Literature DB >> 22338952

Complications of syndesmotic screw removal.

Tim Schepers1, Esther M M Van Lieshout, Mark R de Vries, Maarten Van der Elst.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Currently, the metallic syndesmotic screw is the gold standard in the treatment of syndesmotic disruption. Whether or not this screw needs to be removed remains debatable. The aim of the current study was to determine the complications which occur following routine removal of the syndesmotic screw following operative treatment of unstable ankle fractures.
METHODS: This was a retrospective study with consecutive cases in a Level-2 Trauma center. All patients with routine removal of a syndesmotic screw, following the treatment of an unstable ankle fracture, between January 1, 2004 and November 30, 2010 were included. Complications recorded were: 1) minor or major wound infection following removal of the syndesmotic screw, 2) recurrent syndesmotic diastasis, and 3) unnecessary removal of a broken screw, not recognized during preoperative planning prior to surgery.
RESULTS: A total of 76 patients were included. A wound infection occurred in 9.2% (N = 7) of which 2.6% (N = 2) were deep infections requiring reoperation. Recurrent syndesmotic diastasis was found in 6.6% (N = 5) of patients, and in 6.6% (N = 5) screws were broken at the time of implant removal. In the group with recurrent diastasis the screws were removed significantly earlier compared with the group without recurrent diastasis (Mann-Whitney U-test; p = 0.011) and the group with screw breakage had their screws significantly longer in place compared with the group without breakage (p = 0.038).
CONCLUSION: A total of 22.4% complications occurred upon routine removal of the syndesmotic screw. Removal might therefore be considered only in selected cases with complaints, after a minimum of eight to twelve weeks and using antibiotic prophylaxis during removal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22338952     DOI: 10.3113/FAI.2011.1040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Foot Ankle Int        ISSN: 1071-1007            Impact factor:   2.827


  28 in total

1.  Dynamic fixation is superior in terms of clinical outcomes to static fixation in managing distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury.

Authors:  Kaifeng Gan; Dingli Xu; Keqi Hu; Wei Wu; Yandong Shen
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-08-17       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Novel anatomical reconstruction of distal tibiofibular ligaments restores syndesmotic biomechanics.

Authors:  Jian Che; Chunbao Li; Zhipeng Gao; Wei Qi; Binping Ji; Yujie Liu; Ming Han Lincoln Liow
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Use of Suture Button in the Treatment of Syndesmosis Injuries.

Authors:  Mette Renate Andersen; Wender Figved
Journal:  JBJS Essent Surg Tech       Date:  2018-05-09

4.  Effect of Antibiotic Prophylaxis on Surgical Site Infections Following Removal of Orthopedic Implants Used for Treatment of Foot, Ankle, and Lower Leg Fractures: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Manouk Backes; Siem A Dingemans; Marcel G W Dijkgraaf; H Rogier van den Berg; Bart van Dijkman; Jochem M Hoogendoorn; Pieter Joosse; Ewan D Ritchie; W Herbert Roerdink; Judith P M Schots; Nico L Sosef; Ingrid J B Spijkerman; Bas A Twigt; Alexander H van der Veen; Ruben N van Veen; Jefrey Vermeulen; Dagmar I Vos; Jasper Winkelhagen; J Carel Goslings; Tim Schepers
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-12-26       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  The use of TightRope fixation for ankle syndesmosis injuries: our experience.

Authors:  M Bondi; N Rossi; A Pizzoli; L Renzi Brivio
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2016-08-27

Review 6.  Internal fixation of distal tibiofibular syndesmotic injuries: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chen Wang; Xin Ma; Xu Wang; Jiazhang Huang; Chao Zhang; Li Chen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-07-20       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Syndesmosis injuries.

Authors:  Kenneth J Hunt
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2013-12

8.  A Novel Suture Button Construct for Acute Ankle Syndesmotic Injuries; A Prospective Clinical and Radiological Analysis.

Authors:  Mohamed A Imam; James Holton; Abdel Na Hassan; Ahmed Matthana
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2018-05

Review 9.  Acute syndesmotic injuries in ankle fractures: From diagnosis to treatment and current concepts.

Authors:  Francesco Pogliacomi; Massimo De Filippo; Daniele Casalini; Alberto Longhi; Fabrizio Tacci; Rocco Perotta; Francesco Pagnini; Silvio Tocco; Francesco Ceccarelli
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2021-05-18

10.  APKASS Consensus Statement on Chronic Syndesmosis Injury, Part 3: Fusion Techniques, Comorbidity Treatments, Postoperative Rehabilitation, and Return-to-Sport Indications.

Authors:  Yujie Song; Zhongmin Shi; Hiroaki Kurokawa; Yasuhito Tanaka; Samuel K K Ling; Patrick Yung; Chayanin Angthong; Seung Hwan Han; Yinghui Hua; Hongyun Li; Chen Jiao; Jianchao Gui; Qi Li
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-06-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.