Literature DB >> 22342935

Patient-calibrated agent-based modelling of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS): from microscopic measurements to macroscopic predictions of clinical progression.

Paul Macklin1, Mary E Edgerton, Alastair M Thompson, Vittorio Cristini.   

Abstract

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS)--a significant precursor to invasive breast cancer--is typically diagnosed as microcalcifications in mammograms. However, the effective use of mammograms and other patient data to plan treatment has been restricted by our limited understanding of DCIS growth and calcification. We develop a mechanistic, agent-based cell model and apply it to DCIS. Cell motion is determined by a balance of biomechanical forces. We use potential functions to model interactions with the basement membrane and amongst cells of unequal size and phenotype. Each cell's phenotype is determined by genomic/proteomic- and microenvironment-dependent stochastic processes. Detailed "sub-models" describe cell volume changes during proliferation and necrosis; we are the first to account for cell calcification. We introduce the first patient-specific calibration method to fully constrain the model based upon clinically-accessible histopathology data. After simulating 45 days of solid-type DCIS with comedonecrosis, the model predicts: necrotic cell lysis acts as a biomechanical stress relief and is responsible for the linear DCIS growth observed in mammography; the rate of DCIS advance varies with the duct radius; the tumour grows 7-10mm per year--consistent with mammographic data; and the mammographic and (post-operative) pathologic sizes are linearly correlated--in quantitative agreement with the clinical literature. Patient histopathology matches the predicted DCIS microstructure: an outer proliferative rim surrounds a stratified necrotic core with nuclear debris on its outer edge and calcification in the centre. This work illustrates that computational modelling can provide new insight on the biophysical underpinnings of cancer. It may 1-day be possible to augment a patient's mammography and other imaging with rigorously-calibrated models that help select optimal surgical margins based upon the patient's histopathologic data.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22342935      PMCID: PMC3322268          DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2012.02.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Theor Biol        ISSN: 0022-5193            Impact factor:   2.691


  74 in total

1.  Development of a three-dimensional multiscale agent-based tumor model: simulating gene-protein interaction profiles, cell phenotypes and multicellular patterns in brain cancer.

Authors:  Le Zhang; Chaitanya A Athale; Thomas S Deisboeck
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2006-07-27       Impact factor: 2.691

2.  Mathematical modelling of the loss of tissue compression responsiveness and its role in solid tumour development.

Authors:  M A J Chaplain; L Graziano; L Preziosi
Journal:  Math Med Biol       Date:  2006-04-28       Impact factor: 1.854

3.  Dynamics of membranes driven by actin polymerization.

Authors:  Nir S Gov; Ajay Gopinathan
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2005-10-20       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Simulating the hallmarks of cancer.

Authors:  Robert G Abbott; Stephanie Forrest; Kenneth J Pienta
Journal:  Artif Life       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 0.667

5.  Mathematical modelling of radiotherapy strategies for early breast cancer.

Authors:  Heiko Enderling; Alexander R A Anderson; Mark A J Chaplain; Alastair J Munro; Jayant S Vaidya
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2005-12-28       Impact factor: 2.691

6.  Nonlinear modelling of cancer: bridging the gap between cells and tumours.

Authors:  J S Lowengrub; H B Frieboes; F Jin; Y-L Chuang; X Li; P Macklin; S M Wise; V Cristini
Journal:  Nonlinearity       Date:  2010

7.  Mathematical modelling of the Warburg effect in tumour cords.

Authors:  Sergey Astanin; Luigi Preziosi
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2009-02-14       Impact factor: 2.691

8.  Intraductal carcinoma of the breast: follow-up after biopsy only.

Authors:  D L Page; W D Dupont; L W Rogers; M Landenberger
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1982-02-15       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Positive predictive value of specific mammographic findings according to reader and patient variables.

Authors:  Aruna Venkatesan; Philip Chu; Karla Kerlikowske; Edward A Sickles; Rebecca Smith-Bindman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-01-21       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Growth pattern of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS): a retrospective analysis based on mammographic findings.

Authors:  J Z Thomson; A J Evans; S E Pinder; H C Burrell; A R Wilson; I O Ellis
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2001-07-20       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  68 in total

1.  A Mechanistic Collective Cell Model for Epithelial Colony Growth and Contact Inhibition.

Authors:  Sebastian Aland; Haralambos Hatzikirou; John Lowengrub; Axel Voigt
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Impact of metabolic heterogeneity on tumor growth, invasion, and treatment outcomes.

Authors:  Mark Robertson-Tessi; Robert J Gillies; Robert A Gatenby; Alexander R A Anderson
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 12.701

3.  The modulatory effect of cell–cell contact on the tumourigenic potential of pre-malignant epithelial cells: a computational exploration.

Authors:  D C Walker; J Southgate
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Stretched cell cycle model for proliferating lymphocytes.

Authors:  Mark R Dowling; Andrey Kan; Susanne Heinzel; Jie H S Zhou; Julia M Marchingo; Cameron J Wellard; John F Markham; Philip D Hodgkin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Integrated PK-PD and agent-based modeling in oncology.

Authors:  Zhihui Wang; Joseph D Butner; Vittorio Cristini; Thomas S Deisboeck
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2015-01-15       Impact factor: 2.745

Review 6.  Towards personalized computational oncology: from spatial models of tumour spheroids, to organoids, to tissues.

Authors:  Aleksandra Karolak; Dmitry A Markov; Lisa J McCawley; Katarzyna A Rejniak
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 4.118

7.  The formation of tight tumor clusters affects the efficacy of cell cycle inhibitors: a hybrid model study.

Authors:  Munju Kim; Damon Reed; Katarzyna A Rejniak
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 2.691

8.  A hybrid agent-based model of the developing mammary terminal end bud.

Authors:  Joseph D Butner; Yao-Li Chuang; Eman Simbawa; A S Al-Fhaid; S R Mahmoud; Vittorio Cristini; Zhihui Wang
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 2.691

Review 9.  Modulators of Redox Metabolism in Head and Neck Cancer.

Authors:  Xiaofei Chen; Jade Mims; Xiumei Huang; Naveen Singh; Edward Motea; Sarah M Planchon; Muhammad Beg; Allen W Tsang; Mercedes Porosnicu; Melissa L Kemp; David A Boothman; Cristina M Furdui
Journal:  Antioxid Redox Signal       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 8.401

Review 10.  Next-generation sequencing: a powerful tool for the discovery of molecular markers in breast ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  Hitchintan Kaur; Shihong Mao; Seema Shah; David H Gorski; Stephen A Krawetz; Bonnie F Sloane; Raymond R Mattingly
Journal:  Expert Rev Mol Diagn       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 5.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.