Literature DB >> 22344289

Long-term performance of cochlear implants in postlingually deafened adults.

Minoo Lenarz1, Hasibe Sönmez, Gert Joseph, Andreas Büchner, Thomas Lenarz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the stability of long-term hearing performance after cochlear implantation (CI) in postlingually deafened adults and to explore the boundaries and limitations of the present test batteries for adult CI patients. STUDY
DESIGN: Case series with chart review.
SETTING: Tertiary referral center. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A cohort of 1005 postlingually deafened adult cochlear implantees, who received their implants after age 18 years, was unilaterally implanted and had no inner ear malformations or cochlear ossification. Hearing performance with cochlear implant was evaluated with the help of 5 standard German speech tests.
RESULTS: The average performance improved significantly during the first 6 months in all tests (learning phase) and afterward entered a plateau phase in which no statistically significant improvements or deteriorations were observed for more than 20 years of follow-up. For each test, the average performance of the cohort, the ceiling effect, and the average results for high and low performers are presented.
CONCLUSIONS: In this study, postlingually deafened adults required about 6 months to learn how to process the artificial signals delivered by the cochlear implant. After this learning phase, the hearing performance entered a stable plateau phase for more than 20 years. This stability reveals the long-term reliability of the technology and the biological stability of the electrode-nerve interface over years. In this study, the authors also evaluated the "ceiling effect" with 5 standard German speech tests, used for evaluation of postlingually deafened adult CI patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22344289     DOI: 10.1177/0194599812438041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0194-5998            Impact factor:   3.497


  36 in total

Review 1.  The Enigma of Poor Performance by Adults With Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Aaron C Moberly; Chelsea Bates; Michael S Harris; David B Pisoni
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.311

2.  Perception of lexical stress cued by low-frequency pitch and insights into speech perception in noise for cochlear implant users and normal hearing adults.

Authors:  Hilal Dincer D'Alessandro; Patrizia Mancini
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-06-08       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Late Cochlear Implantation in Early-Deafened Adults: A Detailed Analysis of Auditory and Self-Perceived Benefits.

Authors:  Joke Debruyne; Miranda Janssen; Jan Brokx
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 1.854

4.  What to Do When Cochlear Implant Users Plateau in Performance: a Pilot Study of Clinician-guided Aural Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Aaron C Moberly; Kara Vasil; Jodi Baxter; Christin Ray
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 2.311

5.  Adaptive benefit of cross-modal plasticity following cochlear implantation in deaf adults.

Authors:  Carly A Anderson; Ian M Wiggins; Pádraig T Kitterick; Douglas E H Hartley
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Verbal Learning and Memory After Cochlear Implantation in Postlingually Deaf Adults: Some New Findings with the CVLT-II.

Authors:  David B Pisoni; Arthur Broadstock; Taylor Wucinich; Natalie Safdar; Kelly Miller; Luis R Hernandez; Kara Vasil; Lauren Boyce; Alexandra Davies; Michael S Harris; Irina Castellanos; Huiping Xu; William G Kronenberger; Aaron C Moberly
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Spectral Contrast Effects Reveal Different Acoustic Cues for Vowel Recognition in Cochlear-Implant Users.

Authors:  Lei Feng; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Comparison of two cochlear implant coding strategies on speech perception.

Authors:  Margaret T Dillon; Emily Buss; English R King; Ellen J Deres; Sarah N Obarowski; Meredith L Anderson; Marcia C Adunka
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2016-10-18

9.  Environmental Sound Awareness in Experienced Cochlear Implant Users and Cochlear Implant Candidates.

Authors:  Kevin R McMahon; Aaron C Moberly; Valeriy Shafiro; Michael S Harris
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 2.311

10.  Role of semantic context and talker variability in speech perception of cochlear-implant users and normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  Erin R O'Neill; Morgan N Parke; Heather A Kreft; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.