INTRODUCTION: Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) and related methods typically entail repeatedly and intensively sampling behavior as it occurs over time and under naturalistic conditions. Although the methodological features of EMA make it a highly valuable research technique in its own right, EMA can also be a potent counterpart to other approaches. One methodological partnership with substantial yet largely untapped potential for the study of tobacco dependence is the pairing of EMA with functional brain imaging. METHODS: The goal of this review is to outline the promise of this approach, with a focus on the combined use of EMA and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Due to the unique and complementary strengths of each method, the merger of EMA and fMRI methods has the potential to advance the understanding of tobacco dependence in ways difficult or impossible to achieve through the use of either method in isolation. RESULTS: In addition to describing a conceptual basis for combining EMA with fMRI, we provide a preliminary empirical illustration of this integrative approach using data from an ongoing study. CONCLUSIONS: EMA and fMRI have independently yielded important findings regarding the nature and treatment of tobacco dependence. The integration of these powerful research methods, however, holds even greater potential for the field of tobacco research. Additionally, recent advances are paving the way for the synergistic use of fMRI and EMA-based methods to develop innovative approaches to tobacco cessation.
INTRODUCTION: Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) and related methods typically entail repeatedly and intensively sampling behavior as it occurs over time and under naturalistic conditions. Although the methodological features of EMA make it a highly valuable research technique in its own right, EMA can also be a potent counterpart to other approaches. One methodological partnership with substantial yet largely untapped potential for the study of tobacco dependence is the pairing of EMA with functional brain imaging. METHODS: The goal of this review is to outline the promise of this approach, with a focus on the combined use of EMA and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Due to the unique and complementary strengths of each method, the merger of EMA and fMRI methods has the potential to advance the understanding of tobacco dependence in ways difficult or impossible to achieve through the use of either method in isolation. RESULTS: In addition to describing a conceptual basis for combining EMA with fMRI, we provide a preliminary empirical illustration of this integrative approach using data from an ongoing study. CONCLUSIONS: EMA and fMRI have independently yielded important findings regarding the nature and treatment of tobacco dependence. The integration of these powerful research methods, however, holds even greater potential for the field of tobacco research. Additionally, recent advances are paving the way for the synergistic use of fMRI and EMA-based methods to develop innovative approaches to tobacco cessation.
Authors: An-Li Wang; Kosha Ruparel; James W Loughead; Andrew A Strasser; Shira J Blady; Kevin G Lynch; Dan Romer; Joseph N Cappella; Caryn Lerman; Daniel D Langleben Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2013-04-24 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Teresa R Franklin; Falk W Lohoff; Ze Wang; Nathan Sciortino; Derek Harper; Yin Li; Will Jens; Jeffrey Cruz; Kyle Kampman; Ron Ehrman; Wade Berrettini; John A Detre; Charles P O'Brien; Anna Rose Childress Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2008-08-13 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Mira Bühler; Sabine Vollstädt-Klein; Andrea Kobiella; Henning Budde; Laurence J Reed; Dieter F Braus; Christian Büchel; Michael N Smolka Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2009-12-30 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Alexander J Shackman; Do P M Tromp; Melissa D Stockbridge; Claire M Kaplan; Rachael M Tillman; Andrew S Fox Journal: Psychol Bull Date: 2016-10-10 Impact factor: 17.737
Authors: Jindra M Bakker; Liesbet Goossens; Poornima Kumar; Iris M J Lange; Stijn Michielse; Koen Schruers; Jojanneke A Bastiaansen; Ritsaert Lieverse; Machteld Marcelis; Thérèse van Amelsvoort; Jim van Os; Inez Myin-Germeys; Diego A Pizzagalli; Marieke Wichers Journal: Psychol Med Date: 2018-11-29 Impact factor: 7.723
Authors: Robert Ross MacLean; Steve Martino; Kathleen M Carroll; Joshua M Smyth; Aaron L Pincus; Stephen J Wilson Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2017-06-01 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Timothy J Trull; Johanna Hepp; Andrea M Wycoff; Tayler J Vebares; Megan N Fleming; Jessica P Y Hua; Ellen W Yeung; John G Kerns Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2021-10-23 Impact factor: 4.839
Authors: Alexander J Shackman; Melissa D Stockbridge; Rachael M Tillman; Claire M Kaplan; Do P M Tromp; Andrew S Fox; Matthias Gamer Journal: J Exp Psychopathol Date: 2016
Authors: Stephen J Wilson; Mauricio R Delgado; Sherry A McKee; Patricia S Grigson; R Ross MacLean; Travis T Nichols; Shannon L Henry Journal: Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci Date: 2014-12 Impact factor: 3.282