Literature DB >> 27583122

Prescribing attitudes, behaviors and opinions regarding metformin for patients with diabetes: a focus group study.

Katy E Trinkley1, Daniel C Malone2, Jennifer A Nelson3, Joseph J Saseen4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to identify the reasons why metformin prescribing is suboptimal.
METHODS: Two semi-structured focus groups with attitudinal questionnaires and a brief educational presentation were held in two US cities. Participants included providers (physicians, pharmacists, midlevel practitioners) caring for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in an ambulatory setting. Outcome measures included provider attitudes, behaviors and opinions regarding the use of metformin.
RESULTS: Participants identified three main themes influencing the use of metformin, including the appropriate timing of metformin initiation, known risks associated with metformin, and procedures to manage safety concerns and mitigate adverse effects associated with metformin. Participant prescribing behaviors of metformin were not consistent with the best available evidence in the settings of renal insufficiency, heart failure, hepatic dysfunction, alcohol use, and lactic acidosis. With minimal education, provider prescribing behaviors appeared to change by the end of the focus group to align more closely with the best available evidence.
CONCLUSIONS: Provider attitudes, behaviors and opinions regarding the use of metformin for T2DM reveals the need for further education to improve appropriate use of metformin. Educational interventions should target prescribing behaviors and opinions identified to be inconsistent with the evidence.

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID: 27583122      PMCID: PMC4994394          DOI: 10.1177/2040622316657328

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ther Adv Chronic Dis        ISSN: 2040-6223            Impact factor:   5.091


  16 in total

1.  Improved clinical outcomes associated with metformin in patients with diabetes and heart failure.

Authors:  Dean T Eurich; Sumit R Majumdar; Finlay A McAlister; Ross T Tsuyuki; Jeffrey A Johnson
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 19.112

2.  Patterns of medication initiation in newly diagnosed diabetes mellitus: quality and cost implications.

Authors:  Nihar R Desai; William H Shrank; Michael A Fischer; Jerry Avorn; Joshua N Liberman; Sebastian Schneeweiss; Juliana Pakes; Troyen A Brennan; Niteesh K Choudhry
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 4.965

3.  Qualitative research. Introducing focus groups.

Authors:  J Kitzinger
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-07-29

4.  Comparative outcomes study of metformin intervention versus conventional approach the COSMIC Approach Study.

Authors:  Dennis R Cryer; Savian P Nicholas; David H Henry; Donna J Mills; Bruce V Stadel
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 5.  Risk of fatal and nonfatal lactic acidosis with metformin use in type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Shelley R Salpeter; Elizabeth Greyber; Gary A Pasternak; Edwin E Salpeter Posthumous
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-01-20

6.  Prescriber compliance with black box warnings in older adult patients.

Authors:  Judith R Ricci; Charmaine Coulen; Jan E Berger; Marsha C Moore; Angela McQueen; Saira A Jan
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2009-11-01       Impact factor: 2.229

7.  Recent antihyperglycemic prescribing trends for US privately insured patients with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Fredric J Cohen; Cheryl A Neslusan; Jonathan E Conklin; Xue Song
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 19.112

8.  Effect of intensive blood-glucose control with metformin on complications in overweight patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 34). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-09-12       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 9.  Comparative safety and effectiveness of metformin in patients with diabetes mellitus and heart failure: systematic review of observational studies involving 34,000 patients.

Authors:  Dean T Eurich; Daniala L Weir; Sumit R Majumdar; Ross T Tsuyuki; Jeffrey A Johnson; Lisa Tjosvold; Saskia E Vanderloo; Finlay A McAlister
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2013-03-18       Impact factor: 8.790

Review 10.  Systematic review: comparative effectiveness and safety of oral medications for type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Shari Bolen; Leonard Feldman; Jason Vassy; Lisa Wilson; Hsin-Chieh Yeh; Spyridon Marinopoulos; Crystal Wiley; Elizabeth Selvin; Renee Wilson; Eric B Bass; Frederick L Brancati
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2007-07-16       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  3 in total

1.  Effect of metformin on neurodegenerative disease among elderly adult US veterans with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Qian Shi; Shuqian Liu; Vivian A Fonseca; Tina K Thethi; Lizheng Shi
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 2.692

2.  Overcoming barriers to the use of metformin: patient and provider perspectives.

Authors:  James H Flory; Scott Keating; Dominique Guelce; Alvin I Mushlin
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 2.711

3.  Reducing cardiovascular risk among people living with HIV: Rationale and design of the INcreasing Statin Prescribing in HIV Behavioral Economics REsearch (INSPIRE) randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Sae Takada; Allison J Ober; Judith S Currier; Noah J Goldstein; Tamara B Horwich; Brian S Mittman; Suzanne B Shu; Chi-Hong Tseng; Tara Vijayan; Soma Wali; William E Cunningham; Joseph A Ladapo
Journal:  Prog Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 8.194

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.