Marc Du Bois1, Peter Donceel. 1. From the Occupational, Environmental and Insurance Medicine, Department of Public Health, Kapucijnenvoer 35, Leuven, Belgium.
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: A single-blinded, randomized controlled trial. OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of information and advice during a disability evaluation by medical advisers on the return to work (RTW) rate and recurrence of sick leave of claimants with low back pain (LBP). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There is evidence on the importance of advice during the course of subacute LBP. The effect of informative interventions on RTW rates in workers receiving sickness benefit is not clear. METHODS: A total of 506 claimants with LBP were randomly assigned to the control group (disability evaluation) or the intervention group (combined counseling and disability evaluation). RTW, sick leave recurrence, subsequent surgery, and sick leave duration were measured during a 12-month follow-up. RESULTS: Patients who were provided information and advice showed a higher RTW rate, which was statistically significant at 1 year. That result is mainly attributable to the lower relapse rate in the intervention group (38%) than in the control group (60%). There were no differences between the 2 groups regarding subsequent surgery for LBP and duration of sick leave. CONCLUSION: Claimants should be routinely reassured and advised about LBP to allow early and safe RTW during a disability evaluation before any side effects of being sick-listed have settled.
RCT Entities:
STUDY DESIGN: A single-blinded, randomized controlled trial. OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of information and advice during a disability evaluation by medical advisers on the return to work (RTW) rate and recurrence of sick leave of claimants with low back pain (LBP). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There is evidence on the importance of advice during the course of subacute LBP. The effect of informative interventions on RTW rates in workers receiving sickness benefit is not clear. METHODS: A total of 506 claimants with LBP were randomly assigned to the control group (disability evaluation) or the intervention group (combined counseling and disability evaluation). RTW, sick leave recurrence, subsequent surgery, and sick leave duration were measured during a 12-month follow-up. RESULTS:Patients who were provided information and advice showed a higher RTW rate, which was statistically significant at 1 year. That result is mainly attributable to the lower relapse rate in the intervention group (38%) than in the control group (60%). There were no differences between the 2 groups regarding subsequent surgery for LBP and duration of sick leave. CONCLUSION: Claimants should be routinely reassured and advised about LBP to allow early and safe RTW during a disability evaluation before any side effects of being sick-listed have settled.
Authors: Nicole Vogel; Stefan Schandelmaier; Thomas Zumbrunn; Shanil Ebrahim; Wout El de Boer; Jason W Busse; Regina Kunz Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2017-03-30
Authors: Carla Sabariego; Michaela Coenen; Elizabeth Ito; Klemens Fheodoroff; Chiara Scaratti; Matilde Leonardi; Anastasia Vlachou; Panayiota Stavroussi; Valentina Brecelj; Dare S Kovačič; Eva Esteban Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2018-03-19 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Anthony Venning; Tassia K Oswald; Jeremy Stevenson; Nicci Tepper; Leva Azadi; Sharon Lawn; Paula Redpath Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2021-11-25 Impact factor: 3.295