaching university hospital between January 2015 and December 2018 were included. Demographic, clinical, perioperative and histopathological data were collated and outcomes investigated. One hundred and twenty-two patients were included; forty-three (35.2%) had an IA. The main indication for surgery was cancer in both groups (83.7% for IA and 79.8% for EA; p = 0.50). Operative time was longer for IA (180 [150-205] versus 150 [120-180] minutes; p < 0.001). A Pfannenstiel incision was used as extraction site in 97.7% of patients receiving an IA; while a midline incision was used in 97.5% of patients having an EA (p < 0.001). Hospital stay was significantly shorter for IA (3 [3, 4] versus 4 [3-6] days; p = 0.003). There were no differences in postoperative complications rates between groups. There was a 4.7% and 3.8% anastomotic leak rate in the IA and EA group, respectively (p = 1). Re-intervention and readmission rates were similar between groups, and there was no mortality during the study period. The implementation of IA in LRC is safe. Despite longer operative times, IA is associated with a shorter hospital stay when compared to EA in the setting of an institution's learning curve.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Implementation; Intracorporeal anastomosis; Laparoscopic right colectomy; Learning curve; Right hemicolectomy

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32607844     DOI: 10.1007/s13304-020-00840-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Updates Surg        ISSN: 2038-131X


  18 in total

1.  Evaluating the degree of difficulty of laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Faek R Jamali; Asaad M Soweid; Hani Dimassi; Charles Bailey; Joel Leroy; Jacques Marescaux
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2008-08

Review 2.  Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis after laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Francesco Feroci; Elisa Lenzi; Alessia Garzi; Andrea Vannucchi; Stefano Cantafio; Marco Scatizzi
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 3.  Laparoscopic right colectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies comparing two types of anastomosis.

Authors:  P Carnuccio; J Jimeno; D Parés
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2013-05-18       Impact factor: 3.781

4.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation.

Authors:  M E Charlson; P Pompei; K L Ales; C R MacKenzie
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

5.  Randomized clinical trial of intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right colectomy (IEA trial).

Authors:  J Bollo; V Turrado; A Rabal; E Carrillo; I Gich; M C Martinez; P Hernandez; E Targarona
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 6.  Long-term outcome of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: a cochrane systematic review of randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Esther Kuhry; Wolfgang Schwenk; Robin Gaupset; Ulla Romild; Jaap Bonjer
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2008-05-12       Impact factor: 12.111

7.  The comprehensive complication index: a novel continuous scale to measure surgical morbidity.

Authors:  Ksenija Slankamenac; Rolf Graf; Jeffrey Barkun; Milo A Puhan; Pierre-Alain Clavien
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 8.  Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis during laparoscopic right hemicolectomy - systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Roberto Cirocchi; Stefano Trastulli; Eriberto Farinella; Salvatore Guarino; Jacopo Desiderio; Carlo Boselli; Amilcare Parisi; Giuseppe Noya; Karem Slim
Journal:  Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-10-30       Impact factor: 3.279

9.  Intracorporeal or Extracorporeal Ileocolic Anastomosis After Laparoscopic Right Colectomy: A Double-blinded Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Marco E Allaix; Maurizio Degiuli; Marco A Bonino; Alberto Arezzo; Massimiliano Mistrangelo; Roberto Passera; Mario Morino
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 10.  Short term benefits for laparoscopic colorectal resection.

Authors:  W Schwenk; O Haase; J Neudecker; J M Müller
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2005-07-20
View more
  1 in total

1.  Extracorporeal Hand-Sewn vs. Intracorporeal Mechanic Anastomosis During Laparoscopic Right Colectomy.

Authors:  Pasquale Lepiane; Andrea Balla; Eugenio Licardie; Federica Saraceno; Isaias Alarcón; Rosa Scaramuzzo; Anna Guida; Salvador Morales-Conde
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2022 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.789

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.