Literature DB >> 22332802

Differential effects of planktonic and biofilm MRSA on human fibroblasts.

Kelly R Kirker1, Garth A James, Philip Fleckman, John E Olerud, Philip S Stewart.   

Abstract

Bacteria colonizing chronic wounds often exist as biofilms, yet their role in chronic wound pathogenesis remains unclear. Staphylococcus aureus biofilms induce apoptosis in dermal keratinocytes, and given that chronic wound biofilms also colonize dermal tissue, it is important to investigate the effects of bacterial biofilms on dermal fibroblasts. The effects of a predominant wound pathogen, methicillin-resistant S. aureus, on normal, human, dermal fibroblasts were examined in vitro. Cell-culture medium was conditioned with equivalent numbers of either planktonic or biofilm methicillin-resistant S. aureus and then fed to fibroblast cultures. Fibroblast response was evaluated using scratch, viability, and apoptosis assays. The results suggested that fibroblasts experience the same fate when exposed to the soluble products of either planktonic or biofilm methicillin-resistant S. aureus, namely limited migration followed by death. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays demonstrated that fibroblast production of cytokines, growth factors, and proteases were differentially affected by planktonic and biofilm-conditioned medium. Planktonic-conditioned medium induced more interleukin-6, interleukin-8, vascular endothelial growth factor, transforming growth factor-β1, heparin-bound epidermal growth factor, matrix metalloproteinase-1, and metalloproteinase-3 production in fibroblasts than the biofilm-conditioned medium. Biofilm-conditioned medium induced more tumor necrosis factor-α production in fibroblasts compared with planktonic-conditioned medium, and suppressed metalloproteinase-3 production compared with controls.
© 2012 by the Wound Healing Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22332802      PMCID: PMC3292663          DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2012.00769.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Wound Repair Regen        ISSN: 1067-1927            Impact factor:   3.617


  40 in total

1.  Delayed wound healing in diabetic (db/db) mice with Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm challenge: a model for the study of chronic wounds.

Authors:  Ge Zhao; Phillip C Hochwalt; Marcia L Usui; Robert A Underwood; Pradeep K Singh; Garth A James; Philip S Stewart; Philip Fleckman; John E Olerud
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 3.617

2.  Differential gene expression profiling of Staphylococcus aureus cultivated under biofilm and planktonic conditions.

Authors:  Alexandra Resch; Ralf Rosenstein; Christiane Nerz; Friedrich Götz
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Characterization of an in vitro model for evaluating the interface between skin and percutaneous biomaterials.

Authors:  Yuko Fukano; Negar G Knowles; Marcia L Usui; Robert A Underwood; Kip D Hauch; Andrew J Marshall; Buddy D Ratner; Cecilia Giachelli; William G Carter; Philip Fleckman; John E Olerud
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.617

4.  Large induction of keratinocyte growth factor expression by serum growth factors and pro-inflammatory cytokines in cultured fibroblasts.

Authors:  M Brauchle; K Angermeyer; G Hübner; S Werner
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 9.867

5.  Human skin wounds: a major and snowballing threat to public health and the economy.

Authors:  Chandan K Sen; Gayle M Gordillo; Sashwati Roy; Robert Kirsner; Lynn Lambert; Thomas K Hunt; Finn Gottrup; Geoffrey C Gurtner; Michael T Longaker
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2009 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.617

6.  Inhibition of keratinocyte migration by lipopolysaccharide.

Authors:  Chris Loryman; Jonathan Mansbridge
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.617

7.  Microscopic and physiologic evidence for biofilm-associated wound colonization in vivo.

Authors:  Stephen C Davis; Carlos Ricotti; Alex Cazzaniga; Esperanza Welsh; William H Eaglstein; Patricia M Mertz
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.617

8.  Loss of viability and induction of apoptosis in human keratinocytes exposed to Staphylococcus aureus biofilms in vitro.

Authors:  Kelly R Kirker; Patrick R Secor; Garth A James; Philip Fleckman; John E Olerud; Philip S Stewart
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2009-08-11       Impact factor: 3.617

9.  Bacterial peptidoglycans but not CpG oligodeoxynucleotides activate synovial fibroblasts by toll-like receptor signaling.

Authors:  Diego Kyburz; Janine Rethage; Reinhart Seibl; Roger Lauener; Renate E Gay; Dennis A Carson; Steffen Gay
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2003-03

10.  Staphylococcus aureus Biofilm and Planktonic cultures differentially impact gene expression, mapk phosphorylation, and cytokine production in human keratinocytes.

Authors:  Patrick R Secor; Garth A James; Philip Fleckman; John E Olerud; Kate McInnerney; Philip S Stewart
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2011-06-21       Impact factor: 3.605

View more
  24 in total

Review 1.  The Effect of pH on the Extracellular Matrix and Biofilms.

Authors:  Eleri M Jones; Christine A Cochrane; Steven L Percival
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 4.730

2.  Hyperosmotic Agents and Antibiotics Affect Dissolved Oxygen and pH Concentration Gradients in Staphylococcus aureus Biofilms.

Authors:  Mia Mae Kiamco; Erhan Atci; Abdelrhman Mohamed; Douglas R Call; Haluk Beyenal
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Efficacy of Concentrated Surfactant-Based Wound Dressings in Wound Repair and Biofilm Reduction.

Authors:  Anne-Marie Salisbury; Dieter Mayer; Rui Chen; Steven L Percival
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 4.730

4.  Role of Daptomycin on Burn Wound Healing in an Animal Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infection Model.

Authors:  Oriana Simonetti; Guendalina Lucarini; Fiorenza Orlando; Elisa Pierpaoli; Roberto Ghiselli; Mauro Provinciali; Pamela Castelli; Mario Guerrieri; Roberto Di Primio; Annamaria Offidani; Andrea Giacometti; Oscar Cirioni
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Bidirectional alterations in antibiotics susceptibility in Staphylococcus aureus-Pseudomonas aeruginosa dual-species biofilm.

Authors:  Elena Y Trizna; Maria N Yarullina; Diana R Baidamshina; Anna V Mironova; Farida S Akhatova; Elvira V Rozhina; Rawil F Fakhrullin; Alsu M Khabibrakhmanova; Almira R Kurbangalieva; Mikhail I Bogachev; Airat R Kayumov
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  Extracellular Bacterial Proteases in Chronic Wounds: A Potential Therapeutic Target?

Authors:  Louise Suleman
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 4.730

7.  Dermal fibroblast cells interactions with single and triple bacterial-species biofilms.

Authors:  Betül Çelebi-Saltik; Didem Kart
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 2.316

Review 8.  A Paradigm of Fibroblast Activation and Dermal Wound Contraction to Guide the Development of Therapies for Chronic Wounds and Pathologic Scars.

Authors:  Howard Levinson
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 9.  Biofilms and Inflammation in Chronic Wounds.

Authors:  Ge Zhao; Marcia L Usui; Soyeon I Lippman; Garth A James; Philip S Stewart; Philip Fleckman; John E Olerud
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 4.730

10.  Staphylococcus aureus biofilms decrease osteoblast viability, inhibits osteogenic differentiation, and increases bone resorption in vitro.

Authors:  Carlos J Sanchez; Catherine L Ward; Desiree R Romano; Brady J Hurtgen; Sharanda K Hardy; Ronald L Woodbury; Alex V Trevino; Christopher R Rathbone; Joseph C Wenke
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.