Literature DB >> 22331955

New comprehensive cytogenetic scoring system for primary myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and oligoblastic acute myeloid leukemia after MDS derived from an international database merge.

Julie Schanz1, Heinz Tüchler, Francesc Solé, Mar Mallo, Elisa Luño, José Cervera, Isabel Granada, Barbara Hildebrandt, Marilyn L Slovak, Kazuma Ohyashiki, Christian Steidl, Christa Fonatsch, Michael Pfeilstöcker, Thomas Nösslinger, Peter Valent, Aristoteles Giagounidis, Carlo Aul, Michael Lübbert, Reinhard Stauder, Otto Krieger, Guillermo Garcia-Manero, Stefan Faderl, Sherry Pierce, Michelle M Le Beau, John M Bennett, Peter Greenberg, Ulrich Germing, Detlef Haase.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The karyotype is a strong independent prognostic factor in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Since the implementation of the International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) in 1997, knowledge concerning the prognostic impact of abnormalities has increased substantially. The present study proposes a new and comprehensive cytogenetic scoring system based on an international data collection of 2,902 patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were included from the German-Austrian MDS Study Group (n = 1,193), the International MDS Risk Analysis Workshop (n = 816), the Spanish Hematological Cytogenetics Working Group (n = 849), and the International Working Group on MDS Cytogenetics (n = 44) databases. Patients with primary MDS and oligoblastic acute myeloid leukemia (AML) after MDS treated with supportive care only were evaluated for overall survival (OS) and AML evolution. Internal validation by bootstrap analysis and external validation in an independent patient cohort were performed to confirm the results.
RESULTS: In total, 19 cytogenetic categories were defined, providing clear prognostic classification in 91% of all patients. The abnormalities were classified into five prognostic subgroups (P < .001): very good (median OS, 61 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.5; n = 81); good (49 months; HR, 1.0 [reference category]; n = 1,809); intermediate (26 months; HR, 1.6; n = 529); poor (16 months; HR, 2.6; n = 148); and very poor (6 months; HR, 4.2; n = 187). The internal and external validations confirmed the results of the score.
CONCLUSION: In conclusion, these data should contribute to the ongoing efforts to update the IPSS by refining the cytogenetic risk categories.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22331955      PMCID: PMC4874200          DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2011.35.6394

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  23 in total

1.  Coalesced multicentric analysis of 2,351 patients with myelodysplastic syndromes indicates an underestimation of poor-risk cytogenetics of myelodysplastic syndromes in the international prognostic scoring system.

Authors:  Julie Schanz; Christian Steidl; Christa Fonatsch; Michael Pfeilstöcker; Thomas Nösslinger; Heinz Tuechler; Peter Valent; Barbara Hildebrandt; Aristoteles Giagounidis; Carlo Aul; Michael Lübbert; Reinhard Stauder; Otto Krieger; Guillermo Garcia-Manero; Hagop Kantarjian; Ulrich Germing; Detlef Haase; Elihu Estey
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-04-25       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Identification of novel cytogenetic markers with prognostic significance in a series of 968 patients with primary myelodysplastic syndromes.

Authors:  Francesc Solé; Elisa Luño; Carmen Sanzo; Blanca Espinet; Guillermo F Sanz; José Cervera; María José Calasanz; Juan Cruz Cigudosa; Fuensanta Millà; Josep Maria Ribera; Encarna Bureo; Maria Luisa Marquez; Eva Arranz; Lourdes Florensa
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 3.  Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors.

Authors:  F E Harrell; K L Lee; D B Mark
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1996-02-28       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Cytogenetic analysis of CD34+ subpopulations in AML and MDS characterized by the expression of CD38 and CD117.

Authors:  D Haase; M Feuring-Buske; C Schäfer; C Schoch; C Troff; B Gahn; W Hiddemann; B Wörmann
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 11.528

5.  World Health Organization classification in combination with cytogenetic markers improves the prognostic stratification of patients with de novo primary myelodysplastic syndromes.

Authors:  Paolo Bernasconi; Catherine Klersy; Marina Boni; Paola M Cavigliano; Silvia Calatroni; Ilaria Giardini; Barbara Rocca; Rita Zappatore; Marilena Caresana; Irene Dambruoso; Mario Lazzarino; Carlo Bernasconi
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 6.998

6.  Myelodysplastic syndromes: a scoring system with prognostic significance.

Authors:  G J Mufti; J R Stevens; D G Oscier; T J Hamblin; D Machin
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 6.998

7.  Clinical implications of chromosomal abnormalities in 401 patients with myelodysplastic syndromes: a multicentric study in Japan.

Authors:  K Toyama; K Ohyashiki; Y Yoshida; T Abe; S Asano; H Hirai; K Hirashima; T Hotta; A Kuramoto; S Kuriya
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 11.528

8.  New insights into the prognostic impact of the karyotype in MDS and correlation with subtypes: evidence from a core dataset of 2124 patients.

Authors:  Detlef Haase; Ulrich Germing; Julie Schanz; Michael Pfeilstöcker; Thomas Nösslinger; Barbara Hildebrandt; Andrea Kundgen; Michael Lübbert; Regina Kunzmann; Aristoteles A N Giagounidis; Carlo Aul; Lorenz Trümper; Otto Krieger; Reinhard Stauder; Thomas H Müller; Friedrich Wimazal; Peter Valent; Christa Fonatsch; Christian Steidl
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2007-08-28       Impact factor: 22.113

9.  Apoptosis in bone marrow biopsy samples involving stromal and hematopoietic cells in 50 patients with myelodysplastic syndromes.

Authors:  A Raza; S Gezer; S Mundle; X Z Gao; S Alvi; R Borok; S Rifkin; A Iftikhar; V Shetty; A Parcharidou
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1995-07-01       Impact factor: 22.113

10.  Design and analysis of randomized clinical trials requiring prolonged observation of each patient. II. analysis and examples.

Authors:  R Peto; M C Pike; P Armitage; N E Breslow; D R Cox; S V Howard; N Mantel; K McPherson; J Peto; P G Smith
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  161 in total

1.  Validation of WHO classification-based Prognostic Scoring System (WPSS) for myelodysplastic syndromes and comparison with the revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R). A study of the International Working Group for Prognosis in Myelodysplasia (IWG-PM).

Authors:  M G Della Porta; H Tuechler; L Malcovati; J Schanz; G Sanz; G Garcia-Manero; F Solé; J M Bennett; D Bowen; P Fenaux; F Dreyfus; H Kantarjian; A Kuendgen; A Levis; J Cermak; C Fonatsch; M M Le Beau; M L Slovak; O Krieger; M Luebbert; J Maciejewski; S M M Magalhaes; Y Miyazaki; M Pfeilstöcker; M A Sekeres; W R Sperr; R Stauder; S Tauro; P Valent; T Vallespi; A A van de Loosdrecht; U Germing; D Haase; P L Greenberg; M Cazzola
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 11.528

2.  What lies beyond del(5q) in myelodysplastic syndrome?

Authors:  Vera Adema; Rafael Bejar
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 9.941

3.  Application of the international prognostic scoring system-revised in therapy-related myelodysplastic syndromes and oligoblastic acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  C Y Ok; R P Hasserjian; P S Fox; F Stingo; Z Zuo; K H Young; K Patel; L J Medeiros; G Garcia-Manero; S A Wang
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 11.528

4.  Impact of the revised International Prognostic Scoring System on the outcome of patients with acute myeloid leukemia with or without antecedent myelodysplastic syndrome.

Authors:  F Stölzel; M Kramer; B Mohr; M Wermke; M Bornhäuser; G Ehninger; M Schaich; U Platzbecker
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2013-11-25       Impact factor: 11.528

5.  Blockade of BCL-2 proteins efficiently induces apoptosis in progenitor cells of high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes patients.

Authors:  S Jilg; V Reidel; C Müller-Thomas; J König; J Schauwecker; U Höckendorf; C Huberle; O Gorka; B Schmidt; R Burgkart; J Ruland; H-J Kolb; C Peschel; R A J Oostendorp; K S Götze; P J Jost
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 11.528

Review 6.  [Myelodysplastic syndromes. Epidemiology, molecular and morphological characteristics and risk stratification].

Authors:  A H Schmitt-Graeff; M J Müller; P Fisch
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.011

7.  Jumping translocations in myelodysplastic syndromes.

Authors:  Cecilia C S Yeung; H Joachim Deeg; Colin Pritchard; David Wu; Min Fang
Journal:  Cancer Genet       Date:  2016-08-08

8.  Minimal morphological criteria for defining bone marrow dysplasia: a basis for clinical implementation of WHO classification of myelodysplastic syndromes.

Authors:  M G Della Porta; E Travaglino; E Boveri; M Ponzoni; L Malcovati; E Papaemmanuil; G M Rigolin; C Pascutto; G Croci; U Gianelli; R Milani; I Ambaglio; C Elena; M Ubezio; M C Da Via'; E Bono; D Pietra; F Quaglia; R Bastia; V Ferretti; A Cuneo; E Morra; P J Campbell; A Orazi; R Invernizzi; M Cazzola
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 11.528

9.  Complex or monosomal karyotype and not blast percentage is associated with poor survival in acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome patients with inv(3)(q21q26.2)/t(3;3)(q21;q26.2): a Bone Marrow Pathology Group study.

Authors:  Heesun J Rogers; James W Vardiman; John Anastasi; Gordana Raca; Natasha M Savage; Athena M Cherry; Daniel Arber; Erika Moore; Jennifer J D Morrissette; Adam Bagg; Yen-Chun Liu; Susan Mathew; Attilio Orazi; Pei Lin; Sa A Wang; Carlos E Bueso-Ramos; Kathryn Foucar; Robert P Hasserjian; Ramon V Tiu; Matthew Karafa; Eric D Hsi
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 10.  Last marrow standing: bone marrow transplantation for acquired bone marrow failure conditions.

Authors:  Aaron T Gerds; Bart L Scott
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.952

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.