BACKGROUND: Addictive disorders are heritable, but the search for candidate functional polymorphisms playing an etiological role in addiction is hindered by complexity of the phenotype and the variety of factors interacting to impact behavior. Advances in human genome sequencing and neuroimaging technology provide an unprecedented opportunity to explore the impact of functional genetic variants on variability in behaviorally relevant neural circuitry. Here, we present a model for merging these technologies to trace the links between genes, brain, and addictive behavior. METHODS: We describe imaging genetics and discuss the utility of its application to addiction. We then review data pertaining to impulsivity and reward circuitry as an example of how genetic variation may lead to variation in behavioral phenotype. Finally, we present preliminary data relating the neural basis of reward processing to individual differences in nicotine dependence. RESULTS: Complex human behaviors such as addiction can be traced to their basic genetic building blocks by identifying intermediate behavioral phenotypes, associated neural circuitry, and underlying molecular signaling pathways. Impulsivity has been linked with variation in reward-related activation in the ventral striatum (VS), altered dopamine signaling, and functional polymorphisms of DRD2 and DAT1 genes. In smokers, changes in reward-related VS activation induced by smoking abstinence may be associated with severity of nicotine dependence. CONCLUSIONS: Variation in genes related to dopamine signaling may contribute to heterogeneity in VS sensitivity to reward and, ultimately, to addiction. These findings illustrate the utility of the imaging genetics approach for investigating the neurobiological basis for vulnerability to addiction.
BACKGROUND:Addictive disorders are heritable, but the search for candidate functional polymorphisms playing an etiological role in addiction is hindered by complexity of the phenotype and the variety of factors interacting to impact behavior. Advances in human genome sequencing and neuroimaging technology provide an unprecedented opportunity to explore the impact of functional genetic variants on variability in behaviorally relevant neural circuitry. Here, we present a model for merging these technologies to trace the links between genes, brain, and addictive behavior. METHODS: We describe imaging genetics and discuss the utility of its application to addiction. We then review data pertaining to impulsivity and reward circuitry as an example of how genetic variation may lead to variation in behavioral phenotype. Finally, we present preliminary data relating the neural basis of reward processing to individual differences in nicotine dependence. RESULTS: Complex human behaviors such as addiction can be traced to their basic genetic building blocks by identifying intermediate behavioral phenotypes, associated neural circuitry, and underlying molecular signaling pathways. Impulsivity has been linked with variation in reward-related activation in the ventral striatum (VS), altered dopamine signaling, and functional polymorphisms of DRD2 and DAT1 genes. In smokers, changes in reward-related VS activation induced by smoking abstinence may be associated with severity of nicotine dependence. CONCLUSIONS: Variation in genes related to dopamine signaling may contribute to heterogeneity in VS sensitivity to reward and, ultimately, to addiction. These findings illustrate the utility of the imaging genetics approach for investigating the neurobiological basis for vulnerability to addiction.
Authors: Lynne Dawkins; Jane H Powell; Robert West; John Powell; Alan Pickering Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2006-10-18 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: P M Fisher; C C Meltzer; S K Ziolko; J C Price; E L Moses-Kolko; S L Berga; A R Hariri Journal: Nat Neurosci Date: 2006-10-01 Impact factor: 24.884
Authors: Janet Audrain-McGovern; Daniel Rodriguez; Leonard H Epstein; Jocelyn Cuevas; Kelli Rodgers; E Paul Wileyto Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2009-05-14 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Juliana Yacubian; Tobias Sommer; Katrin Schroeder; Jan Gläscher; Raffael Kalisch; Boris Leuenberger; Dieter F Braus; Christian Büchel Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2007-05-02 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Jean-Claude Dreher; Philip Kohn; Bhaskar Kolachana; Daniel R Weinberger; Karen Faith Berman Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2008-12-22 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Maggie M Sweitzer; Eric C Donny; Lisa C Dierker; Janine D Flory; Stephen B Manuck Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2008-10 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: M R Lee; C L Gallen; T J Ross; P Kurup; B J Salmeron; C A Hodgkinson; D Goldman; E A Stein; M A Enoch Journal: Genes Brain Behav Date: 2013-04-11 Impact factor: 3.449
Authors: Kristina A Uban; Wendy L Comeau; Tamara Bodnar; Wayne K Yu; Joanne Weinberg; Liisa A M Galea Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2014-11-26 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Adina S Fischer; Susan Whitfield-Gabrieli; Robert M Roth; Mary F Brunette; Alan I Green Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2014-07-16 Impact factor: 4.939